My last contributions to physics

  • Thread starter eljose79
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Physics
In summary: Anyway, back to your problem. You'll need to become affiliated with a university or sponsored by a faculty member. It's as simple as that. You obviously know the rules, and you seem like a smart person, so I cannot figure out why you don't get serious and do what you need to do. But could you please give it a rest about what "snobs" the arXiv people are? I, for one, am thoroughly sick of reading about it.Well, that just shows how out-of-touch with modern physics you are! Professors no longer need to worry about poking anyone in the eye with those long pointers, there are laser pointers now, which only leads to them blinding themselves
  • #1
eljose79
1,518
1
I am feed up there is no good journal to publihs your ideas because they are alll f... snobs and don,t let you publish anyting unless you are steven weinberg or something like that and it arxiv.org you must have an university account to publish your works...i give up physics and maths is imposible to understand and have nobody to explain it, these are my last contributions perhpas some of them will appear puyblished by some snob in a snobish physics journal:

a)Complex trajectories in Bohmian mechancs":=an explication to how compelx trajectories could explain normal and bohmian mechanics...in fact there are trajectories but are complex x(t)=a(t)+ib(t) and how quantum mechanics can be reduced to optics.


b)Quantization of arbitrary hamiltonians:"=in this work the quantization to arbitrary hamiltonian is epxlained ..how you could quantizy an arbitrary Hamiltonian
 

Attachments

  • nuevo documento de microsoft word.doc
    26.5 KB · Views: 403
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
sorry..for my bad words.

-Sorry..i must apologize for my bad works in fact i feel depressed as perhaps i will never be a good physicist or mathematician (i have only a degree on physics)..i feel very insignificant in this world in fact i had no luck and no one wanted to publish my files (the Pi(x) function and others) so this forum is my last chance to express my ideas i do not know if they are right or wrong.
 
  • #3
its ok dude, I wonder why people haven't reply to this thread yet. But you just have to keep trying. Also, its also not advisable to get too attached to our theories and those guys at the journals might have a reason for not publishing them.

But i think its too early to give up, just got to keep on going...
 
  • #4
eljose79 said:
I am feed up there is no good journal to publihs your ideas because they are alll f... snobs

...i give up physics and maths is imposible to understand and have nobody to explain it,

Surely the contradiction in these two statements exemplifies the problem. If you don't understand math and physics and need somebody to explain it to you, then why do you think you are able to produce publishable work? You'll need to continue your formal studies if you'd like to reach that level of accomplishment. You'll also have to work more on your written English skills if you wish to publish in English language journals some day. Both can be accomplished at the same time through more formal education.
 
  • #5
misogynisticfeminist said:
I wonder why people haven't reply to this thread yet.

Oh I don't know, maybe it's because he's been whining about this since he got here.

Cases in point:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=14422
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8910
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=7396
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=6659
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=4562
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=4079
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=4010
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=3439
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=3444

eljose:

If you want to get published, you'll have to become affiliated with a university or sponsored by a faculty member. It's as simple as that. You obviously know the rules, and you seem like a smart person, so I cannot figure out why you don't get serious and do what you need to do. But could you please give it a rest about what "snobs" the arXiv people are? I, for one, am thoroughly sick of reading about it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
eljose79 said:
I am feed up there is no good journal to publihs your ideas because they are alll f... snobs ...i give up physics and maths is imposible to understand ...some snob in a snobish physics journal...in fact there are trajectories but are complex

Quite right. Snobs, the lot of them. Never met one who didn't wear a top hat and monocle. Ninnies, every one...
 
  • #8
the number 42 said:
Quite right. Snobs, the lot of them. Never met one who didn't wear a top hat and monocle.

LOL, really? The ones I meet wear graduation attire and carry lecturing pointers. :rofl:
 
  • #9
Tom Mattson said:
LOL, really? The ones I meet wear graduation attire and carry lecturing pointers. :rofl:

Well, that just shows how out-of-touch with modern physics you are! Professors no longer need to worry about poking anyone in the eye with those long pointers, there are laser pointers now, which only leads to them blinding themselves (and not others) when they look at the wrong end to see if it's on. :rofl:
 
  • #10
eljose I really feel for you. I can't even do most of the math required in advanced physics and don't understand your papers, but I've been published 5 times. Seems unfair doesn't it?
 
  • #11
this thread has been a complete waste of time, I'm ashamed I took the time to read it. Please grow up.
 
  • #12
tribdog said:
eljose I really feel for you. I can't even do most of the math required in advanced physics and don't understand your papers, but I've been published 5 times. Seems unfair doesn't it?

It does seem unfair. But isn't that the pinnacle of childish talk? "That's not fair!". Grow up with it. Be a mature adult. If you were really intelligent, you would've told yourself this numerous times. (to eljose)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
Yes lots of things in this world do seem very much so on fair, but that’s when you must make a decision. To either give up, or walk alone. I made the decision to walk alone and investigate paths which were not explored many generations ago. I like your idea of explaining quantum mechanics by the use of optical science. I suggest if you examine this path at some point note what tagging does in slit experiments. It raises an interesting question, about if there exists a primary force which has not been observed beforehand which travels at a dimensional velocity versus a maximum field velocity used. On that note I wish you the best of luck in your theories, I myself believe theorists who rely on a probabilistic model of reality are not trying hard enough. Well probability is a good thing but nowadays it’s greatly overused and has convoluted thing too much.
 
  • #14
Hii eljose79,
Where are your papers?
Can you post the Abstracts here?
Has Pi(x) got something to do with 3.1415926535897932384626433... ?

Ashfaque
 
  • #15
ashfaque said:
Has Pi(x) got something to do with 3.1415926535897932384626433... ?

The Pi(x) he's referring to is the prime counting function [tex]\pi(x)=\sum_{p\leq x,\ p\ prime}}1=\text{number of primes less than or equal to x}[/tex]

Have a search for posts by eljose79, he's posted links to some of his papers before.
 
  • #16
ashfaque said:
Hii eljose79,
Where are your papers?
Can you post the Abstracts here?
Has Pi(x) got something to do with 3.1415926535897932384626433... ?

Ashfaque

Since shmoe pointed out there were links to some of his "papers," I took a quick look (I guess I'm bored today). I don't know anything about pure mathematics research, so have no idea whether there is any value to the proof presented, but there are pretty serious problems with the format, such as the abstract is worded in a very wishy-washy way, like a high schooler would write an abstract for a lab report; there is NO introduction, and there are NO references (perusing some other math journals online for some comparison of standard formatting of articles for that field, I'm not sure if math journals require any form of discussion beyond the explanation of the proof, but there is none of that either). It's very clear why nobody is reading what he sends to them. If I received something like that unsolicited, I'd toss it straight to the trash bin. If I were a journal editor, thus not allowed to toss it straight to the trash bin, I wouldn't even waste the time of my reviewers and would return it unreviewed until it was submitted with the proper formatting.

Well, eljose has been looking for an honest answer about what is wrong with his paper, and that's what I see as wrong before even getting to the point of looking at the math included in it.
 
  • #17
Most of what he has written that I've read is mathematically good, it just isn't new,. The techniques have been in use for well over 50 years, some even published in a textbook by Wiener in 1952 I think. The idea of using transforms on these functions is old hat, that's why no one will bother with them even if they were better presented, and the unsubtantiated claims for "solving pi(x)" say were removed.
 

1. What were your last contributions to physics?

My last contributions to physics were in the field of quantum mechanics, specifically in the study of entanglement and its applications in quantum computing.

2. How did your contributions impact the field of physics?

My contributions have helped advance our understanding of quantum mechanics and its potential applications in technology. They have also opened up new avenues for research in the field.

3. Can you explain the concept of entanglement and its significance in your contributions?

Entanglement is a quantum phenomenon where two or more particles become connected in such a way that the state of one particle affects the state of the other, regardless of the distance between them. In my contributions, I have explored how entanglement can be used to perform complex computations in quantum computers.

4. What inspired you to focus on entanglement in your research?

I have always been fascinated by the strange and counterintuitive nature of quantum mechanics. The concept of entanglement, in particular, intrigued me and I saw its potential for advancing technology and our understanding of the universe.

5. What do you hope to achieve in the future with your contributions to physics?

I hope to continue my research in quantum mechanics and make further contributions to the field. My ultimate goal is to help pave the way for practical applications of quantum computing and other technologies that utilize entanglement.

Similar threads

I Testing string/m-theory extra dimensions prediction
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
10
Views
2K
Recent papers on self-dual loop quantum black holes
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
28
Views
4K
Sifting the 3rd qtr QG papers
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
24
Views
7K
A review of dowsing: Evidence for and against
    • General Discussion
Replies
11
Views
25K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236)
    • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
7
Views
2K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236)
    • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
9
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top