Is the Big Bang Theory Really Wrong?

  • Thread starter Imparcticle
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Big bang
In summary, the conversation discusses an article that argues against the Big Bang theory. The person who found the article only briefly read it and noticed that it referenced outdated information. They suggest doing more research before discussing the article further.
  • #1
Imparcticle
573
4
I found an intriguing article (well seemingly intriguing; I didn't get to finish reading it) that argues against the BB:
http://www.angelfire.com/az/BIGBANGisWRONG/
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
My first impression was "this must have been written some time ago", as there were several references to apparent contradictions that have been resolved for several years now. Indeed, one of the key links on this page is to an article dated 1977 (!); another has references that are predominantly pre-1990 (many classics from the 1920s and 1930s; nothing wrong with that, just that some of the more recent, more accurate observations would have been nice).

If there's anything specific in this article you'd like to follow up on - after you've done some research yourself (google is a good assistant), just ask.

Otherwise, file this under 'nice try; pity that it didn't match observations' :tongue:
 

1. Why do some scientists believe the Big Bang theory is wrong?

Some scientists believe the Big Bang theory is wrong because it is unable to explain certain observations and phenomena, such as the horizon problem and the flatness problem. Additionally, the theory relies on several assumptions and has not been able to be fully tested or proven.

2. What evidence supports the idea that the Big Bang theory may be incorrect?

There are several pieces of evidence that suggest the Big Bang theory may be incorrect, such as the unexpected distribution of galaxies and the existence of dark matter and dark energy. These observations do not fit with the predictions of the Big Bang theory.

3. Can the Big Bang theory be disproven?

As with any scientific theory, the Big Bang theory can never be fully disproven. However, new evidence and observations may lead to modifications or even the creation of a completely new theory that better explains the origins of the universe.

4. If the Big Bang theory is incorrect, what other theories are there for the origins of the universe?

There are several alternative theories for the origins of the universe, such as the Steady State theory, the Oscillating universe theory, and the Multiverse theory. These theories offer different explanations for the observed phenomena and may provide a better understanding of the universe.

5. Does rejecting the Big Bang theory mean rejecting all of modern cosmology?

No, rejecting the Big Bang theory does not mean rejecting all of modern cosmology. While the Big Bang theory is a cornerstone of modern cosmology, there are other theories and models that can still accurately explain and predict many aspects of the universe. The rejection of one theory does not discredit the entire field of cosmology.

Similar threads

B Expanding Universe -- What is it expanding into?
    • Cosmology
Replies
20
Views
2K
A An article on Big Bang theory contradictions
    • Cosmology
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Did James Webb cast serious doubt on the Big Bang?
    • Cosmology
Replies
15
Views
1K
I Does the Cosmological Principle in any way underpin Big Bang Theory?
    • Cosmology
Replies
33
Views
1K
I Is it time to take the 'bang' out of the Big Bang?
    • Cosmology
Replies
4
Views
918
I Why didn't the Big Bang form a Black Hole?
    • Cosmology
Replies
7
Views
853
B Rate of the expansion of the Universe and the Big Bang
    • Cosmology
Replies
11
Views
2K
B 83 quasars right up against the Event Horizon
    • Cosmology
Replies
6
Views
2K
B Lithium problem in Big Bang nucleosynthesis?
    • Cosmology
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Will the Big Rip basically be the Big Bang for the next universe?
    • Cosmology
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top