Is there any groups working on FF's like CTEQ on PDF's?

  • Thread starter ccnu
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Groups
In summary, the conversation discusses various groups working on the parameterization of fragmentation functions and the availability of codes related to this topic. Peterson and Matteo Cacciari are mentioned as well as other software tools. The conversation also touches on the finalization of parameterizations by PDF groups and the specific aspects of fragmentation functions that are of interest.
  • #1
ccnu
13
0
I know some groups on PDF's like CTEQ, MSTW, NNPDF...
Is there any groups working on the parameterization of fragmentation functions, and publish any codes that can be called?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Peterson is the old standy. Matteo Cacciari has done work on more modern ones.
 
  • #3
Vanadium 50 said:
Peterson is the old standy. Matteo Cacciari has done work on more modern ones.
Oh, thanks!
I searched "Matteo Cacciari" in inspire, and found "FastJet user manual".
I know other softwares like Pythia, Herwig..., but they are event simulation tools.
Are there any parameterization forms or any code packages about FF's like CTEQ does in PDF's case?
 
  • #4
By ff do you mean flux?

I'm pretty sure the different PDF groups finalised the paramterisations quite a while ago. What is it you particularly care about? Number of eigen vectors or ?
 
  • #5
RGevo said:
By ff do you mean flux?

ff = fragmentation functions
 

Related to Is there any groups working on FF's like CTEQ on PDF's?

1. What is CTEQ and PDF in the context of FF's?

CTEQ (Coordinated Theoretical-Experimental Project on QCD Phenomenology) is a global collaboration of scientists that work on the development and improvement of Parton Distribution Functions (PDFs) for use in high-energy particle physics experiments. PDFs are mathematical functions that describe the probability of finding a quark or gluon with a certain momentum inside a proton or other hadron.

2. Are there any other groups besides CTEQ working on PDFs for FF's?

Yes, there are several other groups that work on PDFs for FF's such as NNPDF (NNPDF Collaboration), MMHT (The MMHT Collaboration), and HERAPDF (HERA PDF Working Group). Each group has its own approach and methodology for determining PDFs, and they often collaborate and share their results with each other.

3. How do these groups determine the PDFs for FF's?

These groups use a combination of experimental data and theoretical calculations to determine the PDFs for FF's. The experimental data comes from various particle colliders and other high-energy experiments, while the theoretical calculations are based on Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), the theory that describes the interactions of quarks and gluons.

4. Why is it important for these groups to work on PDFs for FF's?

PDFs for FF's are crucial for understanding and making predictions about high-energy particle collisions. They are also used in the analysis of data from particle colliders, which can provide insights into the fundamental nature of matter and the universe. Additionally, PDFs for FF's are important for improving our understanding of QCD and its role in the Standard Model of particle physics.

5. How often do these groups update their PDFs for FF's?

These groups update their PDFs for FF's regularly, typically once a year or every few years. This is necessary because new experimental data becomes available, and improvements in theoretical calculations are made. These updates ensure that the PDFs are as accurate as possible and can provide the most precise predictions for high-energy particle collisions.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
0
Views
683
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
404
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
10
Views
589
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
718
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
Back
Top