Prove: Inequality of Sums of Square Roots of Positive Reals

  • Thread starter Saitama
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Inequality
In summary, the proof uses the AM-GM inequality and considers the case of ##x=\sqrt{\alpha}, \, \alpha\in\{a, b, c\}## in order to show that ##2x-x^2(3-x^2)\geq0##. This is then used to prove the given inequality by multiplying both sides by 2 and simplifying the resulting expression.
  • #1
Saitama
4,243
93

Homework Statement


Let ##a,b,c## be positive real numbers with sum 3. Prove that
[tex]\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b}+\sqrt{c} \geq ab+bc+ca[/tex]

Homework Equations


AM-GM inequality

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't really know how to start with. We are given ##a+b+c=3##.
Also, ##2(ab+bc+ca)=(a+b+c)^2-(a^2+b^2+c^2)## but this doesn't seem helpful here and I don't see how can I apply the AM-GM inequality here. :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Pranav-Arora said:

Homework Statement


Let ##a,b,c## be positive real numbers with sum 3. Prove that
[tex]\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b}+\sqrt{c} \geq ab+bc+ca[/tex]

Homework Equations


AM-GM inequality


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't really know how to start with. We are given ##a+b+c=3##.
Also, ##2(ab+bc+ca)=(a+b+c)^2-(a^2+b^2+c^2)## but this doesn't seem helpful here and I don't see how can I apply the AM-GM inequality here. :(
I think the general statement of the inequality is ##\forall x_i\in\mathbb{R}_+\cup\{0\} \, \frac{x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_n}{n}\geq\sqrt[n]{x_1x_2\cdots x_n}##.
I had to think about this, but...let's use your hint.

Evaluate ##2x-x^2(3-x^2)##. What does that imply about positive x?
Multiply both sides of the statement you need to prove. See where that gets you. :wink:
 
  • #3
Mandelbroth said:
I think the general statement of the inequality is ##\forall x_i\in\mathbb{R}_+\cup\{0\} \, \frac{x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_n}{n}\geq\sqrt[n]{x_1x_2\cdots x_n}##.
I had to think about this, but...let's use your hint.

Evaluate ##2x-x^2(3-x^2)##. What does that imply about positive x?
Multiply both sides of the statement you need to prove. See where that gets you. :wink:

Sorry for the late reply but I figured this out later. :smile:

The original inequality (to be proved) can be re-written as
[tex]a^2+b^2+c^2+2(\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b}+\sqrt{c}) \geq 9[/tex]
This inequality can be easily proved by AM-GM inequality.
[tex]a^2+\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{a} \geq 3a[/tex]
Hence proved.
 
  • #4
Pranav-Arora said:
Sorry for the late reply but I figured this out later. :smile:

The original inequality (to be proved) can be re-written as
[tex]a^2+b^2+c^2+2(\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b}+\sqrt{c}) \geq 9[/tex]
This inequality can be easily proved by AM-GM inequality.
[tex]a^2+\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{a} \geq 3a[/tex]
Hence proved.
I didn't think of that.

##\forall x\geq0, \, 2x−x^2(3−x^2)=(x−1)^2x(x+2)\geq0 \implies 2x \geq x^2(3−x^2)##.

If we multiply both sides of the original inequality by 2, we get ##2\sqrt{a}+2\sqrt{b}+2\sqrt{c}\geq 2ab+2bc+2ca = a(b+c)+b(a+c)+c(a+b) = a(3-a)+b(3-b)+c(3-c)##. The proof thus follows as an example of the first inequality by considering the case ##x=\sqrt{\alpha}, \, \alpha\in\{a, b, c\}##.
 

Related to Prove: Inequality of Sums of Square Roots of Positive Reals

1. What is the Inequality of Sums of Square Roots of Positive Reals?

The Inequality of Sums of Square Roots of Positive Reals states that for any set of positive real numbers, the sum of their square roots is always less than or equal to the square root of the sum of their squares.

2. How is this inequality proven?

This inequality can be proven using mathematical induction or by using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.

3. Why is this inequality important?

This inequality is important because it is a fundamental concept in mathematics and is often used in various mathematical proofs and applications, such as in calculus and optimization problems.

4. Can you provide an example of the inequality in action?

For example, if we have the positive real numbers 3, 4, and 5, the sum of their square roots is 3 + 2 + √5 = 3 + 2 + 2.236 = 7.236, whereas the square root of the sum of their squares is √(3^2 + 4^2 + 5^2) = √(9 + 16 + 25) = √50 = 7.071. Since 7.236 is less than or equal to 7.071, the inequality holds.

5. Are there any exceptions to this inequality?

No, there are no exceptions to this inequality. It holds true for all sets of positive real numbers.

Similar threads

  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
604
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
881
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
968
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
522
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
561
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
819
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top