Exploring the Unknown: Electron Fluctuations & Quantized Time

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of an electron in quantum mechanics and whether or not it can exist outside of its light-cone. It is suggested that in order to properly address this issue, quantum field theory must be used. The problem of infinities arising from the quantum nature of charge is also brought up, but it is noted that the idea of measurement is an abstraction and there may be no real infinities. The concept of an electron being instantaneously annihilated is also discussed, with the understanding that its decay would not be instantaneous. The idea that the entire universe would be annihilated if a charge were to disappear is mentioned, but it is considered outdated.
  • #1
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
8,142
1,755
Perhaps this is an easy one for you experts our there. When we consider an electron that occupies some local and small region of space, and then we assume that this electron [if it means anything to talk about a particular one] is un-measured - back in an unknown state- but that by the laws of physics it must still exist with some radius of our local space Ct, where t is the time since our last measurement of the position of charge q, and that this electron then disappears from this local space due to some quantum fluctuation, or by some other acceptable mechanism allowed by Quantum Theory [I don't claim to understand what I'm into here]. Then what about the dE/dt of local space - E being the electric field of local space? Do we require that time is quantized here, or can dE/dt become infinite? Am I way off track here? It seems to me - based on my limited understanding of such strange stuff - that this situation is allowed. But it also seems that if it ever did happen and we would all go to infinitely magnetic...which would seem to be a problem. But I also understand that quantized time is still considered an unresolved proposition. Enlightenment please?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Plain old quantum mechanics is not relativistic -- an electron measured to be at a particular position is not constrained to be within its light-cone in QM, which gives you some tiny probability of it being anywhere at finite time (nothing goes infinite.)

Of course this is incorrect. If you want to really talk about the electric field, you need to quantize that, and switch to quantum field theory (QFT.) This is usually required for highly relativistic systems, too, because those often create/destroy particles which is not allowed in regular QM.
 
  • #3
OK. But given QFT or whatever proper option to address this issue, how do we avoid infinities due to the quantum nature of charge. Is the explanation quantized time, or is this a matter of properly interpreting the collapse of the wave function of the charge... I can't get past the problem that if charge is here and then not, i.e. if the wave function for the charge that was just here suddenly collapses at some distant location, which I think is allowed by some quantum processes, then it seems that something must save us from infinities. What? Time is the only thing that comes to mind
 
  • #4
I consider, that your problem needs to be connected with moving of electron in magnetic field and to consider an electron, as one electromagnetic wave, which is closed as a ring.
In figure is shown frame with the current, which creates inwardly of frame homogeneous magnetic field. Shall conditionally consider, that this is so. Inwardly of frame there is moving ring with current J.
I can think that in the left part of ring a velocity of positive charges vj is totalized to the speed of moving of ring v. In this case, the ring will be move to the left.
I can think that in the right part of ring a velocity of electrons is totalized to the speed of moving of ring v. In this case, the ring will be move to the right.
I can think that both processes go simultaneously. In this case, the ring will not be move, nor to the left, nor to the right.
By the way, answer to this technical question till now is absent.
http://www.sibnet.ru/~polytron/mag_2.gif [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
I can't get past the problem that if charge is here and then not, i.e. if the wave function for the charge that was just here suddenly collapses at some distant location, which I think is allowed by some quantum processes, then it seems that something must save us from infinities.
Nope, if I understand your question correctly. Supposedly when a measurement is done, collapse is instantaneous, so you would have infinite derivatives of some quantities. The idea of measurement is sort of an abstraction/idealization, so you might be able to argue that there are no real infinities -- but that's beyond my knowledge.

However, if an electron were to be instantaneously annihilated, it's not like the EM field around it would just disappear -- it would decay, but not instantaneously. I think you could figure out exactly how just by playing with Maxwell's equations and boundary conditions, but I'm not sure.
 
  • #6
Originally posted by damgo
Nope, if I understand your question correctly. Supposedly when a measurement is done, collapse is instantaneous, so you would have infinite derivatives of some quantities. The idea of measurement is sort of an abstraction/idealization, so you might be able to argue that there are no real infinities -- but that's beyond my knowledge.

However, if an electron were to be instantaneously annihilated, it's not like the EM field around it would just disappear -- it would decay, but not instantaneously. I think you could figure out exactly how just by playing with Maxwell's equations and boundary conditions, but I'm not sure.

Yes. As soon as you mentioned decay I wondered why this was not immediately obvious to me. Then I realized that I am recalling a statement by an undergrad prof who commented that if a charge was to simply disappear, the entire universe would be annihilated. [I think this is also supposed to happen with the intersection of two perfect EM plane waves...luckily nothings perfect]. Perhaps this comes from an outdated idea? I have no idea where he got this. Any ideas?
 

1. What are electron fluctuations?

Electron fluctuations are small, random changes in the number and position of electrons in a system. These fluctuations can occur due to thermal energy or quantum effects.

2. How do electron fluctuations affect our understanding of time?

Electron fluctuations play a crucial role in the concept of quantized time, which suggests that time may be discrete and made up of small, indivisible units. These fluctuations can cause variations in the rate at which time passes, challenging our traditional understanding of time as a continuous and linear concept.

3. How are electron fluctuations measured and observed?

Electron fluctuations can be observed using sophisticated instruments such as electron microscopes or scanning tunneling microscopes. These instruments allow us to see the movements and interactions of individual electrons, providing insight into their behavior and fluctuations.

4. What are some potential applications of understanding electron fluctuations?

Understanding electron fluctuations can have various applications in fields such as quantum computing, nanotechnology, and materials science. By harnessing and controlling these fluctuations, we can develop new technologies and materials with unique properties and capabilities.

5. How does the study of electron fluctuations contribute to our overall understanding of the universe?

The study of electron fluctuations is a fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics, which is the basis for our understanding of the behavior and interactions of particles at a subatomic level. By exploring electron fluctuations, we can gain a deeper understanding of the fundamental laws and principles that govern the universe.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
5
Views
754
Replies
1
Views
263
Replies
8
Views
379
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
880
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
602
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
30
Views
499
Back
Top