Query regarding Special Relativity

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of inertial reference frames and how they relate to motion and acceleration. It is mentioned that according to special relativity, there is no measurement that can determine whether an object is stationary or in motion. The discussion also touches on the scenario of two metallic balls colliding and how their motion can be described using different inertial frames of reference. The concept of non-inertial frames and their impact on the motion of objects is also mentioned.
  • #1
aditya ver.2.0
67
4
According to SR, there is no measurement that can determine whether an object is stationary or under motion. So if two metallic balls collide with each other, then aren't there motion between the two balls? Only then they will collide.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
aditya ver.2.0 said:
According to SR, there is no measurement that can determine whether an object is stationary or under motion. So if two metallic balls collide with each other, then aren't there motion between the two balls? Only then they will collide.

There is no measurement that can distinguish between these situations:
1) Left-hand ball is at rest, right-hand ball is moving right-to-left and strikes the left-hand ball
2) Right-hand ball is at rest, left-hand ball is moving left to right and strikes right-hand ball
3) Left-hand ball is moving left-to-right, right-hand ball is moving right-to-left at same speed, both balls meet in the middle.
4) ...

The first case corresponds to what an observer at rest relative to the left-hand ball sees, the second case corresponds to what an observer at rest relative to the right-hand ball sees, the third case is what an observer at rest in the center sees.
 
  • #3
aditya ver.2.0 said:
According to SR, there is no measurement that can determine whether an object is stationary or under motion. So if two metallic balls collide with each other, then aren't there motion between the two balls? Only then they will collide.
Are you asking about what happens after the two balls collide and instead of motion toward each other there is now motion away from each other?

If so, the two balls are not inertial. SR only states that it's impossible to determine if an inertial object is absolutely at rest or in motion. SR is not claiming that you cannot tell that an accelerated object experiences motion at some time.

So if we follow through on what Nugatory said, we cannot tell if each ball started out at rest and ended up in motion, or started out in motion and ended up at rest, or started out in motion and ended up in a different motion.
 
  • #4
aditya ver.2.0 said:
According to SR, there is no measurement that can determine whether an object is stationary or under motion. So if two metallic balls collide with each other, then aren't there motion between the two balls? Only then they will collide.
Yes, there is motion between the balls -- special relativity is happy to accept that. Relativity does away with motion in the absolute sense and considers only relative motion.
 
  • #5
bapowell said:
Yes, there is motion between the balls -- special relativity is happy to accept that. Relativity does away with motion in the absolute sense and considers only relative motion.
Special Relativity is also happy with a single ball that starts out at rest in its own Inertial Reference Frame (IRF) and then accelerates so that now it is in motion according to that same IRF. It doesn't have to be relative motion between two objects. Motion is relative to an IRF. In fact, the object doesn't even have to start out at rest in its own IRF, it can be an inertial object moving according to some arbitrary IRF.
 
  • #6
ghwellsjr said:
Are you asking about what happens after the two balls collide and instead of motion toward each other there is now motion away from each other?

If so, the two balls are not inertial. SR only states that it's impossible to determine if an inertial object is absolutely at rest or in motion. SR is not claiming that you cannot tell that an accelerated object experiences motion at some time.

So if we follow through on what Nugatory said, we cannot tell if each ball started out at rest and ended up in motion, or started out in motion and ended up at rest, or started out in motion and ended up in a different motion.
Sir,
How can the two balls be non- inertial as no external force is being exerted over the closed system. It all the inner forces that are being circulated.
 
  • #7
aditya ver.2.0 said:
Sir,
How can the two balls be non- inertial as no external force is being exerted over the closed system. It all the inner forces that are being circulated.

If the two balls collide and change directions, then there is no inertial frame in which one of the balls is at rest.
 
  • #8
Hi. aditya ver2.0. SR says we can choose IFRs so that one of them stands.
Ball A is still and Ball B is moving
Ball B is still and Ball A is moving
Ball A is moving and Ball B is moving
But it does not say
Ball A is still and Ball B is still
stands.
 
  • #9
aditya ver.2.0 said:
Sir,
How can the two balls be non- inertial as no external force is being exerted over the closed system. It all the inner forces that are being circulated.
I was talking about each ball individually being non-inertial throughout the scenario. They are each inertial at the beginning and up to the moment of impact and then they are each inertial after they collide and bounce away from each other but at the moment of impact, they are each non-inertial. Since you said the two balls were metallic, I thought you wanted them to bounce away from each other as a result of their collision.

And an important point that I was making in my posts is that there is a distinction between an Inertial Reference Frame that we use to describe the motions of the object(s) in a scenario and the inertial states of the object(s). However, I don't know if that was an issue that you are concerned about or not. Do you understand that "inertial" means not accelerating or not changing its state of motion? So if a ball that starts out inertial, traveling in a straight line at a constant speed, hits another object and either changes its speed and/or changes its direction, then it has accelerated and is no longer inertial? It doesn't matter whether you consider the force that accelerates the ball to be external or internal.
 
  • #10
aditya ver.2.0 said:
Sir,
How can the two balls be non- inertial as no external force is being exerted over the closed system. It all the inner forces that are being circulated.
Each ball experiences a force. Each ball accelerates according to an accelerometer attached to the ball. Each ball is non inertial.

The center of mass of the two balls is inertial, but the balls are not inertial. Similarly, a spinning wheel in free space is not inertial even though its center of mass is.
 

Related to Query regarding Special Relativity

1. What is Special Relativity?

Special Relativity is a theory proposed by Albert Einstein in 1905 that describes the relationship between space and time in the absence of gravity. It states that the laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion, and the speed of light is constant in all inertial frames of reference.

2. How is Special Relativity different from General Relativity?

Special Relativity only applies to objects in uniform motion, while General Relativity applies to all objects, including those in non-uniform motion and affected by gravity. Additionally, Special Relativity does not consider the effects of gravity, whereas General Relativity does.

3. What are some key principles of Special Relativity?

Some key principles of Special Relativity include the constancy of the speed of light, time dilation, length contraction, and the equivalence of mass and energy (E=mc^2). These principles have been confirmed through numerous experiments and have revolutionized our understanding of space and time.

4. What is the significance of the speed of light in Special Relativity?

The speed of light, denoted by "c", is a fundamental constant in Special Relativity. It is the maximum speed at which all objects and information can travel in the universe. This constant is crucial in understanding the behavior of space and time, and it has been shown to be a universal constant in all inertial frames of reference.

5. How does Special Relativity impact our everyday lives?

While Special Relativity may seem like a complex theory, its implications have greatly impacted our modern world. Technologies such as GPS, nuclear power, and particle accelerators all rely on the principles of Special Relativity. Additionally, it has helped shape our understanding of the universe and has led to numerous advancements in physics and engineering.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
937
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
311
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
84
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
902
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
811
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
43
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
60
Views
3K
Back
Top