- #1
Adam
- 65
- 1
A simple question. Do you trust the word/publicity of the USA government?
studentx said:i accidentally voted no. So whatever the results are, theyre wrong
Good point. That is why I believed Saddam Hussein was speaking the truth when he said there were no WMD stockpiles while many people I discussed with claimed that his frequentlies in the past "proved" he was lying again.studentx said:Someone who often lies can still tell the truth. It seems many here forget this! You shouldn't be proud to disbelieve the truth even when its told by someone you don't like!
Simon666 said:Good point. That is why I believed Saddam Hussein was speaking the truth when he said there were no WMD stockpiles while many people I discussed with claimed that his frequentlies in the past "proved" he was lying again.
The past proved they were there until somewhere after 1991. The past doesn't prove they were still there after that. I have chosen to believe the account of Hussein Kamel.phatmonky said:The past proved they were there. The question then was "where did they go?" Since Blix and David Kaye both say that they have no idea and can not account for them
Or the needs of some special interest group. I often wonder who actually runs the government, politicians or lobbyist.kat said:I think several of you have totally hi-jacked his thread! Usually, it takes a least a couple of pages for that to happen!
Jeez, have some manners!
in regards to your initial poll, no I don't trust the U.S. Government. In fact, I wouldn't trust any government! Governments, like any "creature" have an inherent desire to propagate, and to fight for self survival...At times that may necessity putting aside the concerns of the people and putting to the forefront the needs of the government, creating a "conflict of interest"
I think most people know the truth when they see it though (or at least can give a decent probability) - my biggest problem with this issue is people who ignore obvious truth.BoulderHead said:The problem isn't disbelieving the truth but rather, identifying it.
What I see as the obstacle here is very simple; no guarantee exists that the truth will ever be revealed.Originally posted by russ_watters;
I think most people know the truth when they see it though (or at least can give a decent probability)
Over the years I came to understand that it wasn’t my problem, acknowledged same, and carried on. Considering this problem through the lens of your first statement leads us to conclude such people are but only a minority. There should be some measure of comfort to be derived from holding that view.- my biggest problem with this issue is people who ignore obvious truth.
US or other government, it makes little or no difference; never blindingly, always skeptical/suspicious. Government is run by human beings after all and not some benevolent entity. Human beings have their own desires and agendas, and while I may trust a government clerk to give me correct change, I have absolutely no reason to unquestioningly accept the word of another living soul at face value, especially a complete stranger I’ve never had over dinner.Originally posted by Adam;
A simple question. Do you trust the word/publicity of the USA government?
There are many reasons to trust the word of the USA government, including the fact that they are elected by the people to represent and serve the country. Additionally, the government is held accountable by checks and balances, as well as independent oversight agencies. They also have access to extensive resources and information that the public may not have, allowing them to make informed decisions.
Like any government, the USA government is made up of individuals who may have their own biases and agendas. However, there are systems in place to ensure transparency and honesty. For example, government officials are required to take oaths of office and can face consequences for lying under oath. Additionally, the media and other organizations often fact-check and hold the government accountable for their statements.
One way to determine the honesty of the USA government is to gather information from multiple sources. This can include news outlets, independent fact-checking organizations, and government documents. It is also important to critically analyze information and consider the motivations behind certain statements or actions.
There have been instances in the past where the USA government has been found to be dishonest, such as the CIA's involvement in the Watergate scandal and the false claims about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. However, it is important to note that these are exceptions and do not represent the entire government.
While it is possible for any government to manipulate or withhold information, the USA government is subject to laws and regulations that require transparency and protect the public's right to access information. There are also independent organizations, such as the Freedom of Information Act, that allow individuals to request government documents and ensure accountability.