Jeans Mass and Central pressure

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of a vast air-filled space called Virga, as described in Karl Schroeder's Virga series. The topic of discussion is whether there is a physical limit to the size of Virga, with the most obvious limit being the Jeans Mass. The conversation delves into calculations and equations related to the pressure and density within Virga, and ultimately concludes that the maximum stable size of Virga is about 44,000 km. Additionally, the conversation touches on the idea of using gravitational pressure to counterbalance the air pressure in Virga, but notes that the amount of material required for this is immense.
  • #1
qraal
790
3
Hello Forumites

In Karl Schroeder's Virga series, the Virga he describes as a vast air-filled space in which various "steam-punk" societies exist. Electronics are artificially stopped from working inside Virga, to preserve a low-tech sample of humanity. In pondering such a construct I wondered just how big it could get before running into physical limits. The most obvious is the Jeans Mass - when the gravitational self-attraction overwhelms sound waves restoring pressure/density perturbations away from equilibrium. The Virial Theorem says an equilibrium system is on the verge of self-collapse when...

2 Kinetic Energy = Ω

...Ω being the gravitational binding energy, in the case of a uniform density ball that's

3/5.G.M2/R

and, by the ideal gas law, the 2.KE = 3.N.k.T, N being the total number of particles. Assuming a constant mix of particles through out, N = M/μ, where M is the total mass and μ is the mean molecular mass. So 2.KE = 3M.(kT/μ) and the mass is 4/3.π.R3.ρ, where ρ is the density.

According to the ideal gas law

P.V = N.k.T

and N = M/μ, and since ρ = M/V, we can derive P/ρ = k.T/μ

which means 2.KE = 3M.P/ρ

For the Virga if we take P and ρ to be their sea-level standards (101,325 Pa and 1.225 kg/m3), that means we can compute

R2 = 15/(4πG).P/ρ2

so Rmax ~ 34,750 km

Here's the thing. The central pressure of a uniform ball, from its gravity alone, is

3/(8π).G.M2/R4

which gives us the central pressure as 253,312 Pa for the figures we just derived. How can that be right? The ratio is 5/2. To compare...

Pc = 6/9.π.G.ρ2.R2 (gravitational central pressure of uniform sphere)

Pj = 4/15.π.G.ρ2.R2 (...call it the Jeans Pressure)

I would think the stable scenario would be when Pc = Pj, but I suspect I am missing something subtle. I have assumed the system is isothermal (i.e. the interior is being heated to match radiative losses from the surface.)

So can anyone explain it to me?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
I know that for something to be supported against gravitational collapse (in hydrostatic equilibrium), there has to be a pressure *gradient*, meaning that the pressure increases as you move from the outside to the centre. You have assumed an ideal gas, but you have also assumed a constant density. Problem: the equation of state for an ideal gas says that if T = const, then P ~ ρ, and hence constant ρ ==> constant P. But we just said that P cannot be constant in hydrostatic equilibrium. Conclusion: an isothermal ball of (ideal) gas in hydrostatic equilibrium cannot have a constant density throughout. Could this be the issue?
 
  • #3
cepheid said:
I know that for something to be supported against gravitational collapse (in hydrostatic equilibrium), there has to be a pressure *gradient*, meaning that the pressure increases as you move from the outside to the centre. You have assumed an ideal gas, but you have also assumed a constant density. Problem: the equation of state for an ideal gas says that if T = const, then P ~ ρ, and hence constant ρ ==> constant P. But we just said that P cannot be constant in hydrostatic equilibrium. Conclusion: an isothermal ball of (ideal) gas in hydrostatic equilibrium cannot have a constant density throughout. Could this be the issue?

I had wondered the same. I think the problem is that I assumed the Jeans Mass is stable - it's not. Numerical simulations (using SPH) of Jeans Mass gas blobs will collapse inexorably, as will slightly sub-Jeans Mass blobs, but at about ~60% Jeans Mass the blobs disperse. Thus I think the maximum stable size is probably when Pc = P(average), so that the speed of sound can dampen out any perturbations from equilibrium. That means M(max) is roughly at (2/5)(3/2) of Mj, but that's a conjecture, not a proof.
 
  • #4
What simulations show to collapse or not is not very relevant for the question. The idea is that the Jeans mass is indeed the border between stability and collapse.

Cepheid was right: a sphere of gas is not in hydrostatic equilibrium if the density is constant.
 
  • #5
Putting numbers to my conjecture, that means a Virga style air-enclosure is 44,000 km across, using a standard N2/O2 mix to breathe. That's quite immense - Karl Schroeder settles for just 5,000 km in the books. I had wondered about just how strong the structure had to be to avoid bursting and derived some figures on using gravitational pressure of the enclosure itself to counterbalance the air-pressure - it works, but the material required is immense. Yet assuming we could ramscoop the Sun and sift for metals (astrophysical metals) there's ~20 Jupiter masses, to make stuff, available.
 

Related to Jeans Mass and Central pressure

1. What is Jeans mass and how is it calculated?

Jeans mass is the minimum mass required for a cloud of gas or dust to collapse under its own gravity and form a star. It is calculated using the Jeans mass formula, which takes into account the temperature, density, and size of the cloud.

2. What is the significance of Jeans mass in star formation?

Jeans mass plays a crucial role in the process of star formation. If a cloud of gas or dust has a mass greater than the Jeans mass, it will continue to collapse under its own gravity, leading to the formation of a star. However, if the cloud has a mass less than the Jeans mass, it will not be able to overcome the outward pressure and will remain stable.

3. How does central pressure affect the formation of stars?

Central pressure is one of the factors that determines the Jeans mass of a cloud. A higher central pressure leads to a lower Jeans mass, making it easier for a star to form. On the other hand, a lower central pressure means a higher Jeans mass, making it more difficult for a star to form.

4. Is there a relationship between Jeans mass and central pressure?

Yes, there is a direct relationship between Jeans mass and central pressure. As the central pressure increases, the Jeans mass decreases, and vice versa.

5. How do scientists use Jeans mass and central pressure to study star formation?

Scientists use the Jeans mass and central pressure to analyze and predict the formation of stars in different regions of space. By studying the properties of gas clouds, such as their temperature, density, and central pressure, they can determine if the conditions are suitable for star formation and predict the types of stars that may form.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
887
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
959
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
937
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Back
Top