Proving (A∪B)^n = (A∪B)∪(A∩B) for Natural N0s n

  • MHB
  • Thread starter solakis1
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Natural
In summary, we discussed the definition of A^{n+1}=A^n\cup A and proved that (A\cup B)^n =(A\cup B)\cup(A\cap B) for all natural numbers n using the definition. We also discussed the axioms of absorption and associativity and provided a proof for the axioms of absorption.
  • #1
solakis1
422
0
Given the definition: \(\displaystyle A^{n+1}=A^n\cup A\) then prove that:

\(\displaystyle (A\cup B)^n =(A\cup B)\cup(A\cap B)\) for all natural N0s n
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
solakis said:
Given the definition: \(\displaystyle A^{n+1}=A^n\cup A\)
What is $A^1$?

solakis said:
then prove that:

\(\displaystyle (A\cup B)^n =(A\cup B)\cup(A\cap B)\) for all natural N0s n
Hmm, why write $(A\cup B)\cup(A\cap B)$ since $A\cap B$ is included in $A\cup B$?
 
  • #3
Evgeny.Makarov said:
What is $A^1$?

Hmm, why write $(A\cup B)\cup(A\cap B)$ since $A\cap B$ is included in $A\cup B$?

\(\displaystyle A^1=A\)

Is by definition (or theorem):

1) \(\displaystyle x\in(A\cup B)\Longleftrightarrow x\in A\vee x\in B\)

......Or.......

2)\(\displaystyle x\in(A\cup B)\Longleftrightarrow (x\in A\vee x\in B)\vee (x\in A\wedge x\in B)\)
 
  • #4
solakis said:
\(\displaystyle A^1=A\)
Then $A^n=A$ for all $n$.

solakis said:
Is by definition (or theorem):

1) \(\displaystyle x\in(A\cup B)\Longleftrightarrow x\in A\vee x\in B\)

......Or.......

2)\(\displaystyle x\in(A\cup B)\Longleftrightarrow (x\in A\vee x\in B)\vee (x\in A\wedge x\in B)\)
Both.
 
  • #5
Evgeny.Makarov said:
Then $A^n=A$ for all $n$.

Both.

In that case if we put :

xεA=p, xεB= q,how would we prove :

(pvq)vr =pv(qvr)?

Since pvq <=> (pvq)v(p^q)
 
  • #6
solakis said:
In that case if we put :

xεA=p, xεB= q,how would we prove :

(pvq)vr =pv(qvr)?
Associativity of disjunction holds for all propositions, not necessarily x ∈ A and x ∈ B. The way of proving it depends on axiomatics. In Boolean algebra, for example, this is an axiom.
 
  • #7
Evgeny.Makarov said:
Associativity of disjunction holds for all propositions, not necessarily x ∈ A and x ∈ B. The way of proving it depends on axiomatics. In Boolean algebra, for example, this is an axiom.

By the way:

In the axioms you suggested in Wikipedia ,two of them can be proved using the other axioms.
Those are the axioms of absorption and the axioms of associativity.

I will prove the axioms of absorption and i will leave it to you to prove the axioms of associativity.proof:

1) x^(xvy)

2) (xv0)^(xvy)...using the axiom of identity:av0=a

3) xv(0^y).....using the axiom of distributivity: av(b^c) = (avb)^(avc)

4) xv(y^0)....using the axiom of commutativity: a^b=b^a

5) xv[(y^0)v0]...using the axiom of identity:av0=a

6) xv[(y^0)v(y^y')]...using the axiom of complements: a^a' = 0 (Note a' is the comlement of a)

7) xv[y^(0vy')].....using the axiom of distributivity : a^(bvc) = (a^b)v(a^c)

8) xv[y^(y'v0)].....using the axiom of commutativity: avb=bva

9) xv(y^y') ......using the axiom of identity: av0=a

10) xv0 ......using the axiom of complements :y^y'=0

11) x......using the axiom of identity: av0=aAlso due to the duolity principle we have:

xv(x^y)= x
 
  • #8
solakis said:
...
I will prove the axioms of absorption and i will leave it to you to prove the axioms of associativity...

I'm just curious, why are you leaving work to be done by Evgeny.Makarov?
 
  • #9
MarkFL said:
I'm just curious, why are you leaving work to be done by Evgeny.Makarov?

You mean always or just this time ?
 
  • #10
solakis said:
You mean always or just this time ?

Just this one particular instance, the part of your post that I quoted. I was just curious. :D
 

Related to Proving (A∪B)^n = (A∪B)∪(A∩B) for Natural N0s n

1. What is the formula for proving (A∪B)^n = (A∪B)∪(A∩B) for natural numbers n?

The formula for proving (A∪B)^n = (A∪B)∪(A∩B) for natural numbers n is:
(A∪B)^n = (A∪B) * (A∪B) * (A∪B) * ... * (A∪B)
where there are n copies of (A∪B) multiplied together.

2. How do you prove this formula using mathematical induction?

To prove this formula using mathematical induction, we must first prove the base case, which is n=1. This means proving that (A∪B)^1 = (A∪B)∪(A∩B).
Then, we assume that the formula holds for n=k, and use this assumption to prove that it also holds for n=k+1. This completes the proof by mathematical induction.

3. What are the steps for proving this formula by mathematical induction?

The steps for proving this formula by mathematical induction are:
1. Prove the base case, n=1.
2. Assume the formula holds for n=k.
3. Use this assumption to prove the formula holds for n=k+1.
4. Conclude that the formula holds for all natural numbers n.

4. Can you provide an example of proving this formula using mathematical induction?

Yes, for example, we can prove that (A∪B)^3 = (A∪B)∪(A∩B) by mathematical induction.
Base case: n=1
(A∪B)^1 = (A∪B) = (A∪B)∪(A∩B)
Assumption: The formula holds for n=k
(A∪B)^k = (A∪B)∪(A∩B)
Inductive step: n=k+1
(A∪B)^(k+1) = (A∪B)^k * (A∪B) = (A∪B)∪(A∩B) * (A∪B) = (A∪B)∪(A∩B∪A∪B) = (A∪B)∪(A∩B)
Therefore, by mathematical induction, the formula holds for all natural numbers n.

5. What is the significance of this formula in mathematics and science?

This formula is significant in mathematics and science because it shows the relationship between the union and intersection of two sets raised to a power. It also demonstrates the use of mathematical induction as a proof technique. This formula is commonly used in areas such as probability and statistics, as well as in computer science for algorithms and data structures.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
910
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
818
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
943
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
2
Replies
62
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top