Is there anything smaller than quarks?

In summary: They would have a mass that is very different from anything we know and they would have a magnetic moment that is completely different from anything we've ever seen.
  • #1
Sen Turner
2
1
Do we actually know for sure that quarks and leptons are as small as it gets, the complete fundamental particles? If so, how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You can never know something fundamental "for sure". You can make a model and test it to the best of your abilities.
 
  • #3
No. But we have very good indications that they are probably elementary.

(a) The energy scale. Particle accelerators can produce and study particles if their energy is sufficient. We could produce electrons and positrons as soon as the accelerators reached a few MeV (center of mass energy), we could study nuclear reactions at 10 MeV and more, we started seeing the substructure of protons at a few hundred MeV, the energy scale of the strong interaction and roughly the proton mass. Now we have 13 million MeV, and no substructure of quarks has been visible yet. If quarks are composite particles, what is the mass of their components? If they are light, we should have produced them by now. If they are heavy, how do they combine to a quark that is very light (few MeV)?
It is not impossible to write down a theory of composite quarks that is consistent with their non-observation so far, but it is very challenging and it needs very obscure assumptions. For leptons the problem is similar.

(b) Precision experiments. The most notable one is the g-factor, the ratio of the magnetic moment from spin compared to the magnetic moment from the particle motion (simplified description): For an elementary electron, the predicted value is 2.002 319 304 362 (where the last digit is uncertain). For a composite particle, the value can be everything, it can even be negative. The experimental result? 2.002 319 304 361 (where the last digit is certain). Experiment and predictions for an elementary particle agree with a precision of one part in a trillion. There is no reason why a composite particle should have a value that is even remotely similar.
Precision tests with quarks are challenging as they don't exist as isolated particles or decay too fast for better measurements, but so far everything agrees with the expectations for elementary particles as well.

While we can never be sure, composite leptons or quarks would be very odd.
 
  • Like
Likes stoomart, Imager and nikkkom

Related to Is there anything smaller than quarks?

1. What is the smallest known particle?

The smallest known particle is the quark, which is a fundamental building block of matter.

2. Is there anything smaller than a quark?

Currently, there is no evidence for anything smaller than a quark. However, some theories suggest the existence of even smaller particles, such as preons or strings, but they have not been proven yet.

3. How do we know that quarks are the smallest particles?

Scientists have conducted numerous experiments using high-energy particle accelerators to study the structure of matter. These experiments have consistently shown that quarks are the smallest known particles.

4. Can we ever observe something smaller than a quark?

It is currently impossible to directly observe anything smaller than a quark due to the limitations of our technology. However, as technology advances, it is possible that we may one day be able to observe even smaller particles.

5. Are there any practical applications for studying particles smaller than quarks?

Studying particles smaller than quarks is crucial for understanding the fundamental structure of matter and the universe. This knowledge can lead to advancements in technology and further our understanding of the natural world.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
19
Views
748
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
851
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top