- #1
Blue Scallop
- 290
- 17
If it is true that the different QM interpretations all make the same experimental predictions, because they all use the same underlying math of QM. That's why they are called "interpretations" instead of "different theories" then it is a fool's errand to keep searching for interpretations to explain future new experimental data, when we can just focus on the math and work from there. But I need to know the following:
1. Are there hidden variables that can no longer be described by math? Why not?
2. As long as that something can affect the physical.. then it should be described by math, right? Is there a foolproof proof of this?
3. In the history of physics.. are there something where it can't be described solely by math? But then love, desire, poetry.. can this still be described by math? This is not a philosophical question but just looking for that foolproof axiom where everything can really be described by math. I don't like philosophy. I only like hard empirical data and theories and experimental evidences.
1. Are there hidden variables that can no longer be described by math? Why not?
2. As long as that something can affect the physical.. then it should be described by math, right? Is there a foolproof proof of this?
3. In the history of physics.. are there something where it can't be described solely by math? But then love, desire, poetry.. can this still be described by math? This is not a philosophical question but just looking for that foolproof axiom where everything can really be described by math. I don't like philosophy. I only like hard empirical data and theories and experimental evidences.