- #1
- 8,142
- 1,755
Vote for the things that you think exist, are true, or can be done. Please consider all choices and/or options. Please select if any option applies. Multiple choices allowed.
Last edited:
Originally posted by Dal
I voted all of them because I have no proof that they don't exist.
We can prove something if it does exist.
We can also prove something if it doesn't exist right? We should.[?]
Originally posted by Dal
Hahaha...My logic crumbled. [b(]
Originally posted by russ_watters
To the surprise of many I'm sure, I answered yes to all but the second and third from the end (though I'm not exactly sure what "transdimensional" means).
Originally posted by FZ+
ET: Yes, but not of the little gray variety that pop round for a little social abducting.
Originally posted by Ivan Seeking
Really no. We could find that these things do exist, but we can never prove that they don't. A negative can never be proven. This is a fundamental truth of logic.
Originally posted by BiologyForums
No offense but for someone who constantly posts in this forum I wouldn't take to hear your comments on logic.
Especially since logic can most certainly disprove the existence of something. In fact the methods for disproving existence are a fundamental truth of logic.
So you're sorely mistaken. Where did you receive this "education" in logic?
Wow, ET leads God by one.
Originally posted by FZ+
Must resist making patronising statement.
Must resist making patronising statement.
Must resist making patronising statement...
To make everything clear to all, I do not believe in any deities, ghosts, angels, demons, devils, goblins, banshees, Hell or Heaven, Purgatory, saints, imps, sprites, fairies, gnomes, bunyips, or bogey men. In that short list I've missed a lot of other things of which I doubt the existence, as I'm sure you can see. Add on Life-After-Death, Sylvia Browne, and perpetual motion. (Yes, I believe Sylvia exists, but not as she represents herself.) Note that I state I do not have a belief in these things, and the reason is that the supporting evidence offered for them — if any — is very, very, bad.
Originally posted by SkinWalker
The poll is a bit ambiguous in my opinion. The Thread title starts with "What do you believe is possible," but the poll title is "what do you believe?"