- #1
Krombacher
- 16
- 0
I read this article in the Technology Review published by MIT:
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/26270/?p1=A3
First let me say that this is a very interesting development. But unfortunately the article has a "dumbed down" analogy for the layman, which I wish I could understand a little better. Here's the quote:
""If the past detector was active at a quarter to 12:00, then the future detector must wait to become active at precisely a quarter past 12:00 in order to achieve entanglement," they say. For that reason, they call this process "teleportation in time"."
Of course, this analogy is ridiculous for all the obvious reasons (physics doesn't care what kind of clock we use, for starters). But I am hoping someone here can explain it in a way that is not ridiculous but still intuitive enough to grasp.
Thank you,
Krombacher
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/26270/?p1=A3
First let me say that this is a very interesting development. But unfortunately the article has a "dumbed down" analogy for the layman, which I wish I could understand a little better. Here's the quote:
""If the past detector was active at a quarter to 12:00, then the future detector must wait to become active at precisely a quarter past 12:00 in order to achieve entanglement," they say. For that reason, they call this process "teleportation in time"."
Of course, this analogy is ridiculous for all the obvious reasons (physics doesn't care what kind of clock we use, for starters). But I am hoping someone here can explain it in a way that is not ridiculous but still intuitive enough to grasp.
Thank you,
Krombacher