Kinetic and Potential energy problem

In summary, the sled and rider, with a mass of 90 kg and a speed of 3 m/s at point A on a frictionless hill, move to a rough surface with a coefficient of friction of 0.6 at the bottom of the hill. Using the equations for kinetic energy and potential energy, the final velocity is calculated to be 8.23 m/s. Then, using the formula for deceleration due to friction, the distance traveled by the sled before stopping is found to be 5.77 m. It is noted that solving the problem symbolically may require less work.
  • #1
BrainMan
279
2

Homework Statement


A sled and its rider have a mass of 90 kg and a speed of 3 m/s at point A on the frictionless hill of Figure 5.25. At the bottom of the hill, the sled moves onto a rough surface with a coefficient of friction of .6. How far from the base of the hill will the sled move before stopping?


Homework Equations


KEf + PEf = KEi + PEi

V^2= Vo^2 - 2ax

KE= 1/2m(v^2)

PE= mgy

The Attempt at a Solution


What I attempted to do was to find the speed at the end of the ramp by using the formula
KEf + PEf = KEi + PEi
so
1/2(90)(9.8)((3)^2) + (90)(9.8)(3) = 1/2m(v^2)
v= 7.67

Then I used the velocity to find the total distance by using the formlula V^2= Vo^2 - 2ax
so
0 = 60.2176 - 2(54)(x)
// I got 54 by multiplying the coefficient of friction by the normal force//
when you solve for x you get .56 m. The real answer is 5.77 m
 

Attachments

  • photo1.jpg
    photo1.jpg
    39.8 KB · Views: 433
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Just use conservation of energy. It's way cleaner and easier. Find the total energy at the bottom of the hill just before the rider enters the rough surface, and use E0 - W = Ef = 0 (because the rider lost all potential energy in coming down the hill which was converted to kinetic energy, and then the rider and sled have -W done on them by the surface)
 
  • #3
How do I find the distance the rider traveled then?
 
  • #4
Work is ##\int_{0}^{d} F \cdot dx = \int_{0}^{d} F dx cos(\theta)##
Idk if you know how to do integrals or not, this is pretty simple. ##cos(\theta)## is a constant, and since friction acts opposite the velocity, theta is pi, and cosine theta is -1. F is a constant (##\mu N##) and ##\int_{0}^{d} dx = x|_{0}^{d} = d-0##

put it all together and work done by friction is ##\mu N d (-1) = -\mu N d##

Use that for W in conservation of energy, and solve for d.

Hope that helps. BTW what level physics/math are you in?
 
  • #5
I do not understand integrals or calculus only algebra
 
  • #6
that's ok, you know conservation of energy though right?
You know the kinetic energy at Point a, and you know the potential energy at point a. That means you know the total energy at point a. Since no work is done between a and just before the rider hits the rough patch, that means you know the total energy right before the rough patch, as energy is conserved.

I gave you the work formula for friction, so take the total energy just before the rough patch and plug it into the conservation of energy equation. Then take the formula for work that I gave you (which should have come up in class, I'm sure), and plug that in. Then set the whole thing equal to the total energy at the end.
*hint* What's the potential energy at the bottom of the hill, and what is the kinetic energy of the rider once he has stopped, which is what your looking for *un-hint*

As to the algebra, I figured as much, that's why I worked it out for you. =]
 
  • #7
Ooo also, I noticed one slight flaw in your conservation of energy equation just now!

The proper equation to use is this:

##E_{total_{i}} \pm \Delta W = E_{total_{f}}##

Need that work in there bro.
 
  • #8
BrainMan said:
v= 7.67
Seems a bit low. Check your calculation.
0 = 60.2176 - 2(54)(x)
The mass is 90kg. What is the weight?
 
  • #9
OK I figured out this problem in a different way. My formula for the conservation of energy is correct I looked it up. The reason I got the question wrong is one I calculated the final velocity wrong its actually 8.23 m/s two I didn't use the right formula for the deceleration due to friction. The way for calculating the acceleration due to friction when using a kinematic equation like I did is the use the formula a= -μg which is the acceleration equals the coefficient of friction times the force of gravity. I used it and found the correct answer.
 
  • #10
That works, but I wouldn't rely too heavily on that energy equation. Think about it, is the total energy of the rider and sled the same as it was at point a? Definitely not. That equation only works if there's no work, but in this case there is, so it doesn't work for the friction part. Its good for from point a to the bottom of the hill, but after that its useless.
 
  • #11
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
That works, but I wouldn't rely too heavily on that energy equation.
I think you're confusing energy conservation (always true) with work conservation. There was nothing wrong with the method in the OP, just the details.
 
  • #12
BrainMan said:
1. Homework Statement [/b]
A sled and its rider have a mass of 90 kg and a speed of 3 m/s at point A on the frictionless hill of Figure 5.25. At the bottom of the hill, the sled moves onto a rough surface with a coefficient of friction of .6. How far from the base of the hill will the sled move before stopping?


Homework Equations


KEf + PEf = KEi + PEi

V^2= Vo^2 - 2ax

KE= 1/2m(v^2)

PE= mgy

The Attempt at a Solution


What I attempted to do was to find the speed at the end of the ramp by using the formula
KEf + PEf = KEi + PEi

All good, but you need much less work if you solve the problem symbolically first.

BrainMan said:
so
1/2(90)(9.8)((3)^2) + (90)(9.8)(3) = 1/2m(v^2)
v= 7.67

write mgh+1/2 mvi2=1/2 mvf2.

You can multiply the equation by 2/m, and you get vf2=2gh+vi2=6*9.8+32=67.8, vf=8.23 m/s

BrainMan said:
Then I used the velocity to find the total distance by using the formlula V^2= Vo^2 - 2ax
so
0 = 60.2176 - 2(54)(x)
// I got 54 by multiplying the coefficient of friction by the normal force//
when you solve for x you get .56 m. The real answer is 5.77 m

"54" is not acceleration but force. To get acceleration, you divide the force of friction by the mass. Its magnitude is μg. Vo2is the same as vf2=67.8.

ehild
 

Related to Kinetic and Potential energy problem

1. What is the difference between kinetic and potential energy?

Kinetic energy is the energy an object possesses due to its motion, while potential energy is the energy an object possesses due to its position or state.

2. How is kinetic energy calculated?

Kinetic energy (KE) is calculated using the formula KE = 1/2 * mass * velocity^2. The mass is measured in kilograms (kg) and the velocity is measured in meters per second (m/s).

3. What factors affect the amount of kinetic energy an object has?

The amount of kinetic energy an object has is affected by its mass and velocity. Objects with greater mass or velocity will have more kinetic energy.

4. Can potential energy be converted into kinetic energy?

Yes, potential energy can be converted into kinetic energy. For example, when an object falls, its potential energy due to its height is converted into kinetic energy as it gains speed.

5. How is potential energy related to work?

Potential energy is related to work (W) through the equation W = mgh, where m is the mass of the object, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the height or distance the object is lifted. This equation shows that work done on an object can increase its potential energy.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
348
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
743
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
796
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
841
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
55
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
693
Back
Top