Oct 31, 2013 Admin #2 Ackbach Indicium Physicus Staff member Jan 26, 2012 4,205 Re: Inequality with abs What have you tried?
Oct 31, 2013 Thread starter #3 O oooppp2 New member Oct 21, 2013 19 Re: Inequality with abs I tried this (you can pretty much ignore the table and go straight to case a and case b. 2013-10-31 20.14.27.jpg
Re: Inequality with abs I tried this (you can pretty much ignore the table and go straight to case a and case b. 2013-10-31 20.14.27.jpg
Oct 31, 2013 Admin #4 Ackbach Indicium Physicus Staff member Jan 26, 2012 4,205 Re: Inequality with abs So where are you stuck? You're almost there!
Oct 31, 2013 #5 SuperSonic4 Well-known member MHB Math Helper Mar 1, 2012 249 Re: Inequality with abs You're virtually done now, time to smash the final obstacle
Oct 31, 2013 Thread starter #6 O oooppp2 New member Oct 21, 2013 19 Re: Inequality with abs Isn't $x<5$ the correct answer?
Oct 31, 2013 Admin #7 Ackbach Indicium Physicus Staff member Jan 26, 2012 4,205 Re: Inequality with abs You have to think logic here. Do both sides of your solution have to be true at the same time (logical AND), or does only one of them have to be true at a time (logical OR)?
Re: Inequality with abs You have to think logic here. Do both sides of your solution have to be true at the same time (logical AND), or does only one of them have to be true at a time (logical OR)?
Oct 31, 2013 Thread starter #8 O oooppp2 New member Oct 21, 2013 19 Re: Inequality with abs Would this be a better answer "for x<-1 we have x<1 and for x>-1 we have x<5" since it's a bit more broad?
Re: Inequality with abs Would this be a better answer "for x<-1 we have x<1 and for x>-1 we have x<5" since it's a bit more broad?