Why is the frequency cut-off 0.707 in filters

In summary, the frequency cut-off for a simple RC filter can be found using the formula 1/(2*Pi*RC), which is derived from the Laplace transform of the characteristic equation of the circuit. The transfer function for a low pass filter is H(s) = 1/(1 + sRC), and the cutoff frequency is found by setting the power transfer function to 1/2, resulting in a value of 0.707. The same approach can be used for a high pass filter.
  • #1
franck_hunter
Hi Guys,

There is a formula which shows that the frequency cut-off (0.707) is found from 1/(2*Pi*RC). But why?

Could someone show me the proof, so that I could understand?


Thx in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This is for a very simple RC filter, I imagine. Soe you've got the low pass and the high pass. If you want a deep understanding, you should know how to deal with the impedances and the transfer function.

The impedences come from the Laplace transform of the characteristic equation of the circuit. It turns out that the impedance for a capacitor is ZC = 1/sC and the impedance for a resistor is R. That s is a complex frequency. The real part is a characteristic decay and the imaginary part is a characteristic frequency.

To get the transfer function, you use the simple voltage divider model. For the low pass filter, the capacitor is the shunt, so the voltage divider gives the transfer function as:

H(s) = ZC/(ZC + R) = 1/(1 + sRC)

If the input doesn't introduce any inherent decay (it is steady state), the system responds as:

H(jw) = 1/(1 + jwRC) = 1/(1 + j2πfRC)

This is a complex valued function of the variable, f, which is the steady-state frequency of the input. It has a power transfer associated with it that is the square of the magnitude of this amplitude transfer:

|H(f)|2 = 1/(1 + 4π2f2R2C2)

When this equals 1/2, that is considered the cufoff point (3 dB point), and the frequency associated with it is the cufoff frequency (3 dB frequency). Notice that the squareroot of 1/2 = 0.707.

The freqency that satisfies the condition is easily seen from the power transfer function as:

f3dB = 1/(2πRC)

It is a very similar treatment for the high pass.
 
  • #3
Thank you very much for the complete explanation.:wink:
 

1. Why is the frequency cut-off set at 0.707 in filters?

The frequency cut-off at 0.707 is a standard value that is used in filter design. It is based on the concept of the Butterworth filter, which is a type of low-pass filter that has a flat frequency response in the passband and a sharp roll-off in the stopband. The frequency at which the filter's response drops to 70.7% of its maximum value is defined as the cut-off frequency. This value is chosen to minimize distortion and ensure a smooth transition between the passband and stopband.

2. How does the frequency cut-off affect the filter's performance?

The frequency cut-off determines the range of frequencies that can pass through the filter. For a low-pass filter, frequencies below the cut-off value are allowed to pass through, while frequencies above the cut-off are attenuated. The lower the cut-off frequency, the more frequencies will be allowed to pass through, resulting in a less restrictive filter. However, a lower cut-off frequency also means that the filter will have a slower roll-off, which may not be suitable for certain applications.

3. Can the frequency cut-off be adjusted for different types of filters?

Yes, the frequency cut-off can be adjusted for different types of filters. For example, in high-pass filters, the cut-off frequency determines the point at which frequencies below the cut-off are attenuated and frequencies above are allowed to pass through. Similarly, in band-pass filters, the cut-off frequencies define the range of frequencies that are allowed to pass through. The cut-off frequency can also be adjusted in order to achieve a steeper or more gradual roll-off in the filter's response.

4. What other factors besides the frequency cut-off should be considered in filter design?

Besides the frequency cut-off, other important factors in filter design include the filter's order, type, and slope. The filter's order refers to the number of poles or stages in the filter, which determines the steepness of the filter's response. The type of filter, such as Butterworth, Chebyshev, or Bessel, also affects the shape of the filter's response. The slope of the filter's response refers to how quickly the filter attenuates frequencies above the cut-off. These factors should all be considered in determining the appropriate frequency cut-off for a specific filter design.

5. Is a frequency cut-off of 0.707 always the most optimal choice?

The selection of the frequency cut-off value depends on the specific requirements and goals of the filter design. While 0.707 is a commonly used value, it may not be the most optimal choice in all cases. For example, in applications where a sharper roll-off is needed, a lower cut-off frequency may be chosen. In other cases, a higher cut-off frequency may be preferred in order to allow more frequencies to pass through. Ultimately, the most optimal frequency cut-off will depend on the specific parameters and specifications of the filter design.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
962
Replies
4
Views
894
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
763
Replies
1
Views
654
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top