Is Space Discrete or Continuous in a Planck World?

In summary, the discussion explores the concept of the Planck scale and its potential implications on movement and space. It raises the question of whether space is continuous or discrete, and what this means for movement at such a small scale. There is no consensus among physicists on this topic, but some have proposed the idea of discrete position and time units at the Planck scale. This raises further questions about the possibility of collisions between two perfectly smooth flat planes separated by a distance of 1 Planck length, and the concept of objects being half a Planck length apart in a discrete universe. The topic delves into highly speculative ideas and is still a subject of debate among experts.
  • #1
dst
380
0
On a ruler, you could move from the 1cm marking on a ruler to the 2cm marking, or you could move from the 0.5cm marking to the 1.5cm marking - both are 1cm movements but you cannot go from 1.5cm to 1cm in a 1cm movement. If we had Planck co-ordinates, could you move from 1 => 2 and also 1.5 => 2.5, and from 1 => 1.5?

Also, in a hypothetical world where all movement occurs by contact alone, suppose we have two perfectly smooth flat planes, and no "action at a distance" in any way, separated exactly by 1 Planck length. Could these plates collide?

In other words - is space continuous but appears discrete when probed, or is it absolutely discrete?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
the Planck scale is pretty ridiculously tiny (10-25 the size of atoms). i don't think any human being knows exactly what movement could be happening down at that scale. i don't think it is widely accepted physics, but i think some physicists (maybe they were physicist wannabees, i can't remember who it was) have hypothesized that reality might be discrete in position and time (kinda like cellular automata) and that the Planck Length is the unit of discrete length and the Planck Time is the unit of discrete time. but nobody knows if that is true. if it happens to be true, then movement could only be in discrete amounts (equal to either one Planck Length in any direction or zero movement) and would happen at discrete times (separated by the Planck Time). there would be no halfway between adjacent Planck length positions. i dunno. it's "highly speculative".
 
  • #3
it all depends on your coordinate axis. I think the answer to your question is yes. You can move one cm to right, or you can move one Planck distance to the right. Don't think of it in terms of 0.5 -> 1.5 or something. The physical part is only the difference (1), not the actual coordinate representation, because that depends where you set your origin.
However, you can't travel half a Planck length as far as i know. Planck length is the lowest meaningful distance. But I'm not an expert on this so take that with a grain of salt.

when i heard of spacetime being quantized this way, one idea crept into mind immediately: Matrix :)
 
  • #4
Mephisto said:
it all depends on your coordinate axis. I think the answer to your question is yes. You can move one cm to right, or you can move one Planck distance to the right. Don't think of it in terms of 0.5 -> 1.5 or something. The physical part is only the difference (1), not the actual coordinate representation, because that depends where you set your origin.
However, you can't travel half a Planck length as far as i know. Planck length is the lowest meaningful distance. But I'm not an expert on this so take that with a grain of salt.

when i heard of spacetime being quantized this way, one idea crept into mind immediately: Matrix :)

Well, here's a better example. Two infinitely large planes (1 Planck length thick, no EM fields or anything that can act with no contact) are accelerating towards each other, such that there's 1 Planck length between them. Both are accelerating at the same rate. Can they collide? If one suddenly stops then the other plane can go the Planck length between them and contact, but if neither stops, they have to move half a Planck length to collide.

As for the co-ordinates, of course that depends on your origin, but if an object is half a Planck length away from another, it doesn't matter. If we have the aforementioned two planes split apart such that they are half-integered distances apart, then one has to go through the other or what?

Of course there's an inherent fallacy in assuming you could even have a solid object at this scale, but Planet Hypothetia has to be weird.
 
  • #5
In a discrete system, a distance of 1 would be the same thing as two objects touching, being the closest two objects can possibly get two each other. So basically if two things were one Planck length apart in a discrete universe they would be colliding.
 

Related to Is Space Discrete or Continuous in a Planck World?

What is the Planck length?

The Planck length is a unit of length that is defined as the scale at which quantum gravitational effects become significant. It is approximately 1.616 x 10^-35 meters.

What is movement at the Planck length?

Movement at the Planck length is a concept in quantum mechanics that describes the smallest possible distance that can be measured or traveled. At this scale, the laws of physics, including space and time, may behave differently than at larger scales.

Why is the Planck length significant?

The Planck length is significant because it is the smallest possible length that can be measured or described by our current understanding of physics. It is also the scale at which quantum gravity is believed to become important, providing a link between the theories of general relativity and quantum mechanics.

Can anything be smaller than the Planck length?

According to our current understanding of physics, the Planck length is the smallest possible length that can exist. Anything smaller would require a new theory of physics to describe it.

How does the Planck length relate to the speed of light?

The Planck length is related to the speed of light through the Planck time, which is the time it takes for light to travel a distance of one Planck length. This is the smallest possible unit of time that can be measured and is approximately 5.391 x 10^-44 seconds.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
852
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
75
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top