Proving Closure of Set of Operators w/ Property P Under Addition

In summary, the conversation discusses how to show that a set of operators with a property P is closed under addition, specifically in the case of an infinite set. One general concept is to take an arbitrary sum of two operators and prove that it also satisfies P. However, there may be other techniques for proving this statement, as all techniques are ultimately some form of proof for the definition of "closed". Suggestions or references for alternative techniques are appreciated.
  • #1
Crot
15
0
Could you please give me a hint on how to show that a set of operators with a property P is closed under addition? In other words, how one could prove that a sum of any two operators from the set still possesses this property P. The set is assumed to be infinite.

Any references, comments, suggestions, etc. will be kindly appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2


It depends on the set of operators and on P.

One general concept: Take an arbitrary sum of two operators, show that the sum is an operator which satisfies P.
 
  • #3


Thank you for your answer. But, this concept is really too general.
Are there any other techniques?
 
  • #4


Your question is extremely general. Just one step more general would be "how do you prove a mathematical statement".

All techniques are some sort of this proof, as it is the definition of "closed".
 
  • #5


To prove that a set of operators with a property P is closed under addition, you will need to show that the sum of any two operators from the set also possesses the property P. This can be done by using the definition of closure and the properties of P.

First, let's define what it means for a set of operators to be closed under addition. A set of operators is closed under addition if, for any two operators A and B in the set, their sum A+B is also in the set.

Now, to prove that the sum of any two operators from the set possesses the property P, we can use the following steps:

1. Start by assuming that A and B are two arbitrary operators from the set with property P.

2. Use the definition of P to show that A+B also satisfies property P. This may involve using the properties of P and the specific properties of A and B.

3. Since A and B were arbitrary operators from the set, this proof holds for any two operators from the set. Therefore, the sum of any two operators from the set must also possess property P.

4. This proves that the set of operators with property P is closed under addition.

In the case of an infinite set, you will need to use a proof by induction or use the fact that the infinite set can be represented as a limit of a sequence of finite sets.

I recommend consulting a textbook on functional analysis or linear algebra for more detailed explanations and examples of proving closure under addition for sets of operators. Additionally, you can also refer to research papers or online resources for specific examples and applications of this concept.
 

Related to Proving Closure of Set of Operators w/ Property P Under Addition

What is "Proving Closure of Set of Operators w/ Property P Under Addition"?

"Proving Closure of Set of Operators w/ Property P Under Addition" is a mathematical concept that involves showing that a set of operators with a specific property, such as being commutative or associative, remains closed under addition. This means that when two operators from the set are added together, the result is also an operator in the set.

Why is proving closure important in mathematics?

Proving closure is important in mathematics because it allows us to make conclusions and perform operations with confidence. If a set of operators is closed under addition, we know that we can combine them in any order and the result will still be within the set. This makes it easier to solve complex problems and prove theorems.

What are some properties that a set of operators can have?

Some common properties that a set of operators can have include being commutative, associative, and distributive. Commutativity means that the order in which the operators are combined does not affect the result. Associativity means that the grouping of the operators does not affect the result. Distributivity means that the operators can be distributed over addition and multiplication.

How do you prove closure of a set of operators under addition?

To prove closure of a set of operators under addition, you must show that when two operators from the set are added together, the result is also an operator in the set. This can be done by using the properties of the operators and performing the addition to show that the result still satisfies the property. It is also important to show that all possible combinations of operators in the set result in an operator in the set.

What is an example of proving closure of a set of operators under addition?

An example of proving closure of a set of operators under addition would be showing that the set of even numbers is closed under addition. We can do this by taking any two even numbers, adding them together, and showing that the result is also an even number. For instance, 4 + 6 = 10, which is also an even number. We can also show that any combination of even numbers added together will result in an even number.

Similar threads

  • Differential Geometry
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top