Concervation and Corresopndence Law

  • Thread starter yquantum
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Law
In summary, the quantum world is a strange and complex place that is difficult to explain. Some theories suggest that extra dimensions are necessary for understanding it, and these dimensions may be all around us. Physicists do not use these dimensions to explain quantum properties, but rather take them as a basic fact. The goal of string physicists is to create predictions of ordinary particle behavior from these extra dimensions, but this is still a work in progress. While it may seem crazy to think about the quantum world in this way, it is still a valid perspective to consider.
  • #1
yquantum
1
0
Dear Sir
It would be a understatement even to try and explain how strange the quantum world is.
But is it not possible that we are by our own mass held within a four dimension space and that is why (c) can only go 300,000 klm per/sec because of relativity mass and why electorn can not crash in on the necleus, we quote, Pauli, Heisenberg, Bohr, Einstein, but the true be know we can not get out of the BOX. Higher dimension is not something above us but it is all all around us. Electrons and Proton and even Photons they exist in many dimensions and that could explain one case in point duality and the atom make up, could you please let me know if crazy would be my trouble, or if by chance the Quantum World will not be explain in our life time.
yquantum
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF and the MKaku forum, yquantum,

You are basically correct about the dimensions. If we accept string physics, it HAS to have the extra dimensions to work at all. And yes they contact us at every point of our space.

Physicists do not use the extra dimensions to explain quantum properties like uncertainty; it seems better to take it as something nature gives us, a basic fact on which we build all our theories, including strings.

Wave-particle duality may eventually be explained by a theory derived from strings that replaces both particles and waves with the behavior of more basic things, such as strings or their multidimensional siblings, branes. It is hoped by string physicists that they can create predictions of ordinary particle behavior, like electrons and photons, out of "stringy" precursors. This is still a work in progress.

It is not at all crazy to think along the lines you have, but physicists have found it more productive to think along the lines I have described.
 

1. What is conservation law?

Conservation law is a fundamental principle in science that states that the total amount of a quantity remains constant over time, unless it is affected by an external force.

2. What is correspondence law?

Correspondence law is a principle in physics that describes the relationship between classical mechanics and quantum mechanics. It states that as the scale of a system increases, the laws of classical mechanics become more accurate and the laws of quantum mechanics still hold true.

3. How are conservation and correspondence law related?

Conservation and correspondence law are related because they both describe fundamental principles in physics. Conservation law states that a quantity remains constant over time, while correspondence law relates classical mechanics to quantum mechanics.

4. Why are conservation and correspondence law important?

Conservation and correspondence law are important because they provide a foundation for understanding the behavior of physical systems and making accurate predictions. They are also crucial for developing new theories and models in physics.

5. Can conservation and correspondence law be violated?

In general, conservation and correspondence law are considered to be fundamental and unbreakable principles. However, there are some situations, such as in extreme conditions like black holes, where they may appear to be violated. These situations are still being studied and understood by scientists.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
18
Views
575
  • Classical Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
898
Back
Top