Momentum Planetary Motion Problem

In summary, the problem involves two spheres of mass m and radius r, released from rest in empty space with their centers separated by a distance R. The spheres collide due to gravitational attraction and the goal is to find the magnitude of the impulse just before they collide. Using energy conservation, the initial and final energies of the system can be calculated, resulting in an equation of mv^2=Gm^3(1/2r-1/R). This can be solved for mv to get the magnitude of the impulse. The textbook solution differs slightly due to a difference in the calculation of the final energy, but the approach is generally the same.
  • #1
Plutonium88
174
0

Homework Statement


Two spheres of mass m and radius r, are released from rest in empty space. The centers of the spheres are separated by a distance R. They end up colliding due to gravitation attraction. Find the magnitude of the impulse just before they collide.

Homework Equations



Eg= -Gmm/r
ek= 1/2mv^2
J=F*T
J=ΔP

The Attempt at a Solution



I first drew my problem out with two frames.

The first frame of the two masses separated by a distance R. The second frame, where they are just about to touch separated by a distance of 2r.

I calculated Change in momentum for both objects.

ΔP1=ΔP2

ΔP1=mV

i found that the change in momentum was reliant upon the final velocity..

Initially when i observe the energy of the two spheres, They are separated by a distance of R, and have no kinetic energy. So if i calculate the Initial energy total for 1 mass, (Which is the same as the other) i get.

Et1= Eg1
Et1= -G*(m^2)/R

In my second frame when i calculate total energy the two spheres are now separated by a distance of 2r. The spheres now have kinetic energy after having moved toward each other..

Et2= Eg2 + Ek2

Et2= -G*((m^2)/2r

Now when i look at this question, i was thinking that it is similar to an orbital question where you have to move an object on the surface to an orbital level and it will have a certain speed... The kinetic energy in a question like that is based on the difference of the First Gravitational Potential Energy Subtract The Second.

I came up with this relation using conservation of energy (i'm assuming no energy is lost cause they are in space and no external forces have acted upon the objects only the conservative force of gravity.)Et1=Et2
Eg1 = Eg2 + Ek2
Ek2= Eg1-Eg2
Ek2 = -G(m^2)/R - (-G(m^2)/2r)
Ek2= G(m^2)/2r - Gm^2/Rso 1/2mv^2 = G(m^2)/2r - Gm^2/R

this leaves me with

V = √(Gm(1/r - 2/R))

so J = ΔP
so J = mV
so J = m*√(Gm(1/r - 2/R))

so j = √(Gm^3(1/r - 2/R))

This is my dilemma... I found a textbook online which has this same question stated, with the answer to the question I'm solving... There answer is different than mine so I'm wondering if some one could point out to me what I'm doing wrong. There answer seems to have 1/2r where i have 1/r and 1/R where i have 2/R...

There answer is:

J = √(Gm^3(1/2r - 1/R))

http://books.google.ca/books?id=Kuh...r centers separated by the distance R&f=false

Question #48 P382 (SHOULD BE A DIRECT LINK)

Anyways i would really appreciate some help cause i can't seem to find where I'm going wrong, and I'm not exactly positive if the textbook answer is even correct, because it is just stated in the question itself... I don't even really have a solid "Answer" to check my answer with other than this one... ^.^
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The gravitational energy you calculated is the energy of the whole system, not the energy of a single object.

You have so many equations for something which can be done in a few lines...
Initial energy of the system: Ei=-Gm^2/R
Final energy of the system: Ef=-Gm^2/(2r) + 2*(1/2)mv^2

Energy conservation gives Ei = Ef or
##-\frac{Gm^2}{R}=-\frac{Gm^2}{2r}+mv^2##
=> ##m^2v^2=Gm^3\left(\frac{1}{2r}-\frac{1}{R}\right)##
=> ##mv=\sqrt{Gm^3\left(\frac{1}{2r}-\frac{1}{R}\right)}##
 
  • #3
mfb said:
The gravitational energy you calculated is the energy of the whole system, not the energy of a single object.

So taking Eg1 = -Gm^2/R is not taking the the energy of a single object? Cause i thought you did the same thing in the next line...? I don't understand can you explain what you mean please?

mfb said:
You have so many equations for something which can be done in a few lines...
Initial energy of the system: Ei=-Gm^2/R
Final energy of the system: Ef=-Gm^2/(2r) + 2*(1/2)mv^2

And here for the EFinal

You are taking -Gm^2/2r + (1/2mv^2 + 1/2mv^2) <=== this is where you get 2MV^2 I'm assuming(please explain)?
but again isn't this taking the energy of the whole system? So which energy am i taking, of the entire system or of a single object?

mfb said:
Energy conservation gives Ei = Ef or
##-\frac{Gm^2}{R}=-\frac{Gm^2}{2r}+mv^2##
=> ##m^2v^2=Gm^3\left(\frac{1}{2r}-\frac{1}{R}\right)##
=> ##mv=\sqrt{Gm^3\left(\frac{1}{2r}-\frac{1}{R}\right)}##

Thank you for your time and i would really appreciate a response <3.
 
  • #4
Plutonium88 said:
So taking Eg1 = -Gm^2/R is not taking the the energy of a single object? Cause i thought you did the same thing in the next line...? I don't understand can you explain what you mean please?
It is the energy you need to separate those objects to "infinite" distance. Once you moved one object to "infinite" distance, there is nothing to do for the other object. In that way, the gravitational potential energy of a single object is the same as the gravitational potential energy of the whole system.

You are taking -Gm^2/2r + (1/2mv^2 + 1/2mv^2) <=== this is where you get 2MV^2 I'm assuming(please explain)?
Due to symmetry, both masses have the same velocity, and 2*(1/2)=1. I don't get 2mv^2 anywhere.

but again isn't this taking the energy of the whole system?
Correct.
So which energy am i taking, of the entire system or of a single object?
It is easier to consider the whole system, otherwise you have to split the gravitational energy in two parts without a real physical meaning.
 
  • #5
mfb said:
It is the energy you need to separate those objects to "infinite" distance. Once you moved one object to "infinite" distance, there is nothing to do for the other object. In that way, the gravitational potential energy of a single object is the same as the gravitational potential energy of the whole system.


Due to symmetry, both masses have the same velocity, and 2*(1/2)=1. I don't get 2mv^2 anywhere.


Correct.
It is easier to consider the whole system, otherwise you have to split the gravitational energy in two parts without a real physical meaning.
Thank you sir for the explanations they are clear. I appreciate all the feedback and thank you for brightening the start of my day.
 

Related to Momentum Planetary Motion Problem

What is momentum in planetary motion?

Momentum in planetary motion is the measure of an object's mass and velocity. In other words, it is the amount of force an object has when it is moving.

How is momentum calculated in planetary motion?

Momentum in planetary motion is calculated by multiplying an object's mass by its velocity. This can be represented by the equation p = mv, where p is momentum, m is mass, and v is velocity.

What is the conservation of momentum in planetary motion?

The conservation of momentum in planetary motion states that the total momentum of a system of planets remains constant unless acted upon by an external force. This means that the momentum of one planet may change, but the total momentum of the system will remain the same.

How does momentum affect the orbit of a planet?

Momentum plays a crucial role in determining the orbit of a planet. The greater the momentum of a planet, the larger its orbit will be. This is because a larger momentum means there is a greater force acting on the planet, causing it to travel a greater distance in a given amount of time.

How does momentum impact the stability of a planetary system?

Momentum is essential for maintaining the stability of a planetary system. The conservation of momentum ensures that the orbits of planets remain stable over time. If there were no momentum, the planets would not have enough force to maintain their orbits and would eventually collide or fly off into space.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
855
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
707
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
10
Replies
335
Views
8K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
226
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
248
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
525
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
984
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
551
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
848
Back
Top