Many worlds interpretation incompatible with quantum gravity

In summary: the paper...the term "linear" in the paper refers to a postulated linear relationship between photon energy and the speed of light in some quantum gravity theories."
  • #1
Nickyv2423
46
3
On wikipedia, I found one of the objections to MWI.
"We cannot be sure that the universe is a quantum multiverse until we have a theory of everything and, in particular, a successful theory of quantum gravity.[73] If the final theory of everything is non-linear with respect to wavefunctions then many-worlds would be invalid
MWI response: All accepted quantum theories of fundamental physics are linear with respect to the wavefunction. While quantum gravity or string theory may be non-linear in this respect there is no evidence to indicate this at the moment.[17][18]"
So is this saying since quantum gravity and string theory are non-linear that many worlds cannot be true?
 
  • Like
Likes physika
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Nickyv2423 said:
is this saying since quantum gravity and string theory are non-linear that many worlds cannot be true?

No, it's saying that if quantum gravity and string theory turned out to be nonlinear, and if as nonlinear theories they were confirmed to be the correct fundamental theory, then MWI could not be true. But that's a big if.
 
  • Like
Likes physika
  • #3
PeterDonis said:
No, it's saying that if quantum gravity and string theory turned out to be nonlinear, and if as nonlinear theories they were confirmed to be the correct fundamental theory, then MWI could not be true. But that's a big if.
But isn't string theory already non-linear
 
  • #4
Nickyv2423 said:
isn't string theory already non-linear

I'm not sure it's "nonlinear with respect to the wave function"; or more precisely, I'm not sure that it has to be. And in any case, string theory is speculative at this point; there is no way to test it experimentally now or for the foreseeable future.
 
  • #5
PeterDonis said:
I'm not sure it's "nonlinear with respect to the wave function"; or more precisely, I'm not sure that it has to be. And in any case, string theory is speculative at this point; there is no way to test it experimentally now or for the foreseeable future.
Are there quantum gravity theories that are linear with respect to the wave function?
 
  • #6
Nickyv2423 said:
Are there quantum gravity theories that are linear with respect to the wave function?

AFAIK string theory can be; "string theory" doesn't really describe one theory, it describes a whole family of theories.

I don't know enough about other quantum gravity candidates to know where they stand on linearity with respect to the wave function, or if "wave function" is even a meaningful concept in them at the fundamental level (it doesn't seem to be in loop quantum gravity, for example). My general impression is that this is an open question at this point.
 
  • #7
Nickyv2423 said:
But isn't string theory already non-linear
String theory is linear with respect to the wave function. I have never heard that someone even considers the possibility that it might be non-linear.
 
  • Like
Likes physika
  • #8
Demystifier said:
String theory is linear with respect to the wave function. I have never heard that someone even considers the possibility that it might be non-linear.
So does that mean that string theory is compatible with the many worlds interpretation (which assumes wave function is physically real)?
 
  • #9
Nickyv2423 said:
So does that mean that string theory is compatible with the many worlds interpretation (which assumes wave function is physically real)?
Yes.
 
  • #11
physika said:
it seems that it is not linear (Quantum Gravity)

That's not what the paper is saying. The term "linear" in the paper refers to a postulated linear relationship between photon energy and the speed of light in some quantum gravity theories. That has nothing to do with whether the theory itself is linear or nonlinear.
 
  • #12
PeterDonis said:
That's not what the paper is saying. The term "linear" in the paper refers to a postulated linear relationship between photon energy and the speed of light in some quantum gravity theories. That has nothing to do with whether the theory itself is linear or nonlinear.

from bibliograpy of
http://www.openu.ac.il/personal_sites/yoni-granot/papers/GRB090510_Nature.pdf

Zloshchastiev, K. G. Logarithmic nonlinearity in theories of quantum gravity: origin of time and observational consequences.

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0202289310040067
https://arxiv.org/pdf/0906.4282v5.pdf

"Starting from a generic generally covariant classical theory we introduce the logarithmic correction to the quantum wave equation. We demonstrate the emergence of the evolution time from the group of automorphisms of the von Neumann algebra governed by this non-linear correction. It turns out that such time parametrization is essentially energy-dependent and becomes global only asymptotically - when the energies get very small comparing to the effective quantum gravity scale. Similar thing happens to the Lorentz invariance - in the resulting theory it becomes an asymptotic low-energy phenomenon. We show how the logarithmic non-linearity deforms the vacuum wave dispersion relations and explains certain features of the astrophysical data coming from recent observations of high-energy cosmic rays. In general, the estimates imply that ceteris paribus the particles with higher energy propagate slower than those with lower one, therefore, for a high-energy particle the mean free path, lifetime in a high-energy state and, therefore, travel distance from the source can be significantly larger than one would expect from the conventional theory"

"In the conventional quantum mechanics the linearity of the wave equation is something which is implicitly presupposed, yet the possibility of the non-linear generalization has not been ruled out by experiment"

"the modern theory of quantum gravity is believed to be essentially non-linear - because the propagating particle will cause the quantum fluctuations in gravitational medium which will react back.".
 
  • #13
physika said:
the modern theory of quantum gravity is believed to be essentially non-linear

"Is believed to be" is not the same as "has been experimentally demonstrated to be".
 
  • #14
The OP's question has been answered. Thread closed.
 

Related to Many worlds interpretation incompatible with quantum gravity

What is the Many Worlds Interpretation?

The Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI) is a theory in quantum mechanics that suggests the existence of multiple parallel universes, each with its own set of physical laws and properties. According to this interpretation, every possible outcome of a quantum measurement exists in a different universe, and our perception of a single reality is merely a result of our observation.

What is Quantum Gravity?

Quantum gravity is a theoretical framework that attempts to reconcile the principles of quantum mechanics, which govern the behavior of subatomic particles, with the principles of general relativity, which govern the behavior of large-scale objects. It is believed that at extremely small scales, such as the Planck length, the effects of gravity and quantum mechanics become intertwined, making it necessary to have a unified theory to explain both phenomena.

How is the Many Worlds Interpretation incompatible with Quantum Gravity?

The Many Worlds Interpretation is incompatible with Quantum Gravity because it suggests the existence of an infinite number of parallel universes, each with its own set of physical laws. This goes against the principles of quantum gravity, which aim to explain the fundamental laws of the universe in a unified manner. In addition, the MWI relies on the concept of wavefunction collapse, which is not accounted for in quantum gravity theories.

Can the Many Worlds Interpretation and Quantum Gravity be reconciled?

Currently, there is no widely accepted theory that reconciles the Many Worlds Interpretation and Quantum Gravity. Some attempts have been made, such as the Many Interacting Worlds Theory, which proposes that the parallel universes in the MWI can interact with each other through quantum entanglement. However, this theory is still speculative and has not been fully developed or accepted by the scientific community.

Why is the Many Worlds Interpretation still a popular theory despite its incompatibility with Quantum Gravity?

The Many Worlds Interpretation is still a popular theory because it provides a simple and elegant explanation for the strange phenomena observed in quantum mechanics. It also offers a way to resolve the paradoxes and inconsistencies that arise in other interpretations of quantum mechanics. Additionally, the MWI has not been definitively proven or disproven, making it a subject of ongoing debate and research in the scientific community.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
1
Views
440
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
18
Views
993
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
11
Views
765
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
2
Views
529
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
5
Replies
174
Views
9K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
11
Replies
376
Views
11K
Back
Top