- #36
member 5645
Thanks to those who have answered, but I'd still like to know...
WHY is it that the state should have the right to remove freedoms, but not life?
This has been said in this thread, and I don't follow the logic that you should have this sort of removal,but not death...unless you don't believe that removal of freedom and rights is worse than death(then we simply disagree on values).
WHY is it that the state should have the right to remove freedoms, but not life?
This has been said in this thread, and I don't follow the logic that you should have this sort of removal,but not death...unless you don't believe that removal of freedom and rights is worse than death(then we simply disagree on values).