Proof versus speculations

  • Thread starter Nigel
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof
In summary, there is a difference between mathematical proofs and Popperian speculations in science. Popperian speculations require political backing and are often suppressed unless they come from the right sources. On the other hand, the Archimedes approach uses experimental facts and mathematical logic to prove results, allowing for constructive criticism. This approach has been used in the mechanism of gravity, which predicts testable constants and offers both an Archimedes-style proof and Popperian predictions. It is unclear how this approach improves upon relativity.
  • #1
Nigel
170
0
There is a major difference in approach between mathematical proofs and Popperian speculations in science. Popperian speculations are the opposite of Archimedes’ proofs: you speculate and then experiments are done to check it. This is political stuff, because nobody can speculate unless they have political backing from an editor: speculation is suppressed, dismissed and rejected unless it comes from the right quarters.

So science is dead in that case. The alternative is Archimedes’ approach: you use experimental facts plus mathematical logic to prove, step by step, your results. You allow anyone to point out an error or a misinterpretation in any step. This is what Ivor Catt and myself have done for the mechanism of gravity, taking account of constructive criticisms and suggestions along the way, and it also predicts testable constants like the universal gravitational constant. So this is both an Archimedes’ style proof and offers Popperian predictions. (gravity proof: http://members.lycos.co.uk/nigelbryancook/)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
having read your site, where does this improve on relativity?

Oracle
 

1. What is the difference between proof and speculations?

Proof refers to evidence or facts that support a claim or statement, while speculations are ideas or theories that have not been proven or tested.

2. Why is proof important in science?

Proof is important in science because it provides a solid foundation for understanding and explaining the natural world. Without proof, ideas and theories remain unverified and may not accurately reflect reality.

3. Can speculations ever become proof?

Yes, speculations can become proof through the scientific method. This involves formulating a hypothesis, conducting experiments and collecting data, and analyzing the results to support or disprove the initial speculation.

4. Is it possible for proof to change over time?

Yes, proof can change over time as new evidence is discovered or new technologies and methods are developed. This is why science is an ever-evolving field, as our understanding of the world around us continues to expand.

5. How can we distinguish between proof and speculations?

Distinguishing between proof and speculations can often be done by examining the evidence and methodology used to support a claim. Proof will have solid, repeatable evidence and a rigorous scientific process behind it, while speculations may lack this level of support.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
9K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
822
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
14
Replies
463
Views
62K
Back
Top