Prove AM-GM Inequality: What Values to Use?

In summary, the question asks what values we should use to prove that the inequality $(4x+10y)^3\ge1080x^2y$ holds.
  • #1
delc1
9
0
Could someone please help me with this question:

View attachment 2476

What values are we meant to use to prove this inequality?

many thanks
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    5.9 KB · Views: 84
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Try and put things into a form where you can use the AM-GM inequality. Here you have a power of three on the LHS, which means you're probably going to have to consider AM-GM with three terms. So we try this (note the inequality sign doesn't change because the cube root function is strictly increasing over the positive reals):

$$4x + 10y \geq \sqrt[3]{1080 x^2 y}$$

But we only have two variables here! But look: there's an $x^2$ term on the RHS, and we know that here the RHS will be the geometric mean (and the LHS the arithmetic mean), so that means we probably have two terms in $x$ and one in $y$. First let's put the LHS in the right form as an actual mean, so we get:

$$\frac{12x + 30y}{3} \geq \sqrt[3]{1080 x^2 y}$$

That's looking a bit closer to what we need. So now we want to write the above in the form below where we can directly apply AM-GM:

$$\frac{ax + bx + cy}{3} \geq \sqrt[3]{abc x^2 y}$$

Can you see why once we find good values of $a$, $b$, $c$ we will be able to apply AM-GM directly? (hint: $abcx^2y = (ax)(bx)(cy)$). Can you now solve for $a$, $b$ and $c$ and conclude? (hint: $c$ is already given, so you have a system of two equations in two variables).
 
  • #3
Hi delc1,

First I played with the sum of $4x$ and $10y$ and applied the AM-GM and I ended up with $\dfrac{4x+10y}{2}\ge (4x\cdot10y)^{\dfrac{1}{2}}_{\phantom{i}}$. This gave us the idea that if we wanted the power of 3 on one side of the inequaliy sign, we must apply the AM-GM inequality to a total of 3 terms.

Note that $1080=2^33^35$ and that the RHS of the inequality$(4x+10y)^3\ge1080x^2y$ consists of two $x$ and and one $y$, I know I must separate the $4x$ into the sum of $2x+2x$ and by applying the AM-GM to the terms $2x,\,2x,\,10y$, I get:

$\dfrac{2x+2x+10y}{3}\ge (2x\cdot2x\cdot10y)^{\dfrac{1}{3}}_{\phantom{i}}$, or equivalently,

$(4x+10y)^3\ge1080x^2y$
 
  • #4
anemone said:
Hi delc1,

First I played with the sum of $4x$ and $10y$ and applied the AM-GM and I ended up with $\dfrac{4x+10y}{2}\ge (4x\cdot10y)^{\dfrac{1}{2}}_{\phantom{i}}$. This gave us the idea that if we wanted the power of 3 on one side of the inequaliy sign, we must apply the AM-GM inequality to a total of 3 terms.

Note that $1080=2^33^35$ and that the RHS of the inequality$(4x+10y)^3\ge1080x^2y$ consists of two $x$ and and one $y$, I know I must separate the $4x$ into the sum of $2x+2x$ and by applying the AM-GM to the terms $2x,\,2x,\,10y$, I get:

$\dfrac{2x+2x+10y}{3}\ge (2x\cdot2x\cdot10y)^{\dfrac{1}{3}}_{\phantom{i}}$, or equivalently,

$(4x+10y)^3\ge1080x^2y$

Thanks all, the help is always appreciated!
 
  • #5


The AM-GM inequality states that for any set of positive real numbers, the arithmetic mean is greater than or equal to the geometric mean. In other words, for a set of numbers {x1, x2,...,xn}, we have:

(x1 + x2 + ... + xn)/n ≥ (x1x2...xn)^(1/n)

To prove this inequality, we can use any set of positive real numbers. Let's take the simplest case of two numbers, x and y. The AM-GM inequality would then be:

(x + y)/2 ≥ √(xy)

To prove this, we can use algebraic manipulation. We start with the left side of the inequality and square both sides:

(x + y)^2/4 ≥ xy

Expanding the left side, we get:

x^2 + 2xy + y^2 ≥ 4xy

Subtracting 4xy from both sides, we get:

x^2 - 2xy + y^2 ≥ 0

This can be rewritten as:

(x - y)^2 ≥ 0

Which is always true since the square of any real number is always positive. Therefore, we have proven that (x + y)/2 ≥ √(xy) for any positive real numbers x and y.

This same method can be used for any number of variables, n. We can use induction to prove the AM-GM inequality for n+1 variables by assuming it is true for n variables and then adding the (n+1)th variable to the set.

In conclusion, any set of positive real numbers can be used to prove the AM-GM inequality. The key is to use algebraic manipulation to show that the left side is always greater than or equal to the right side.
 

Related to Prove AM-GM Inequality: What Values to Use?

1. What is the AM-GM Inequality?

The AM-GM (Arithmetic Mean-Geometric Mean) Inequality is a fundamental mathematical inequality that states that the arithmetic mean of a set of non-negative real numbers is always greater than or equal to the geometric mean of the same set of numbers. In other words, it shows that the average of a set of numbers is always greater than or equal to the product of the same set of numbers.

2. Why is the AM-GM Inequality important?

The AM-GM Inequality has many important applications in mathematics, including optimization problems, number theory, and probability. It is also a powerful tool for proving other mathematical theorems and inequalities.

3. How is the AM-GM Inequality proved?

The AM-GM Inequality can be proved using various methods, including induction, calculus, and algebraic manipulation. One common proof method involves using the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality and the convexity of the logarithm function.

4. What values can be used to prove the AM-GM Inequality?

The AM-GM Inequality can be proved for any set of non-negative real numbers. However, it is often used in the context of positive real numbers, as the inequality is not necessarily true for negative numbers or non-real numbers.

5. How is the AM-GM Inequality used in real life?

The AM-GM Inequality has many real-life applications, such as in finance, where it can be used to optimize investments, and in engineering, where it can be used to find the most efficient design for a given problem. It is also used in physics and chemistry to model and solve various problems.

Similar threads

  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
149
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
4
Views
343
Replies
71
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
603
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top