Michio Kaku's teleportation device

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of a teleportation device, which is currently only science fiction. The device would use similar technology to MRI scanners to create high resolution, 3D models of the human anatomy. The resolution would be so high that each pixel in the scan would represent a single atom, which could be stored as binary code. However, it is questioned whether one byte of information would be enough to represent an entire atom, as there are many components within an atom such as protons, neutrons, electrons, quarks, and strings. The conversation also touches on the moral and ethical implications of such a device, as it could essentially clone an individual. However, it is noted that quantum mechanics allows for the precise
  • #1
Cody Richeson
60
2
So this guy proposed a teleportation device which might one day be feasible, using technology similar to MRI scanners. Since such scanners can create high resolution, 3D models of the human anatomy, Kaku figures that at some point in the future, the resolution would be so high that each pixel in the scan would represent a single atom, which the computer could store as binary code. Assuming we had the space to store the billions of terabytes that would be needed to represent an entire human, there's one thing that really bugs me: Can you really represent an individual atom as just one byte of information? What about the protons, neutrons, electrons? What about the quarks, and the strings within if they exist? I understand that this machine is purely science fiction right now, but I'd like to know if you can really represent an atom with such a small amount of information.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Can you really represent an individual atom as just one byte of information?
Maybe not, but that is just related to the electrons.

With a few exceptions, a nucleus in the human body is always in its ground state, and this just needs 1 bit of information (maybe even less with some compression). Maybe the orientation of the nuclear spin counts as 1 qubit.
 
  • #3
Are we talking quantum teleportation, or like star-trek teleportation?
 
  • #4
Drakkith said:
Are we talking quantum teleportation, or like star-trek teleportation?

to assemble a copy on the other side you not only need to know what type of atom but also its energy states, positions, all the gears turning inside, etc. plus which direction is it moving and where it is. Impossible.
 
  • #5
It is possible to teleport states of the electrons (source), the position and movement are not necessary in the teleportation process to get an identical atom at a different place.
If you want to teleport macroscopic objects, I doubt that the exact spatial wavefunction matters at all. The right molecules at the right place (up to ~.1nm) with reasonable kinetic energy (~1/40eV per degree of freedom aka room temperature) should give an object where you do not see any difference.
 
  • #6
you go first.
 
  • #7
A presumption is that because the information stored within a computer and then eventualy reproduced, what you actualy end up with is a copy.Imagine the moral and ethical repercusions if it were possible, what do you do with the orginal even if it did belong to the teleported.
 
  • #8
Buckleymanor said:
A presumption is that because the information stored within a computer and then eventualy reproduced, what you actualy end up with is a copy.Imagine the moral and ethical repercusions if it were possible, what do you do with the orginal even if it did belong to the teleported.
That was not exactly the question but you raised an interesting technical point: it's not a teleportation device but a cloning device.
 
  • #9
On the quantum-mechanical level, it is a pure teleportation - you ruin the quantum state of the initial system. On a macroscopic level, you can indeed clone objects if you can scan and assemble them atom by atom.
 
  • #10
mfb said:
On the quantum-mechanical level, it is a pure teleportation - you ruin the quantum state of the initial system. On a macroscopic level, you can indeed clone objects if you can scan and assemble them atom by atom.
[edit:] OK it can be a "teleportation" of quantum states, but not of atoms. And as you argued (I think), it may not be useful to fully "teleport" quantum states when cloning atoms.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
You cannot clone the quantum-mechanical state of atoms.

You can copy a macroscopic object similar to a copy of a lego construction: Build it molecule by molecule. However, the states of those molecules will be different, so the copy is not perfect.
This is similar to a copy of a lego design: You can get the same arrangement of blocks, but the individual blocks will be a bit different. Quantum mechanics allows you to actually teleport the precise state of the blocks - the remote version will be exactly like the original, but that original gets destroyed (you can re-build it with other blocks, however).
 
  • #12
mfb said:
You cannot clone the quantum-mechanical state of atoms.[..] Quantum mechanics allows you to actually teleport the precise state of the blocks - the remote version will be exactly like the original, but that original gets destroyed (you can re-build it with other blocks, however).
I did not suggest such an impossible thing. And while one can mess up ("destroy") the atom states with MRI, that surely won't (shouldn't!) kill the person at that place. Once more: the topic here appears to be not really about teleportation of states, but about cloning of atoms.
I don't think that one byte/atom will be enough though, already because of the necessary location information.
 
Last edited:

Related to Michio Kaku's teleportation device

1. How does Michio Kaku's teleportation device work?

The device uses a technology called quantum entanglement, where the quantum state of particles are linked or "entangled" with each other. By entangling two particles and then separating them, they remain connected and any change in one particle will affect the other. This allows information to be transmitted instantly, essentially teleporting an object from one location to another.

2. Is Michio Kaku's teleportation device safe to use?

At this time, the device is still in its early stages of development and has not been tested on humans. However, based on current knowledge and understanding of quantum entanglement, the process is believed to be safe for inanimate objects. Further research and testing would need to be done before it can be deemed safe for human teleportation.

3. Can Michio Kaku's teleportation device teleport living beings?

Currently, the device has only been tested on inanimate objects such as photons and atoms. There are many ethical and technical challenges that would need to be addressed before teleportation of living beings could be considered. It is not yet feasible with our current technology and understanding of quantum mechanics.

4. How far can Michio Kaku's teleportation device teleport an object?

Theoretically, the device has the potential to teleport an object anywhere in the universe as long as there is a receiver device at the destination. However, there are limitations to the current technology and it is not yet possible to teleport objects over long distances. Additionally, there may be unforeseen challenges related to teleportation over vast distances in terms of energy and accuracy.

5. When will Michio Kaku's teleportation device be available for public use?

At this time, the device is still in the early stages of development and has not been tested on a large scale. It is impossible to predict when it will be available for public use as it depends on many factors such as funding, research progress, and ethical considerations. It may take many years or even decades before the technology is advanced enough for public use.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
68
Views
15K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
0
Views
761
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
118
Views
10K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
17
Views
5K
Back
Top