- #1
venkat
- 29
- 0
Bell thought that maybe non-local hidden variable theories might have something to say, even though local hidden variable theories have been shown to be unable to properly describe nature.
well, what exactly would you mean by a non local hidden variable theory?
where exactly does the assumption of locality come,in the proof of Bell's theorem? does it arise when we say that in a hidden variable theory( in the proof of Bell's theorem), even non-commuting variables have simultaneous reality?
well, what exactly would you mean by a non local hidden variable theory?
where exactly does the assumption of locality come,in the proof of Bell's theorem? does it arise when we say that in a hidden variable theory( in the proof of Bell's theorem), even non-commuting variables have simultaneous reality?