Millennium Tower, San Francisco, leaning more than predicted

  • Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Tower
In summary: Government Audit and Oversight Committee quizzed Jack Moehle, a professor of structural engineering at UC Berkeley, whom Millennium Partners and its engineer consultants hired to conduct an independent peer review of the building design while it was being entitled.“The interest was to do an internal review to ensure that the structural system selected was suitable,” Moehle told city lawmakers at Thursday’s hearing. “[So] that if there was a formal peer review for the city later that most questions would be dealt with already.”Moehle says he inspected the high-rise’s design from top to bottom—but no lower than the bottom. A geotechnical review—i.
  • #1
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
2023 Award
21,911
6,338
I just happened to stumble across this new video.

Millennium Tower is Sinking Faster Than Rate ‘Limit' Set by Fix Engineers - Yoiks!​



Interview with Rune Storesund, UC Berkeley Center for Catastrophic Risk Management

It apparently settled (1 inch) in three months what was predicted in one year. And earlier predictions had settling the core region, not to one side. According to a report, it's leaning 22 inches (from vertical), ostensibly at the top of the building!
 
  • Wow
Likes Ivan Seeking and berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Astronuc said:
I just happened to stumble across this new video.

Millennium Tower is Sinking Faster Than Rate ‘Limit' Set by Fix Engineers - Yoiks!​



Interview with Rune Storesund, UC Berkeley Center for Catastrophic Risk Management

It apparently settled (1 inch) in three months what was predicted in one year. And earlier predictions had settling the core region, not to one side. According to a report, it's leaning 22 inches (from vertical), ostensibly at the top of the building!

They had better sling some big ropes around it and the adjacent buildings so it doesn't fall over. :olduhh:
 
  • Haha
Likes Astronuc
  • #3
Ivan Seeking said:
They had better sling some big ropes around it and the adjacent buildings so it doesn't fall over.
If it topples, it'll take other buildings with it. Just image a M6 earthquake or stronger. If they get liquefaction in an earthquake - I wouldn't want to be nearby.
 
  • Wow
Likes Ivan Seeking
  • #4
Astronuc said:
If it topples, it'll take other buildings with it. Just image a M6 earthquake or stronger. If they get liquefaction in an earthquake - I wouldn't want to be nearby.
Indeed! That could be catastrophic.
 
  • #5
Ivan Seeking said:
Indeed! That could be catastrophic.
Rune Storesund, UC Berkeley Center for Catastrophic Risk Management, so much said so. It seemed an understatement.

Back in 2017
https://sf.curbed.com/2017/2/3/14500782/millennium-tower-peer-revie
The developers behind the sinking Millennium Tower paid for an independent review of the tower itself before it was built, but not of the site it sits on, according to new testimony at City Hall on Thursday.

The Government Audit and Oversight Committee quizzed Jack Moehle, a professor of structural engineering at UC Berkeley, whom Millennium Partners and its engineer consultants hired to conduct an independent peer review of the building design while it was being entitled.

“The interest was to do an internal review to ensure that the structural system selected was suitable,” Moehle told city lawmakers at Thursday’s hearing. “[So] that if there was a formal peer review for the city later that most questions would be dealt with already.”

Moehle says he inspected the high-rise’s design from top to bottom—but no lower than the bottom. A geotechnical review—i.e., an assessment of the condition of the soil under the building site—wasn’t part of the process, because no one ever hired a geotechnical engineer.
This last part is fundamental to such projects. I don't know if they did or did not hire a geotechnical engineer. That requires different expertise than a structural engineer who looks at the building structure within the building envelop.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Wow
Likes Rive, russ_watters and Ivan Seeking

1. What caused the Millennium Tower in San Francisco to start leaning?

The Millennium Tower in San Francisco started leaning due to a combination of factors, including the soft soil it was built on, the use of a relatively lightweight foundation, and the lack of a deep enough foundation to support the height of the building.

2. How much has the Millennium Tower in San Francisco leaned so far?

The Millennium Tower in San Francisco has leaned approximately 18 inches at the top and 14 inches at the base since its completion in 2009.

3. Is the Millennium Tower in San Francisco in danger of collapsing?

While the Millennium Tower in San Francisco is not in immediate danger of collapsing, the continued leaning and structural issues have raised concerns about its long-term stability.

4. What is being done to address the leaning of the Millennium Tower in San Francisco?

The Millennium Tower in San Francisco is currently undergoing a retrofitting process to stabilize the building and prevent further leaning. This includes drilling new foundation piles and installing hydraulic jacks to help level the building.

5. Will residents and businesses in the Millennium Tower in San Francisco have to evacuate?

As of now, residents and businesses in the Millennium Tower in San Francisco are not required to evacuate. However, some residents have chosen to move out due to safety concerns and legal battles continue over who is responsible for fixing the leaning issue.

Back
Top