The time space unit structure

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of time and its relation to physical progress in the theory of Relativity. The time axiom is introduced, stating that time is always associated with physical progress and that it may exist in multiple forms. It is also noted that without physical progress, time does not exist. The concept of a time-space unit in a space point progress structure is explored, with the understanding that time progress is bound by other dimensions. The importance of blockade and unpermit progress in building the time-space structure is emphasized, and the idea of a reaction life longged factor in reducing time to zero is mentioned. The conversation concludes by discussing the limitations of the theory of Relativity in general scenarios.
  • #1
hey.like
71
0

To part away the complexity, all events or progresses are in Relativity reference frame.
The time axiom1 as follow: Time is with a physical progress always. perhaps progresses may be more than one.
If there is not a physical progress , the time isn't exist. If the time is mean clearnly, the moment is mean clearnly with the time. naturely the moment concepts is humans and part away the nature.
The time space unit in a space point progress structure as follow:
1: there is not a time progress in a point;
2: A time-space progress is in one dimension on a tiny time, this progress is repelled by another no time dimensions and to hold in primary, that is a oppesite action actted on a time dimension by another dimensions;
3: Time dimension progress is not to return first, but to slip another dimension in a space pointted progress, this is to form a dimensions controlled time dimension structure.
In a time dimension progress, time progress is bindded by another dimension, this action reason is from same progress action.
If the space dimension action is not complete, the time dimension progress will be to move, specially in one time and one dimension situation, this progress is blackade with this world, like black hole, heavy string progress. In this situation, the Relativity reference frame is meaningless. If a physical progress is not a referce action with it. What can do to right?
If a progress with a complete dimension action, it is a enable to repeat progress, if the action dimensions is opening, this progress isn't enable to repeat.
In complete dimension, it can be 3, 5, 7... and another structure, the time dimension progress is permit in high dimension progress.
In quantum size, blockade and unpermit progress is taking a important position, it's advantage is to build the time space structure base.
In experiment test, if the neutronoreaction reaction in mass exist, different energy level , it is existed a reaction life longged factor as m in time dimension progress to reduce to zero.
In another test, in laser cold condense charge near 0 K with E radiation . There is some charge quantum decrease.
The theory in Relativity reference frame isn't same ub generak situation, the physical theory is same right all as usual.



 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hey, like

how do I know you are serious? I read your post and sometimes I think we may be talking. But the thoughts you seem to want to discuss are rare here, and I have little success getting my own view to make any sense to anyone.

Still, I have an idea about dimensions in which timespace does not move, and so forms a spacetime structure (lattice) on which all we know is expressed.

No promises. But at least maybe we outcasts can try to talk to each other.

Richard T. Harbaugh
 

What is the time space unit structure?

The time space unit structure is a theoretical framework that attempts to explain the fundamental nature of space and time. It proposes that space is not a continuous, infinite fabric, but rather made up of tiny indivisible units called spacetime atoms. These atoms interact with each other to create the illusion of a continuous and smooth fabric of space.

How does the time space unit structure relate to Einstein's theory of relativity?

Einstein's theory of relativity is based on the concept of spacetime, where space and time are intricately connected. The time space unit structure takes this concept further by postulating that spacetime is made up of discrete units, providing a more granular understanding of the fabric of the universe.

What evidence supports the existence of the time space unit structure?

Currently, there is no direct evidence for the existence of the time space unit structure. However, some theories in quantum gravity, such as loop quantum gravity and causal dynamical triangulation, incorporate the concept of discrete spacetime units. Additionally, some experiments in quantum mechanics have shown evidence of quantized space and time, which aligns with the predictions of the time space unit structure.

How does the time space unit structure affect our understanding of the universe?

The time space unit structure challenges our traditional understanding of space and time as continuous and infinitely divisible. It suggests that there may be a fundamental limit to how small we can divide space and time, which has implications for our understanding of the fabric of the universe and the laws of physics that govern it.

Are there any practical applications of the time space unit structure?

Currently, there are no practical applications of the time space unit structure, as it is a theoretical framework that is still being studied and tested. However, if proven correct, it could potentially lead to advancements in our understanding of quantum mechanics, gravity, and the nature of the universe as a whole.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
868
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
315
  • Special and General Relativity
5
Replies
146
Views
6K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
95
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
69
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
41
Views
2K
Back
Top