Confusing Kinematics and Acceleration

In summary, the conversation discusses a problem where a person on a planet with unknown gravitational acceleration drops a rock from a cliff and throws it up 2 meters above the cliff. The person has a very accurate watch as the only measuring instrument available. The first case involves the rock falling from the top of the cliff to the ground, while the second case involves the rock being thrown up and then falling back down. The equations used to solve the problem involve the initial velocity, initial position, and time of travel, but some of this information is not given. Therefore, the problem cannot be solved without additional information.
  • #1
Teog
Hello everyone. I've been at this for an hour now, so I think it's about time I asked for help.

We have a person on the surface of a planet with an unknown gravitational acceleration. The only measuring instrument available is a very accurate watch.

The person is on top of a cliff, and drops a rock from the top of it. It takes 4.15s for the rock to fall from the top of the cliff to the ground below. It travels X meters in total.

Afterwards, the person takes the rock, and throws it so that it travels up 2 meters above the top of the cliff, then it falls down to the ground. It travels (4 + X) meters in total Here is a simple depiction:
Case 1)
||
||
||
\/

Case 2:
//\\
|| ||
|| ||
|| ||
||
||
||
\/

This shouldn't be that hard, but I'm still not getting it. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
OK
In the first case, when the person drops the rock, the distance from the cliff to the bottom is:
d=a*(((4.15)^2)/2)
In the second case, when the person launchs the rock upwards, we can put:
2+d=(a*(t^2))/2------>d=a*(t^2)/2-2
Equalling the 2 d, you eliminate a and get t, that is the time that the rock lapses in the second launch from the upper part of its trajectory to reach the ground
The solution of the rest of the problem is straightforward
 
  • #3
Sorry, but i really don't understand your response. I understand that for the first part, where the rock drops, we can use 0.5(a)(t^2), but for the second part, you used the same equation displayed in a different form (with +2m on one side and -2m on the other). I'm really at a loss on this question.
 
  • #4
The general equation you need is

s = .5at2 + v0t+x0

Where v0 is the initial velocity and
x0 is the initial position.
s is the position of the rock at t seconds.

Now we need to identify the parameters. For the first part the rock is dropped so its initial velocity is 0 (v0=0) and the initial postion = X (x0=X)
we need the time when s=0
So set up the first equation using these parameters.

0= .5at2+X

so solve for a

a = -2X/t2

Now the second part cam be set up several different ways.
Since the rock is thrown up it is given some initial velocity v0, which we are not given, we only have the distance traveled.

we have.
2=.5aT2+ v0T
where T would be the time required to reach the top of motion of the rock, we do not have T, nor v0 so this does not help us.

We could write
0 = .5aΤ2+v0Τ + X

Where Τ is the time required to reach the ground after being thrown up. Again we do not have Τ or v0. Once again we are stuck.
Or We could write

0= .5aτ2+X+2,
this equation results from the fact that the rock has zero velocity 2m above the edge of the cliff and falls to the ground. Here we would need τ, the time for the rock to fall from its peak of travel to the foot of the cliff, once again we do not have this information.

We have only information on how far the rock travels, we do not have an initial velocity, or a time of travel. Without these bits of information the problem cannot be solved.
Did you simply forget to include a time for part 2 or was it not given?
 

1. What is the difference between kinematics and acceleration?

Kinematics is the branch of physics that deals with the study of motion without considering the forces that cause the motion. On the other hand, acceleration is a physical quantity that measures the rate of change of velocity. In simpler terms, kinematics describes the motion of an object while acceleration describes how fast the object's motion is changing.

2. Can an object have acceleration but no velocity?

Yes, an object can have acceleration without having a velocity. This can happen when the object is changing its direction of motion, but not its speed. For example, a car moving around a circular track at a constant speed will have an acceleration towards the center of the circle, but its velocity will remain constant.

3. How is acceleration related to time and distance?

Acceleration is related to time and distance through the equation a = (vf - vi) / t, where a is acceleration, vf is final velocity, vi is initial velocity, and t is time. This equation is also known as the average acceleration formula. It shows that acceleration is directly proportional to the change in velocity and inversely proportional to the change in time.

4. What is the difference between average acceleration and instantaneous acceleration?

Average acceleration is the average rate of change of velocity over a given time interval. On the other hand, instantaneous acceleration is the acceleration at a specific moment in time. It is calculated by taking the limit of the average acceleration as the time interval approaches zero. In other words, instantaneous acceleration is the acceleration at a single point in time, while average acceleration is the overall change in acceleration over a period of time.

5. How does acceleration affect an object's motion?

Acceleration affects an object's motion by changing its velocity. If an object has a positive acceleration, it will speed up in the direction of its motion. If an object has a negative acceleration, it will slow down or decelerate in the direction opposite to its motion. Acceleration can also change the direction of an object's motion, as seen in circular motion where the object's velocity is constantly changing due to a changing acceleration.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
35
Views
604
Replies
12
Views
899
  • Mechanics
Replies
20
Views
911
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
988
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top