Quarks Without Color: Investigating the Consequences of a Colorless Universe

  • Thread starter babtridge
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Colour
In summary, electron-positron annihilation supports the conjecture that 3 colour states exist for quarks. This number, introduced because certain wavefunctions (like that of the \Delta^{++})-particle) can exhibit "all equal" quantumnumbers, dictates that for each quark flavor there are three different EM interaction diagrams. If color does not exist, then there are only two diagrams, one for each quark flavor.
  • #1
babtridge
16
0
Hi there,
Could anybody please explain how electron-positron annihilation supports the conjecture that 3 colour states exist for quarks?
Plus in the Baryon 1/2 octet and 3/2 decuplet, what would be the corresponding set of states if colour did not exist, such that quarks of the same flavour were identical?

Thanks a lot in advance guys and gals...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
uhhhh i don't know how leptons can prove that 3 colour states exists.
 
  • #3
babtridge said:
Hi there,
Could anybody please explain how electron-positron annihilation supports the conjecture that 3 colour states exist for quarks?
Plus in the Baryon 1/2 octet and 3/2 decuplet, what would be the corresponding set of states if colour did not exist, such that quarks of the same flavour were identical?

Thanks a lot in advance guys and gals...

This has nothing to do with the existence of the colour-quantum-number. This number was introduced because certain wavefunctions (like that of the [tex]\Delta^{++}[/tex])-particle) could exhibit "all equal" quantumnumbers. In the case of the above mentioned particle the wavefunction consists out of three up quarks + three spin up-numbers + three 1s-energy levels. This kind of wave function does not obey the Pauli-exclusion rule and because of this, the wavefunction must be antisymmetric. In order to obey this anti-symmetry, colours were introduced.

regards
marlon
 
Last edited:
  • #4
babtridge said:
Hi there,
Could anybody please explain how electron-positron annihilation supports the conjecture that 3 colour states exist for quarks?
Do a Feynman diagram as follows. Going in you have an electron and a positron, that annihilate into a virtual photon; the photon then turns into a quark-antiquark pair that go out.

The idea is that for high enough energies, this diagram contributes to the total electron-positron cross section. Let's assume only the light quarks contribute, then you can sum up the amplitudes for annihilation into u and b quark/antiquark pairs and calculate the fraction of the time quarks are produced as opposed to a photon pair or a muon-antimuon. If color exists, then there are 3 diagrams as far as the EM interaction is concerned for each quark flavor; one for each color. This increases the fraction of producing baryons or mesons compared to the no-color case.
Plus in the Baryon 1/2 octet and 3/2 decuplet, what would be the corresponding set of states if colour did not exist, such that quarks of the same flavour were identical?
I do not have the time to work this out now; the idea is that you are now looking for quark wavefunctions that are antisymmetric wrt flavor and spin instead of symmetric. The spatial wavefunction is always symmetric in the ground state, and the color singlet wavefunction is always antisymmetric if it is included.

Edit: if you have Griffiths' book on elementary particles, he touches on this somewhere in the chapter on building baryon wavefunctions.
 
  • #5
Thanks for taking the time to help me out on this one...you've all made stuff a lot clearer.
Tekiteasy peeps!
 

Related to Quarks Without Color: Investigating the Consequences of a Colorless Universe

What if colour didn't exist?

Without colour, our perception of the world would be drastically different. Here are some frequently asked questions about this hypothetical scenario:

1. How would we see the world without colour?

Without colour, our vision would be limited to shades of black, white, and grey. We would not be able to distinguish between different colours and everything would appear in monochrome.

2. Would objects still have the same appearance without colour?

No, objects would appear very different without colour. For example, a red apple and a green apple would both appear as shades of grey, making it difficult to tell them apart.

3. How would this affect our daily lives?

Our daily lives would be greatly impacted without the use of colour. Many tasks, such as cooking and decorating, rely heavily on our ability to distinguish between different colours. It would also affect our emotions and how we perceive the world around us.

4. Would other animals be affected by the absence of colour?

Yes, other animals would also be affected by the lack of colour. Many animals use colour for survival, such as camouflage and attraction for mating. Without colour, these animals would have to rely on other senses for survival.

5. Is it possible for colour to not exist?

While it is difficult to imagine a world without colour, it is possible in theory. Colour is a result of how our brains interpret different wavelengths of light. Without this ability, colour would not exist for us. However, it is a fundamental aspect of our perception and the world around us, so it is unlikely that colour could ever truly cease to exist.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • Mechanics
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top