Proofs for Two Sets of Questions

  • Thread starter TheMathsDude
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proofs Sets
In summary, the Maths Dude explains that if two sets are equal, then each set is a subset of the other. Similarly, if a function is injective, then the function is also injective. Finally, he provides a proof for the first two statements.
  • #1
TheMathsDude
1
0
Hey guys,

I've got two sets of questions here both requiring proofs.

Here is a little progress I made with Question Two part c)
f=({a,1},{b,1},{c,2},{d,2}) , A={a,c} & B={b,d}
f(A)/f(B) = emptyset & f(A/B)={1,2}

Any help with the other two parts to Question Two/Three would be great.

Many Thanks,
The Maths Dude
 

Attachments

  • maths1.JPG
    maths1.JPG
    27.8 KB · Views: 487
  • maths2.JPG
    maths2.JPG
    32.6 KB · Views: 516
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For problem 1, two parts ask you to prove a set is subset of another set and one asks you to prove two sets are equal. The standard method is to use the definitions: A is a subset of B if and only if every member of A is a member of B. Two sets A and B are equal if each is a subset of the other: if every member of A is a member of B and vice-versa.

For example, the second question that f(A intersect B) is a subset of f(A) intersect f(B). Okay, start by saying "If y is in f(A intersect) then there exist x in A intersect B such that y= f(x). Since x is in A intersect B, then either x is in A or x is in B. If x is in A, then f(x)= y is in f(A) and so in f(A) intersect f(B). If x is in A, then f(x)= y is in f(B) and so in f(A) intersect f(B).

The second problem asks about "injective" and "surjective": use the definitions! A function, f:A->B is injective (also called "one to one") if and only if f(x)= f(y) only if x= y. f:A->B is surjective (also called "onto") if and only if for every y in B, there exist x in A such that f(x)= y.

For example, with f:A->B, g:B-> C, a) i) asks you to prove "If g o f is injective, then f is injective."
I might do this by "indirect proof" or "proof by contradiction". Suppose f is not injective. Then there exist x, y in A, [itex]x\ne y[/itex], such that f(x)= f(y) (in B). Call that common value u: f(x)= f(y)= u. Since g is a function, g(u) is a single value. Call that v. Then g o f(x)= g(f(x))= g(u)= v and g o f(y)= g(f(y))= g(u)= v. That is, g o f(x)= g o f(y) contradicting the fact that g o f is injective.

The second part of this is basically the same except that we have "is NOT injective" or "is NOT surjective". Use the fact that the contrapositive of a theorem is true if and only if the theorem is true. The contrapositive of the statement "if p then q" is "if NOT q then NOT p". The contrapositive of the statement "if NOT p then NOT q" is "if q then p".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
supose [tex]A =\left\{a_1,a_2,a_3,...,a_n\right\} \ and \ B=\left\{b_1,b_2,b_3,...,b_m\right\}[/tex]

the elements of [tex]A\cup B[/tex] are the domain of the function, while the elements of [tex]f(A\cup B)[/tex] are obviously the image

definition of function:

For each element of the domain there are only one element of the image
for any element of the image there is one or more than one element of the domain

Now its easy to see that if all elements of A and B are different, the image of A + the image of B = the image of [tex]A\cup B[/tex].

For the equal elements, if [tex]a_i = b_j[/tex] for some i,j = 1,2,3,4,5..., they must have the same image

Now its easy to see that if all elements of A and B are the same, the image of A + the image of B = the image of [tex]A\cup B[/tex].
 
  • #4
To make more clear, if some of the elements of A and B are equal, and some of them are different, we can think in 3 different sub-sets such that the sub-set C contain only the elements in A that are not in B, the subset D contain only the elements in both A and B, and the sub-set E contain only the elements that are not in A.

[tex]A\cup B = C\cup D\cup E[/tex] and by the definitions above you are able to conclude that [tex]f(A\cup B) = f(A) + f(B) [/tex]
 
  • #5
How do we prove:
If A is a subset of B then f(A) is subset of f(B) ?
 
  • #6
How do we prove:
If A is a subset of B then f(A) is subset of f(B) ?
 
  • #7
Take an arbitrary element of f(A) and show that it's in f(B). Also, please make your own thread, instead of bumping one that's over 2 years old.
 

Related to Proofs for Two Sets of Questions

1. What is a proof for two sets of questions?

A proof for two sets of questions is a mathematical or logical demonstration that shows the relationship or equality between two sets of questions.

2. How do you construct a proof for two sets of questions?

To construct a proof for two sets of questions, you must first clearly define the two sets and the relationship or equality you are trying to prove. Then, you must use logical or mathematical reasoning to show that the relationship or equality holds true for all elements in both sets.

3. What are the different types of proofs for two sets of questions?

There are several types of proofs for two sets of questions, including direct proof, indirect proof (also known as proof by contradiction), proof by contrapositive, and proof by mathematical induction.

4. Why are proofs for two sets of questions important?

Proofs for two sets of questions are important because they allow us to verify the validity of mathematical or logical statements, and to establish new knowledge based on existing information. They also help us to identify any errors or inconsistencies in our reasoning.

5. Can a proof for two sets of questions be wrong?

Yes, a proof for two sets of questions can be wrong if there are errors in the logical or mathematical reasoning used, or if the initial assumptions or definitions are incorrect. It is important to carefully check each step of a proof to ensure its accuracy.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
9
Views
942
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top