Plug Flow Reactor Vol: Comparing CSTR & PFR Kinetics, 95% Efficiency

In summary: This is due to the higher detention time required for the PFR, resulting in a longer reaction time and therefore a larger volume needed for the reaction to occur. In summary, for a substance decaying according to first-order kinetics with a rate constant of 0.07 1/day and a flow rate of 295 m^3/day, the volume required for a PFR to remove 95% of the substance is 6538 m^3, while the volume required for a CSTR is 5145 m^3.
  • #1
candycooke
14
0
What volume of a plug flow reactor is required to remove 95% of a substance that decays according to first-order kinetics with a rate constant of 0.07 1/day. The flow rate is 295 m^3/day. Compare the detention time and volume required for a PFR to that obtained for a CSTR with the same flow rate and kinetics.

efficiency = 95%
k = 0.07 1/day
Q = 295 m^3/day

r = -kC
C = 0.05 * C (initial)

I am unsure how to set up the equation necessary to solve this problem. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For the PFR, the detention time required is given by:t = V/Q where V is the volume of the reactor and Q is the flow rate. Substituting in the values given, we have:t = V/295 m^3/daySolving for V, we get:V = 295 m^3/day * tThe required volume is then obtained by solving for t such that the efficiency is 95%. From the equation for the first-order reaction rate, we have:C/C0 = e^(-kt)Solving for t, we get:t = ln(0.05)/(-k)Substituting this into the equation for V above, we get:V = 295 m^3/day * ln(0.05)/(-k)Substituting the value of k given in the problem, we get:V = 295 m^3/day * ln(0.05)/(0.07 1/day)V ~= 6538 m^3The volume required for a CSTR with the same flow rate and kinetics is:V = Q/(k*ln(0.05))Substituting in the values given, we get:V = 295 m^3/day / (0.07 1/day * ln(0.05))V ~= 5145 m^3Thus, the volume required for a PFR to achieve 95% efficiency is 6538 m^3, which is significantly larger than the 5145 m^3 required for a CSTR.
 

Related to Plug Flow Reactor Vol: Comparing CSTR & PFR Kinetics, 95% Efficiency

1. What is a Plug Flow Reactor (PFR)?

A PFR is a type of chemical reactor where reactants are continuously fed into a tubular system and undergo a series of reactions as they flow through the reactor. The reaction kinetics in a PFR are typically modeled as occurring in a highly efficient, well-mixed environment.

2. How does a PFR compare to a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR)?

In a CSTR, reactants are continuously fed into a well-mixed tank, where the reaction occurs. The main difference between a PFR and a CSTR is the degree of mixing and efficiency. While a PFR is modeled as having perfect mixing and high efficiency, a CSTR is more realistic and accounts for some degree of inefficiency due to imperfect mixing.

3. What is the significance of 95% efficiency in relation to PFR kinetics?

The 95% efficiency refers to the assumption that 95% of the reactants have undergone the desired reaction by the time they exit the PFR. This assumption simplifies the mathematical modeling of PFR kinetics and allows for easier comparison to other types of reactors.

4. How is the efficiency of a PFR affected by operating conditions?

The efficiency of a PFR is affected by several factors, including the concentration of reactants, temperature, and residence time (the amount of time the reactants spend in the reactor). Generally, higher concentrations and temperatures lead to higher efficiencies, while longer residence times can decrease efficiency.

5. What are the advantages of using a PFR over other types of reactors?

PFRs offer several advantages over other types of reactors, including a high degree of efficiency, better control over reaction conditions, and the ability to handle a wide range of flow rates. Additionally, PFRs are relatively simple to design and operate, making them a popular choice for many industrial processes.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
10
Views
36K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
7K
Back
Top