Proof of the preservation of normalizability of the wavefunction

In summary, "Proof of the preservation of normalizability of the wavefunction" is a mathematical demonstration that shows how the wavefunction in quantum mechanics remains normalized throughout time. It is important to prove this preservation because it confirms the validity of quantum mechanics and allows for accurate predictions and calculations of probabilities. The preservation is proven through mathematical techniques, simulations, and experimental data. Its implications include a better understanding of quantum behavior and practical applications in fields such as quantum computing.
  • #1
Ahmad Kishki
159
13
p. 12 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by Griffiths
Equation 1.25: the differential operatot was factored. This to me seems like a mathematical trick or due to amazing foresight, but is there any underlying/guiding theory for this factorisation?
Equation 1.27: the wavefunction was assumed to be zero at infinity which to me seems a bit weird, since by this assumption we enforced normalizability and got the answer we fabricated, so is my criticism valid? Is there a more rigorous proof?

The image of the book is enclosed below.

Thanks :)

<a href='http://i.imgur.com/WSUwLhM' title=''><img src='http://i.imgur.com/WSUwLhM.jpg' alt='' title='Hosted by imgur.com' /></a>

(I don't know why the image thumbnail isn't working)
[PLAIN]http://<a [/PLAIN] href='http://i.imgur.com/WSUwLhM' [/PLAIN] title=''><img src='http://i.imgur.com/WSUwLhM.jpg' alt='' title='Hosted by imgur.com' /></a>[/PLAIN]
[PLAIN]http://<a [/PLAIN] href='http://i.imgur.com/WSUwLhM' [/PLAIN] title=''><img src='http://i.imgur.com/WSUwLhM.jpg' alt='' title='Hosted by imgur.com' /></a>[/PLAIN]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'm not exactly sure what your question is. We assume that initially,

[itex]\int |\psi|^2 dx = 1[/itex]

So we assume that it starts off normalized, and that [itex]\psi \rightarrow 0[/itex] as [itex]x \rightarrow \pm \infty[/itex]

Then we prove, based on the assumption that it is true at time [itex]t=0[/itex], that it will be true for all time.
 
  • #3
The question is, how to prove that the wave function is normalized to 1 for all times, if it was normalized to 1 at the initial time ##t=0##.

The answer is: That follows from the Schrödinger equation and the self-adjointness of the Hamiltonian. Working in position representation ("wave mechanics") it reads
$$\mathrm{i} \partial_t \psi(t,\vec{x})=\hat{H} \psi(t,\vec{x}).$$
Here and in the following I use "natural units", where ##\hbar=1##.

The self-adjointness of the Hamiltonian means that for all square-integrable wave functions
$$\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \psi_1(\vec{x})^* \hat{H} \psi_2(\vec{x})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} [\hat{H} \psi_1(\vec{x})]^* \psi_2(\vec{x}).$$
Now you can prove that the norm of the wave function is conserved under the time evolution following from the Schrödinger equation:
$$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \psi^*(t,\vec{x}) \psi(t,\vec{x}) = \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \left [\partial_t \psi^*(t,\vec{x}) \psi(t,\vec{x}) + \psi^*(t,\vec{x}) \partial_t \psi(t,\vec{x}) \right ].$$
Now from the Schrödinger equation and its complex conjugate this gives
$$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \psi^*(t,\vec{x}) \psi(t,\vec{x}) = \mathrm{i} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \left [(\hat{H} \psi)^* \psi-\psi^* \hat{H} \psi \right ]=0.$$
Thus the norm is preserved under time evolution and thus, if the wave function is normalized to 1 at any time it stays so. This must be so from the physical point of view, because the probality to find the particle somewhere in the whole universe is always 1 (because in non-relativistic physics particles usually are not destroyed in interactions in contrast to relativistic physics, where the creation and annihilation of particle-antiparticle pairs and similar processes are the usual business :-)).
 
  • Like
Likes Ahmad Kishki

Related to Proof of the preservation of normalizability of the wavefunction

1. What is "Proof of the preservation of normalizability of the wavefunction"?

"Proof of the preservation of normalizability of the wavefunction" refers to a mathematical demonstration that shows how the wavefunction in quantum mechanics remains normalized, or sums to one, throughout time. This is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics, as it ensures that the probability of finding a particle in a certain state remains constant over time.

2. Why is it important to prove the preservation of normalizability of the wavefunction?

Proving the preservation of normalizability of the wavefunction is important because it confirms the validity of quantum mechanics as a predictive theory. It also helps to ensure the accuracy of experimental results and allows for the calculation of probabilities for various quantum events.

3. How is the preservation of normalizability of the wavefunction proven?

The proof of the preservation of normalizability of the wavefunction is typically done by using mathematical techniques, such as integration or differential equations, to show that the wavefunction remains normalized at all times. This can also be demonstrated using numerical simulations and experimental data.

4. What are the implications of the preservation of normalizability of the wavefunction?

The preservation of normalizability of the wavefunction has significant implications in understanding the behavior of particles at the quantum level. It allows us to accurately predict the probability of a particle being in a certain state and helps to explain phenomena such as quantum tunneling and superposition.

5. Does the preservation of normalizability of the wavefunction have any practical applications?

The preservation of normalizability of the wavefunction has many practical applications, particularly in the field of quantum computing. It allows for the accurate and efficient calculation of probabilities in quantum algorithms, which can have important implications in fields such as cryptography and data encryption.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
2
Views
5K
Back
Top