Is the electric force responsible for this phenomena?

In summary, when powder is added to water, it dissolves and reduces the surface tension, causing the particles to spread rapidly due to the Marangoni effect. This does not significantly increase the temperature of the water, as the energy provided is used to reduce surface tension and promote diffusion.
  • #1
fluidistic
Gold Member
3,924
261
I just used some species in a salsa for a couscous. The species were in powder form. When I put them in contact with the water of the salsa, they spread over a large part of the water' surface. It reminded me the electrons of a negatively charged conductor.
Whatever was the spice, the effect took place.
Is the electric force held responsible for such a behavior of little macroscopic particles? I know that the species are neutral but they could be somehow polarized, or not?
I've already seen this phenomena in many other opportunities.
I've also read the article http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=particle-dispersion-liquid but I don't understand it well.
What I understand from it is that the powder reduces water surface and thus the energy of the water decreases (why?), implying an increase of energy in the small macroscopic particles (*). Fine but shouldn't they spread slowly despite their fast velocities? Like when one opens a perfume, the smell being "fast" molecules takes time to reach a 1 meter distance because of the Brownian motion or so. (I'm not an expert on this, I might be wrong).


(*) But why doesn't the powder make pressure on water an increase the temperature of water, thus increasing the internal energy of water instead of decreasing it?


I'm confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Could someone explain this phenomena to me? The phenomena that you are observing is a result of the interplay between surface tension and solubility of the powder. When the powder comes into contact with the water, it dissolves and reduces the surface tension of the liquid, causing the particles to spread out rapidly. This is known as the Marangoni effect. The decrease in surface tension also causes the dissolved particles to diffuse away from the parts of the liquid that are more concentrated in the powders, creating a gradient of concentration which further promotes the spreading of the particles. As for why the powder does not increase the temperature of the water, this is because the powder is not providing enough energy to raise the temperature of the liquid significantly. The energy provided by the powder is instead used to reduce the surface tension of the liquid and promote the diffusion of the particles.
 
  • #3


I can say that the electric force is not directly responsible for the phenomenon you described. The spreading of particles in a liquid is due to a combination of factors such as surface tension, Brownian motion, and the properties of the particles themselves. While the particles may be polarized, this does not necessarily mean that the electric force is the driving factor behind their movement.

The article you mentioned discusses the concept of surface tension, which is the force that causes a liquid to minimize its surface area. When particles are introduced into the liquid, they disrupt this balance and cause the surface area to decrease. This decrease in surface area results in a decrease in surface energy and an increase in the energy of the particles, causing them to move and spread out.

In terms of the powder reducing the water's surface energy, it is important to remember that energy is not always conserved in a system. In this case, the energy is being transferred from the water to the particles, causing the particles to have higher energy and move more quickly. This does not necessarily mean that the internal energy of the water is decreasing, but rather that the overall energy of the system is changing.

The spreading of particles in a liquid may seem similar to the diffusion of perfume molecules, but the mechanisms behind them are different. The particles in a liquid are constantly in motion due to Brownian motion, which is the random movement of particles in a fluid. This, combined with the disruption of surface tension, causes the particles to spread quickly.

In summary, the electric force is not solely responsible for the behavior of particles in a liquid. It is a combination of various factors that ultimately lead to the spreading of particles. I would suggest further research and reading on surface tension and Brownian motion to better understand the phenomenon you observed.
 

Related to Is the electric force responsible for this phenomena?

1. What is the electric force?

The electric force is a fundamental force of nature that is responsible for the interaction between electrically charged particles. It can be attractive or repulsive and is caused by the presence of electric charge.

2. How does the electric force work?

The electric force works by exerting a push or pull between two charged particles. Like charges repel each other, while opposite charges attract each other. The strength of the force depends on the magnitude of the charges and the distance between them.

3. Is the electric force responsible for all phenomena?

No, the electric force is only responsible for phenomena involving electrically charged particles. Other fundamental forces, such as gravity and the strong and weak nuclear forces, are responsible for different phenomena in the universe.

4. Can the electric force be manipulated or controlled?

Yes, the electric force can be manipulated or controlled by changing the amount of charge on a particle, as well as the distance between charged particles. This is the basis for many technological applications, such as electronics and electric motors.

5. How does the electric force relate to everyday life?

The electric force plays a crucial role in our everyday lives. It is responsible for electricity, which powers our devices and appliances. It also allows for chemical reactions to occur, which are essential for our bodies to function. Without the electric force, many aspects of modern life would not be possible.

Similar threads

  • Electromagnetism
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
3
Views
992
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
941
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top