Is There a Place for Semi-Crackpot Physics Theories in Reputable Journals?

  • Thread starter rigetFrog
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Journal
In summary, a "Journal for semi-crackpots" is a scientific journal that publishes articles on unconventional or controversial theories and ideas. Anyone can submit their work, but it goes through a rigorous peer-review process. The reliability of articles can vary, and mainstream scientists may not consider it a credible source. However, as long as proper protocols are followed, it can be considered a legitimate platform for scientific discourse.
  • #1
rigetFrog
112
4
I'm looking for a journal that will publish semi-crack pot physics theories.
Not talking Josephson crackpot level.
Something that will consider Ab-initio approaches on ambitious problems where the big hitters of the field are focused using another technique.

Something reputable but it doesn't need a large audience.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The same journals that publish crackpot theories will publish "semi-crackpot" theories. There are no reputable journals that publish "semi-crackpot" theories. Crackpottery is crackpottery.
 

Related to Is There a Place for Semi-Crackpot Physics Theories in Reputable Journals?

1. What is a "Journal for semi-crackpots"?

A "Journal for semi-crackpots" is a scientific journal that publishes articles and research papers on unconventional or controversial theories and ideas that may not have enough evidence to be accepted by mainstream science. It is a platform for semi-crackpot scientists to share their ideas and findings with the scientific community.

2. Who can submit to a "Journal for semi-crackpots"?

Anyone can submit their work to a "Journal for semi-crackpots". However, the submission will go through a rigorous peer-review process to ensure that the research is valid and meets the journal's standards.

3. Are the articles published in a "Journal for semi-crackpots" reliable?

The reliability of articles published in a "Journal for semi-crackpots" can vary. While some articles may present valid and well-supported arguments, others may be based on unfounded claims and lack scientific evidence. It is important for readers to critically evaluate the content of each article and consider alternative perspectives.

4. Do mainstream scientists consider "Journal for semi-crackpots" as credible?

Mainstream scientists may not consider a "Journal for semi-crackpots" as a credible source of information. This is because the journal publishes unconventional and controversial ideas that may not align with mainstream scientific beliefs. However, it is still important for scientists to consider and evaluate all ideas and theories, regardless of their source.

5. Is a "Journal for semi-crackpots" a legitimate scientific journal?

A "Journal for semi-crackpots" may not be considered a legitimate scientific journal by some, as it publishes unconventional and controversial ideas. However, as long as the journal follows proper scientific protocols and peer-review processes, it can be considered a legitimate platform for scientific discourse and exchange of ideas.

Similar threads

Physics Avoiding the Crackpot Trap: Tips for Amateur Physicists with Graduate Knowledge
    • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
26
Views
3K
Physics Publishing Physics Discoveries: Recommendations for Unconventional Journals
    • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
1
Views
2K
Is Vixra a crackpot site or an alternative ?
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
21
Views
12K
I Is There A Simple Dark Matter Solution Rooted In GR?
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Counterpart of Feynman integral in de Broglie-Bohm theory
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
22
Views
2K
I Deur Gravitational self-interaction Doesn't Explain Galaxy Rotation Curves
    • Beyond the Standard Models
3
Replies
72
Views
6K
PhD in condensed matter theory or theoretical cosmology
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
1K
What specific field in physics would best fit me? programs?
    • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Two recent tests of loop quantum gravity theory
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
662
B Balancing theories and empirical data, especially concerning string theory
    • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
47
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top