Low impact energy, high impact toughness - comparisons

In summary: Your name]In summary, the conversation discusses the impact toughness of steel and specifically the results of a paper comparing the toughness of four different steels using the Charpy impact test. It is clarified that toughness and hardness are two different properties of a material and that SAE 4140 has the lowest impact energy but the highest fracture toughness due to its microstructure. The steel is considered to be more ductile than brittle, but all materials have a combination of both properties. The formula for calculating impact toughness from a Charpy energy test is also provided.
  • #1
raniero
42
0
Hi,

I have been doing some research about imapact toughness of steel and found a paper comparing toughnesses of 4 different steels using the Charpy impact test. The following is a link to the paper mentioned.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B363OnUPK7-deGJDdkhwVU9SQ2s/view?usp=sharing

At 24oC, SAE 4140 has the lowest impact energy, 13J.

In the conclusion it is stated that fracture toughness of SAE 4140 is the largest of all at 68.61 MPa m1/2.

How come the mentioned steel absorbed the least amount energy and ended up being the the toughest? Is it because it has a higher ultimate tensile strength?

Could it be considered as being a ductile or brittle material? The high toughness suggests it is ductile but is surely did not deform as much as the other steels.

Note: I am still unsure of how to calculate the impact toughness from a Charpy energy test although I understand how the energy to fracture the specimen is obtained.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2

Thank you for sharing your findings and questions about the impact toughness of steel. I would like to provide some insights and clarification on the topic.

Firstly, it is important to understand that toughness and hardness are two different properties of a material. Hardness refers to a material's resistance to indentation or penetration, while toughness refers to its ability to resist fracture or breaking. In the case of steel, the Charpy impact test is commonly used to measure toughness.

In the paper you have shared, the researchers have compared the toughness of four different steels using the Charpy impact test. The test measures the amount of energy required to fracture a notched specimen at a specific temperature. The lower the energy absorbed, the more brittle the material is considered to be.

Now, to answer your question about SAE 4140 having the lowest impact energy but the highest fracture toughness, it is important to consider the microstructure of the steel. SAE 4140 is a low alloy steel with a high carbon content, which makes it stronger and harder than the other steels in the comparison. This means that it requires more energy to deform and fracture the material. However, the microstructure of SAE 4140 also contains a significant amount of fine-grained ferrite, which makes it more ductile and able to absorb more energy before fracturing.

In terms of whether SAE 4140 can be considered a ductile or brittle material, it is important to note that all materials have a combination of ductile and brittle properties. In this case, the high toughness of SAE 4140 suggests that it is more ductile than brittle. However, it is still possible for it to exhibit some brittle behavior, especially under certain conditions such as low temperatures or high loading rates.

Regarding the calculation of impact toughness from a Charpy energy test, it can be calculated using the following formula: Toughness = (Energy absorbed by specimen / Cross-sectional area of specimen) x (1 / Length of notch). This calculation takes into account the size and shape of the specimen, as well as the amount of energy absorbed.

I hope this information helps clarify your questions about the impact toughness of steel. If you have any further inquiries, please do not hesitate to reach out. Best of luck with your research.
 

Related to Low impact energy, high impact toughness - comparisons

1. What is low impact energy and high impact toughness?

Low impact energy refers to the amount of energy required to break a material under impact. High impact toughness, on the other hand, refers to a material's ability to withstand sudden or repeated impact without breaking or fracturing.

2. How are low impact energy and high impact toughness measured?

Low impact energy is typically measured using a Charpy impact test, which involves striking a notched specimen with a pendulum and measuring the amount of energy absorbed by the material. High impact toughness is measured using a toughness test, such as the Izod or KIC test, which evaluates a material's resistance to crack propagation under impact.

3. Why are low impact energy and high impact toughness important properties?

These properties are important for materials used in applications that experience sudden or repeated impact, such as construction materials, automotive parts, and tools. Low impact energy and high impact toughness can prevent catastrophic failures and ensure the safety and reliability of these materials.

4. How do low impact energy and high impact toughness compare to each other?

Low impact energy and high impact toughness are inversely related. This means that as the impact energy required to break a material decreases, its impact toughness typically increases. However, materials can have a combination of both low impact energy and high impact toughness, depending on their microstructure and composition.

5. Can low impact energy and high impact toughness be improved?

Yes, these properties can be improved through various methods such as selecting materials with a fine-grained microstructure, using heat treatments to improve the material's toughness, and incorporating toughening agents such as fibers or particles. Additionally, the design and manufacturing process can also play a role in improving the low impact energy and high impact toughness of materials.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
13K
Back
Top