Proving the Wedge Product of 2 One-Forms is a 2-Form

In summary, the conversation was about showing that the wedge product of two one-forms is a 2-form and proving that it is a (0,2) tensor. The conversation also addressed the issue of sloppy notation and the commutativity of matrices in the context of tensor transformations. The solution to the problem was provided by Orodruin, who pointed out that the tensor components are all numbers and thus the product is commutative. The off-topic part of the discussion was moved to a separate thread.
  • #1
Silviu
624
11
Hello! I was trying to show that the wedge product of 2 one-forms is a 2-form. So we have ## (A \wedge B)_{\mu \nu} = A_\mu B_\nu - A_\nu B_\mu ##. So to show that this is a (0,2) tensor, we need to show that ##(A \wedge B)_{\mu' \nu'} = \Lambda_{\mu'}^\mu \Lambda_{\nu'}^\nu (A \wedge B)_{\mu \nu}##. But ##A_{\mu'} B_{\nu'} - A_{\nu'} B_{\mu'} = \Lambda_{\mu'}^\mu A_\mu \Lambda_{\nu'}^\nu B_\nu - \Lambda_{\nu'}^\nu A_\nu \Lambda_{\mu'}^\mu B_\mu ##. I am not sure how to proceed from here, as the matrices don't commute, so I can't bring the ##\Lambda## in the front. What should I do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What matrices? Those are just numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #3
Also again, be warned about this sloppy notation of indizes. You should put the prime on the symbol (or in addition to the symbol). Otherwise the equations don't make sense strictly speaking (I know that some unfortunate textbooks use this very dangerous notation). Also make sure that both the "vertical and horizontal" placement of the indices is accurate. For a 2nd-rank tensor the transformation law should be written as
$$T_{\mu \nu}'={\Lambda^{\rho}}_{\mu} {\Lambda^{\sigma}}_{\nu} T^{\rho \sigma}.$$
Concerning your question, Orodruin has given you the right hint. The tensor components are all numbers, and thus the product is the usual commutative product of real numbers!
 

Related to Proving the Wedge Product of 2 One-Forms is a 2-Form

What is a wedge product of two one-forms?

The wedge product is a mathematical operation that combines two one-forms (linear functions) to create a new type of object called a two-form. This operation is used in differential geometry and multivariable calculus to study curved spaces and surfaces.

What does it mean to prove the wedge product of two one-forms is a two-form?

Proving that the wedge product of two one-forms is a two-form means showing that the mathematical operation of combining two one-forms using the wedge product results in a two-form, which is a different type of object with unique properties and behaviors.

Why is it important to prove the wedge product of two one-forms is a two-form?

Proving the wedge product of two one-forms is a two-form is important because it is a fundamental concept in differential geometry and multivariable calculus. It allows us to define and manipulate two-forms, which are essential in studying curved spaces and surfaces.

What are some real-world applications of the wedge product of two one-forms?

The wedge product of two one-forms has many applications in physics, engineering, and computer graphics. It is used in the study of electromagnetic fields, fluid dynamics, and computer graphics rendering. It also plays a crucial role in the formulation of the laws of general relativity in physics.

What is the process for proving the wedge product of two one-forms is a two-form?

The process for proving the wedge product of two one-forms is a two-form involves using mathematical definitions and properties of one-forms and the wedge product to show that the resulting object satisfies the properties of a two-form. This typically involves manipulating equations and using mathematical reasoning to demonstrate the desired result.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
285
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
997
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
116
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
351
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top