Most stable nuclei are magnetic

In summary, the elements with the highest binding energy per nucleon (the most stable nuclei) are magnetic, but this is just a coincidence. The other two ferromagnetic elements, gadolinium and dysprosium, also have high binding energy per nucleon. The Curie Temperatures of these elements also support the idea that this is merely a coincidence. The periodic table and shell model can explain this coincidence in terms of chemical structure. The nuclear structure of an even-even nucleus does not contribute significantly to the atom's magnetic dipole moment, while an odd nucleus does contribute but to a lesser extent.
  • #1
vickyc
4
0
Hi,
I'm in my last year of school and part of my A-Level is on nuclear physics. We've recently studied binding energy and I noticed that the elements with the highest binding energy per nucleon (the most stable nuclei) are magnetic - iron, cobalt and nickel. Are binding energy and magnetism linked, or is this just a coincidence?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's a coincidence. The other two ferromagnetic elements are gadolinium and dysporosium. Also, there are magnetic and non-magnetic steels, and of course the nuclei are exactly the same.
 
  • #3
Vanadium 50 said:
It's a coincidence. The other two ferromagnetic elements are gadolinium and dysporosium. Also, there are magnetic and non-magnetic steels, and of course the nuclei are exactly the same.

Now, the coincidence could have be given in a more precise form by looking at Curie Temperatures. Here in Kelvin:

Co 1388
Fe 1043
Ni 627
Gd 292
Dy 88
Li <1

From time to time, ferromagnetism of Pd or even Pt is reported by some research.

This periodic table clarifies the role of chemical structure
http://www.msm.cam.ac.uk/doitpoms/tlplib/ferromagnetic/images/FigureE.gif
http://www.msm.cam.ac.uk/doitpoms/tlplib/ferromagnetic/printall.php

Actually, the fact that there is a shell model also for nuclear stability could have some role justifying the coincidence, could it? The proton number where the lower nuclear shells close to stability is also the electron number where electron subshells allow for ferromagnetic magnetic dipoles. In this sense, it should be only a mathematical coincidence, with nuclear spin playing no role.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
I think arivero has it right.

Nuclear structure relates to the magnetic properties of the *nucleus*. Since the nucleus is smaller than the electron cloud by a factor of 105, we expect the nuclear contribution to the atom's magnetic dipole moment to be smaller by that factor.

In the case of an even-even nucleus, the dipole moment has to vanish by symmetry, because the angular momentum of the ground state is zero, so there is no preferred axis. So for instance 56Fe has zero nuclear magnetic dipole moment.
 
  • #5
Hi,
this information may be useful..
57Fe has nuclear magnetic dipole moment.
 
  • #6
Rajini said:
Hi,
this information may be useful..
57Fe has nuclear magnetic dipole moment.

Yes, any odd nucleus will have a dipole moment, but it will not contribute significantly to the magnetic properties of the material, for the reasons given in #4.
 

Related to Most stable nuclei are magnetic

1. What makes a nucleus magnetic?

A nucleus is considered magnetic when it has a net spin, which is caused by the presence of unpaired protons or neutrons. These unpaired particles create a magnetic dipole moment, giving the nucleus a magnetic field.

2. Why are some nuclei more stable than others?

The stability of a nucleus is determined by the balance of strong nuclear forces, which hold the nucleus together, and electromagnetic forces, which can cause the nucleus to break apart. Nuclei with a balanced number of protons and neutrons are more stable than those with an uneven ratio.

3. How does the stability of a nucleus affect its magnetic properties?

More stable nuclei tend to have stronger magnetic properties because they have a more balanced ratio of protons and neutrons, resulting in a stronger magnetic dipole moment. This makes them more resistant to external magnetic fields and less likely to lose their magnetic properties over time.

4. Can a nucleus lose its magnetic properties?

Yes, a nucleus can lose its magnetic properties over time through a process called nuclear decay. This happens when a nucleus emits particles or energy, causing its spin and magnetic field to change. However, the stability of a nucleus can also play a role in how long it maintains its magnetic properties.

5. How are the magnetic properties of nuclei used in scientific research?

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a commonly used technique in scientific research that relies on the magnetic properties of nuclei. It allows scientists to study the structure and composition of molecules by measuring the interactions between the nuclei and an external magnetic field. This has applications in fields such as chemistry, biochemistry, and medical imaging.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
804
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top