Laser vs Metal: Elimination of Matter in Blasting Holes

In summary, when a blaster or laser is used to make a hole in a piece of metal, the matter of the metal is not completely eliminated from the universe. This process is known as laser ablation and it is similar to boiling water in a pan - the water vapor doesn't disappear from the universe, it just changes form. The same applies to the metal vapors that are produced during laser ablation.
  • #1
motleycat
40
0
When blaster or laser is used to make a hole in a piece of metal is any of the matter of the metal completely eliminated from the universe?
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #3
motleycat said:
When blaster or laser is used to make a hole in a piece of metal is any of the matter of the metal completely eliminated from the universe?
No.
 
  • Like
Likes UncertaintyAjay
  • #4
nasu said:
No.
Great. Explanation?
 
  • #5
motleycat said:
Great. Explanation?
Where does the water in a pan go when you boil it dry? That's what happens to the metal - the difference is that just that some metal vapors burn but water vapor doesn't.
 
  • #6
motleycat said:
Great. Explanation?
What to explain? Do you know any process that will make something to "dissapear from this universe"? Whatever that means.
 
  • Like
Likes UncertaintyAjay

Related to Laser vs Metal: Elimination of Matter in Blasting Holes

1. What is the difference between using lasers and metal in blasting holes?

Lasers and metal both have their own unique properties and methods for eliminating matter in blasting holes. Lasers use focused light energy to vaporize the material, whereas metal uses a physical impact to break apart the material.

2. Which method is more efficient in eliminating matter in blasting holes?

The efficiency of each method depends on the specific circumstances and materials being blasted. In some cases, lasers may be more efficient as they can be more precise and have a higher rate of energy transfer. However, in other cases, metal may be more efficient as it can break apart harder materials.

3. Are there any safety concerns when using lasers or metal in blasting holes?

Both lasers and metal can pose safety risks if not used properly. Lasers can cause eye damage or skin burns if proper safety precautions are not taken. Metal can also cause injury if proper protective gear is not worn. It is important to follow safety protocols and receive proper training when using either method in blasting holes.

4. Which method is more cost-effective in the long run?

The cost-effectiveness of each method depends on factors such as the initial investment, maintenance costs, and the frequency of use. Generally, lasers may have a higher initial cost but may require less maintenance and have a longer lifespan. Metal may have a lower initial cost but may require more frequent replacement.

5. What are the limitations of using lasers or metal in blasting holes?

Lasers may have limitations when it comes to certain materials, such as highly reflective surfaces or materials that are difficult to vaporize. Metal may have limitations when it comes to precision and may not be suitable for smaller blasting holes. It is important to consider these limitations when choosing between the two methods.

Similar threads

  • Optics
Replies
3
Views
851
Replies
11
Views
476
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
994
  • Optics
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Optics
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
0
Views
414
Back
Top