To see there is easier than to be there

  • Thread starter bothnicum
  • Start date
In summary, Speculum Temporis is a partial solution that could be used to see what has happened in the past. It would require a very big mirror to work, and it is still unclear if it exists in the light year range.
  • #1
bothnicum
14
0
Speculum Temporis - a partial solution?

All the pictures you can see in a mirror are messages from the past.

Photons must first travel from the object under survey to the mirror and back to the observer. Your do not think of that in the bathroom. But imagine that the mirror is located at the distance of one light year, the image you could see would be two years old.

If all celestial bodies besides black holes are reflective, at least some of the photons we are detecting by watching the sky, must be reflections from our very own history. By tuning at the distance of N ly's, you could watch direct broadcast of what happened 2N years ago.

This would help us to evaluate where to travel.

I think this could possibly work for some signals in the timeframe of minutes inside our solar system. But could it be possible in the timeframe of years or hundred years for any kind of reflections? What do You think?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well it's hard to think of an astronomical body that is as good a reflector as a mirror - one that you could see shapes for example. Probably the best reflector in the inner solar system is Venus, and that has the kind of reflectivity of white clouds. Very bright but no detail.


Since natural bodies are not likely to work, let's consider artificial bodies. Could we put a mirror out in space and arrange to see our past in that? Possibly, but it would have to be a very big mirror. Astronomers just recently managed to get an image of a planet of another star. All the other planets have been discovered from their gravitational effects on their stars. The image is just a blob, below the level of real resolution. But suppose future telescopes can do a few orders of magnitude better. Then maybe a planet sized mirror would work. But of course the image would be of Earth as seen from space. We could maybe see how the clouds moved forty years ago but not the people.

Sigh, more technology. Suppose the solve that problem...
 
  • #3
Yes, it is hard to find an ideal mirror in space.

But let me ask the other way round:

- What is the most distant object in space we can get a radar signal back?
 
  • #4
I don't know the answer to that. That would be an excellent question to ask on the Astronomy forum.
 
  • #6
Good work. I'll be talking to you.
 
  • #7
Nereid answered at General Astronomy & Cosmology -forum:

" AFAIK, Saturn, its rings and moon Titan hold the record:
http://www.aas.org/publications/baa...dps2002/109.htm
http://www.news.cornell.edu/Chronic...ydrocarbon.html

The distance? >1 billion km
"

So it takes 2.25 hours to get a reflected signal back from Titan. By analysing the reflected signal we can conclude (among other things) that someone was experimenting with a high energy radar down on the Earth more than two hours ago. Also if there were, say 5 seconds, black out in the power production system of the sun. We could observe its propagation through the planets so that we could see the black out in Pluto about 10 hours later.

Thus far we can say that yes 'Speculum Temporis' is observable in solar dimensions.

But does it exist in light year range? Why not - but the signal must be extremely weak. We probably must be able to catch single photons. This would have been totally impossible 20 years ago. But today we rapidly approaching that extreme. See for example "A broadband superconducting detector suitable for use in large arrays" by Peter K. Day et al in NATURE |VOL 425 | 23 OCTOBER 2003.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
To see is a progress

AS the progress , the time is a period, sorry it isn't a time travel question,but to see the past image is truth. it is a fun question.
 

What does "To see there is easier than to be there" mean?

"To see there is easier than to be there" is a common saying that means it is often easier to observe or understand something from a distance or from an outsider's perspective, rather than experiencing it firsthand.

Where did the phrase "To see there is easier than to be there" originate from?

The origin of this phrase is not clear, but it has been used in various forms and contexts throughout history, including in literature and philosophy.

Is "To see there is easier than to be there" always true?

No, this phrase is not always true. While it may be easier to observe or understand something from a distance, there are certain experiences that can only be truly understood by being there and experiencing it firsthand.

How can this phrase be applied in scientific research?

In scientific research, this phrase can be applied by using various methods of observation, such as experiments, surveys, and data analysis, to gain a better understanding of a phenomenon or concept. However, it is important to also consider the limitations of observation and the importance of firsthand experience in certain situations.

Are there any other similar sayings or phrases related to "To see there is easier than to be there"?

Yes, there are other similar sayings and phrases, such as "Hindsight is 20/20" or "Seeing is believing," which convey the idea that it is easier to understand something after the fact or by seeing it for oneself.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
15
Views
236
  • Other Physics Topics
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
55
Views
1K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
2
Replies
57
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
687
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
553
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
98
Views
2K
Back
Top