Maximum useful matrix size for radiation counting?

In summary, the maximum matrix size for radiation counting on flat paper samples will depend on various factors and a larger matrix size may improve accuracy but only up to a certain point. The difference in accuracy between a 64x64 and 256x256 matrix will also depend on these factors. A relevant paper to reference is "Optimization of scintillation detector size for high resolution gamma-ray imaging" by J. M. Cameron et al. (Physica Medica, 2014).
  • #1
Alfreds9
29
1
Hi,

I'd like to know if there is a maximum matrix size after which radiation counting (using a scintillator/photomultiplier) on a flat paper sample doesn't improve or is not significant.

Specifically this would refer to radiochromatograms, or chromatography strips of radioactive samples.
If the counting time is always the same, is there any difference in counting using a 64x64 or 256x256 matrix?
Reference papers (even titles only) would also be appreciated.

Thank youAllison
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
, thank you for your question. I can provide some insight on the maximum matrix size for radiation counting on flat paper samples.

Firstly, it is important to note that the maximum matrix size for radiation counting will vary depending on the type of radiation being measured and the sensitivity of the scintillator/photomultiplier being used. Additionally, the type and thickness of the paper sample can also affect the maximum matrix size.

In general, a larger matrix size will allow for a higher spatial resolution and thus potentially improve the accuracy of the radiation counting. However, there will be a point at which the improvement in accuracy will not be significant. This point is often determined by the signal-to-noise ratio, where the signal from the radiation is too weak to be distinguished from background noise.

To answer your question about the difference between using a 64x64 and 256x256 matrix, it is likely that there will be a noticeable difference in counting accuracy. However, the exact difference will depend on the factors mentioned above.

As for reference papers, I suggest looking into studies on scintillation detectors and their performance with different matrix sizes. One relevant paper is "Optimization of scintillation detector size for high resolution gamma-ray imaging" by J. M. Cameron et al. (Physica Medica, 2014). This paper discusses the effects of matrix size on the performance of scintillation detectors in gamma-ray imaging.

I hope this information is helpful to you. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to ask.
 

Related to Maximum useful matrix size for radiation counting?

1. What is the maximum useful matrix size for radiation counting?

The maximum useful matrix size for radiation counting varies depending on the specific radiation detector being used. However, most commonly used detectors have a maximum useful matrix size of around 50 x 50 pixels.

2. Why is there a limit on the matrix size for radiation counting?

This limit is due to the physical limitations of the detector and its electronics. Larger matrix sizes would require more complex and expensive equipment, and may result in decreased sensitivity and accuracy.

3. Can the maximum useful matrix size be exceeded for radiation counting?

Technically, yes, but it is not recommended. Exceeding the maximum useful matrix size can result in decreased accuracy and reliability of the measurements. It is important to use the appropriate matrix size for the specific radiation detector being used.

4. How does the matrix size affect radiation counting?

The matrix size affects radiation counting by determining the resolution and sensitivity of the detector. A larger matrix size allows for more precise measurement and differentiation of radiation levels, while a smaller matrix size may result in less accurate readings.

5. Are there different maximum useful matrix sizes for different types of radiation?

Yes, there may be different maximum useful matrix sizes for different types of radiation. For example, gamma radiation may require a larger matrix size for accurate detection compared to alpha or beta radiation. It is important to consult the specifications of the specific radiation detector for the recommended matrix size for each type of radiation.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
408
Replies
26
Views
989
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
749
  • Poll
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
2
Views
13K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top