- #1
Naty1
- 5,606
- 40
Following are some descriptions of Inflationary Model(s) of the Universe which are quite different than I have read elsewhere. My own view, I now believe, was likely a bit myopic. These comments reflect Paul Steinhardt and Neil Turoks' descriptions in their book ENDLESS UNIVERSE where they propose a cyclic model they call the ekpyrotic model. This is a cyclic, repeating, model that competes with inflationary, one time bang, models.
I'd be interested in comments from others regarding the general validity of these views of inflationary models.
(These are all from Chapter 10 of their book.)
and they imply the inflationary model has not addressed the cosmological constant
problem:
Please note I'm not advocating one model over another, only sharing ideas and trying to gain a better perspective.
I'd be interested in comments from others regarding the general validity of these views of inflationary models.
(These are all from Chapter 10 of their book.)
To a large degree the (wide) acceptance of the inflationary model is based on the simpler picture of inflation that emerged 25 years ago.
and they imply the inflationary model has not addressed the cosmological constant
problem:
Having failed to find a mechanism for making the cosmological constant small, they concluded that it must be large in most places, and that the observed universe must be an anomaly.
..the inflationary model is incomplete because there is no compelling reason for the universe to emerge in an inflationary state...Guth had not realized the eternal nature of inflation when he initially proposed the idea...(but) he has become a leading advocate of its importance..."
Something strange has happened in the inflationary picture. ..What began as an efficient mechanism for apparently explaining the simplicity of the universe-that is the smoothness and uniformity of the observable universe- has been turned into a run away process that seems extraordinarily wasteful and unpredictable in its use of space and time.
In the inflatonary model, most of cosmic history is spent creating more and more vacuum... regions of space with galaxies and stars occur only in rare pockets that are separated...by unimaginably vast expanses of empty space.
So far, eternal inflation has been described as if every pocket universe it creates is exactly like ours...but in recent years...theorists have realized that an inflationary multiverse(results) in which physical conditions vary greatly from pocket to pocket...this multiverse (beyond our own universe) is neither predictive nor verifiable...inflation populates all possibilities to an infinite degree, making it impossible to explain why the observable universe has the particular physical properties it has.
Please note I'm not advocating one model over another, only sharing ideas and trying to gain a better perspective.