Is This Really Mussolini with My Great Grandfather?

  • Thread starter Petronius
  • Start date
In summary, according to the conversation, the figure in the top row is supposedly a figure supported by a medic and the figure third from the left, bottom row might be the unit commander.
  • #1
Petronius
13
2
Hello,

I recently received a photograph from my father, that supposedly depicts my great grandfather in a machine gun unit with Mussolini. According to my father, my great grandfather would often tell tales about being a in a unit with Mussolini and that he was "a big mouth". My father later found this photograph when my grandparents died. Sadly we have no information on what unit my great grandfather served in.

My great grandfather is apparently the one highlighted in the middle row with Mussolini in the top row. I was wondering if this was indeed possible and if anyone might be able to identify this unit/regiment.
 

Attachments

  • thumbnail_italian007.jpg
    thumbnail_italian007.jpg
    77 KB · Views: 202
Science news on Phys.org
  • #3
Just asked my dad, it seems he asked the same question on that forum. Thanks for your response!
 
  • #4
As I briefly reviewed a biog of the man (and now need to complete it) in thenHistory Resources thread in this section of the forum, I felt obliged to spend several minutes research on this question!
At first sight it does not look very like - but we are mostly familiar with photos of a later time.
It seemed more plausible after I saw this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Benito_Mussolini_1917.jpg and several photos if you rummage into this https://pin.it/2G7UqM4
Anything at all by which you might date the photo might help.
The biog mentioned - but there are many others- gives him wounded (by an accident) on 27 Feb 1917, after which he was never again in the front line. But it was not clear when he was discharged from the Army, so he might just have been attached to a unit in a behind-the-lines role after recovery, on the other hand on 1Aug 1917 he left hospital on crutches.The war still had more than a year to run, but in 1918 he was publishing political articles. I cannot make out any rank badges on him. In Aug 1916 he was prompted caporale maggiore (and after wounding, sergeant). I am guessing that a corporal's stripes are on lower sleeve like the man in front row left. but you cannot see this area on the candidate.
Then the biog gives him as being in a Bersagliere (light infantry marksmen) regiment, while this is a machine gun regiment. Then again there was constant reorganisation and improvisation during the war.

You are more likely to encounter relevant knowledge on Quora, where there is an incredible amount of military-historical expertise.
 
  • Informative
Likes Klystron
  • #5
Does the photo contain enough information for facial recognition software, perhaps coupled with ageing software? A forensic work up of the entire photo could help identify the participants and time more precisely than isolating on a particular celebrity figure.

Apropos to @epenguin's post, the figure in question on the top row appears to be supported by a medic to his left, assuming the bit of visible armband identifies a medic; perhaps due to a recent wound. A soldier in 1917 recovering from a wound or gas attack might be temporarily assigned to an available unit; not necessarily their unit of record. The soldier does resemble the archived photo on Wikipedia using bare eyeball comparison.

One may also wish to identify the figure third from the left, bottom row, displaying a handgun. He might be the unit commander. The two figures top left look interesting; possibly alpine riflemen attached to a machine gun unit? Perhaps they appear different due to their uniforms and elevation in the window.
 
  • Like
Likes epenguin
  • #6
Klystron said:
Does the photo contain enough information for facial recognition software, perhaps coupled with ageing software? A forensic work up of the entire photo could help identify the participants and time more precisely than isolating on a particular celebrity figure.

Apropos to @epenguin's post, the figure in question on the top row appears to be supported by a medic to his left, assuming the bit of visible armband identifies a medic; perhaps due to a recent wound. A soldier in 1917 recovering from a wound or gas attack might be temporarily assigned to an available unit; not necessarily their unit of record. The soldier does resemble the archived photo on Wikipedia using bare eyeball comparison.

One may also wish to identify the figure third from the left, bottom row, displaying a handgun. He might be the unit commander. The two figures top left look interesting; possibly alpine riflemen attached to a machine gun unit? Perhaps they appear different due to their uniforms and elevation in the window.

Gosh, I failed to notice that. The attitude does seem supportive and one could think the armband is being shown deliberately and making the point of a wounded comrade to the honour of the individual and the unit. Put all this to a more specialised site and there is a chance of homing into a conclusion or probability one way or the other.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron
  • #7
epenguin said:
As I briefly reviewed a biog of the man (and now need to complete it) in thenHistory Resources thread in this section of the forum, I felt obliged to spend several minutes research on this question!
At first sight it does not look very like - but we are mostly familiar with photos of a later time.
It seemed more plausible after I saw this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Benito_Mussolini_1917.jpg and several photos if you rummage into this https://pin.it/2G7UqM4
Anything at all by which you might date the photo might help.
The biog mentioned - but there are many others- gives him wounded (by an accident) on 27 Feb 1917, after which he was never again in the front line. But it was not clear when he was discharged from the Army, so he might just have been attached to a unit in a behind-the-lines role after recovery, on the other hand on 1Aug 1917 he left hospital on crutches.The war still had more than a year to run, but in 1918 he was publishing political articles. I cannot make out any rank badges on him. In Aug 1916 he was prompted caporale maggiore (and after wounding, sergeant). I am guessing that a corporal's stripes are on lower sleeve like the man in front row left. but you cannot see this area on the candidate.
Then the biog gives him as being in a Bersagliere (light infantry marksmen) regiment, while this is a machine gun regiment. Then again there was constant reorganisation and improvisation during the war.

You are more likely to encounter relevant knowledge on Quora, where there is an incredible amount of military-historical expertise.
Thank you for the suggestion and the information! Quora is worth a shot. I was doubtful myself but started to slightly entertain that was him in the photos when i saw some younger images. The jaw line seems like it could be right although the image is quite dark and shady.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron
  • #8
Wow, thank you to everyone for really dissecting this. I'll try to do some research if facial recognition could be used on this image. I would love to know more about the unit. I already learned so much from my German/Canadian relatives who passed away but never got to really hear any stories from my Italian side.

The armband is interesting, I wonder if I can find a good example online to compare it to, even though image quality is an issue.

I also wondered about the standing figure with the pistol as that seemed to show a lot of bravado when his comrades are posing more conservatively. When my classes are done I was also hoping to look into researching Italian historical veterans directly, and thus maybe figure out a lot more about the photo.

Thanks again,
 
Last edited:
  • #9
My dad suggested to me that because their collars are black and the presence of daggers it might be an Arditi unit?
You can see a dagger in the hand of the man with the arm band. I realized my phone can take much higher quality images than my scanner so I uploaded the shots here. I'm sorry I did not think to do this earlier.

After quick research I don't see the steel helmets that are sometimes associated with such troops though.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0060.jpg
    IMG_0060.jpg
    142 KB · Views: 161
  • IMG_0061.jpg
    IMG_0061.jpg
    131.9 KB · Views: 160
  • IMG_0062.jpg
    IMG_0062.jpg
    117.5 KB · Views: 157
Last edited:

Related to Is This Really Mussolini with My Great Grandfather?

1. Who is Mussolini and why is he relevant to my great grandfather?

Mussolini was a notorious Italian political leader who rose to power in the early 20th century. He is known for his fascist ideology and his alliance with Nazi Germany during World War II. Your great grandfather may have had some interaction or connection with Mussolini during this time period.

2. How can I confirm if the person in the photo is actually Mussolini?

There are a few ways to confirm the identity of a person in a photo. You can compare the photo with other known images of Mussolini, look for distinguishing features or clothing, or consult with a historian or expert on Mussolini's appearance.

3. What significance does this photo hold in relation to history?

This photo could hold significant historical value if it is indeed Mussolini with your great grandfather. It could provide insight into their relationship and any potential impact Mussolini had on your family's history. It could also serve as a rare and valuable artifact from a significant time in history.

4. How can I find out more information about this photo?

You can start by researching your family history and any potential connections to Mussolini. You can also consult with historians or experts on Mussolini and his reign to gain more context and information about the photo. Additionally, you can try to track down the original source of the photo and see if there are any accompanying details or records.

5. Is it possible that this photo has been doctored or manipulated?

Yes, it is always a possibility that a photo has been altered or manipulated. This is why it is important to do thorough research and consult with experts to confirm the authenticity of the photo. You can also analyze the photo for any signs of manipulation or consult with a photo forensics expert for further confirmation.

Similar threads

  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
78
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
65
Views
8K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top