Is Light's Medium the Luminiferous Aether or the Electromagnetic Field?

  • Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Aether
In summary: It is a wave, similar to elastic waves in a medium. This field is responsible for the propagation of light and its speed is defined relative to it. In the past, scientists believed in the existence of a medium called "Luminiferous Æther", but its nature was controversial. One of the controversies was that for light's frequency to increase, the interaction between the medium and light must be strong. However, the medium must also be transparent to matter in order to allow the Earth to travel through it without being affected. Nowadays, this concept is no longer relevant as the propagation of light is constant in any inertial reference frame according to Special Relativity. Additionally, the nonlinear effects that one would expect from a strong interaction with a medium
  • #1
spaghetti3451
1,344
33
Light as a wave: Interference and diffraction of light indicates light is a wave. Other waves like sound or water waves require a medium to propagate. The speed of the wave is defined relative to this medium. So what is the light’s medium? And can we measure our speed relative to the medium by measuring the speed of light?

At Einstein’s time it seemed obvious that there was such a medium—called “LuminiferousÆther ”—pervading the Universe. But its nature was very controversial. On one hand a wave is a perturbation of the æther and its frequency increases with the force which restores the equilibrium. To accommodate the very large frequencies of visible light the interaction between the medium and the light must be very strong. One the other hand the æther must be completely transparent to matter, allowing the Earth to travel trough it without affecting it.


I am having trouble understanding how the frequency of a must increase with the force which restores the equilibrium and why to accommodate the very large frequencies of visible light, the interaction between the medium and the light must be very strong.

I also find it difficult to see how this contradicts the fact that the æther must be completely transparent to matter, allowing the Earth to travel trough it without affecting it.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
failexam said:
Light as a wave: Interference and diffraction of light indicates light is a wave. Other waves like sound or water waves require a medium to propagate. The speed of the wave is defined relative to this medium. So what is the light’s medium? And can we measure our speed relative to the medium by measuring the speed of light?

At Einstein’s time it seemed obvious that there was such a medium—called “LuminiferousÆther ”—pervading the Universe. But its nature was very controversial. On one hand a wave is a perturbation of the æther and its frequency increases with the force which restores the equilibrium. To accommodate the very large frequencies of visible light the interaction between the medium and the light must be very strong. One the other hand the æther must be completely transparent to matter, allowing the Earth to travel trough it without affecting it.


I am having trouble understanding how the frequency of a must increase with the force which restores the equilibrium and why to accommodate the very large frequencies of visible light, the interaction between the medium and the light must be very strong.

I also find it difficult to see how this contradicts the fact that the æther must be completely transparent to matter, allowing the Earth to travel trough it without affecting it.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Nowadays, even for those who promote an æther, the only characteristic they care about is that the propagation of light is c with regard to it. Since Special Relativity postulates that the propagation of light is c in any inertial reference frame, it kind of makes concerns over the issues you are raising a moot point.
 
  • #3
The idea behind the luminiferous ether was that light is analogous to elastic waves in a medium, and so each vibration required the ether to be pulled back and forth by the interaction. Consequently, the faster the vibration the greater the acceleration, and thus the greater the force required.

On the other hand there were not the nonlinear effects that one might expect from a strong interaction -- dispersion for example. Or scattering, or harmonic generation.
 
  • #4
failexam said:
I am having trouble understanding how the frequency of a must increase with the force which restores the equilibrium

Consider simple harmonic motion:

$$x = A \cos (kx - \omega t)$$

1. Calculate the acceleration by taking the derivative twice. Notice how it depends on ω.

2. What does that tell you about the force which produces that acceleration?
 
  • #5
Light's "medium" is the Electro-magnetic field.
 

Related to Is Light's Medium the Luminiferous Aether or the Electromagnetic Field?

1. What is the aether?

The aether is a concept that was proposed in the 19th century to explain the propagation of light and other electromagnetic waves. It was believed to be a medium that filled all of space and through which these waves traveled.

2. Is the aether a proven scientific fact?

No, the existence of the aether has not been proven through scientific experiments and observations. In fact, the concept of the aether was replaced by the theory of relativity in the early 20th century.

3. Why was the aether theory proposed in the first place?

At the time, the aether theory was an attempt to explain how light and electromagnetic waves could travel through a vacuum. It was also thought to be the medium that allowed for the transmission of gravitational forces.

4. Are there any modern theories that involve the aether?

No, the aether theory is no longer considered a valid explanation for the propagation of light and other electromagnetic waves. However, there are some fringe theories that still propose the existence of an aether-like medium, but these theories have not been widely accepted by the scientific community.

5. Can the existence of the aether ever be confirmed or disproven?

It is highly unlikely that the existence of the aether can ever be confirmed or disproven. The concept has been largely abandoned by mainstream science and is no longer considered a viable explanation. Additionally, advancements in technology and our understanding of the universe have made it highly unlikely that the aether theory will ever be proven true.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
706
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
447
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
914
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top