If Uranium's half life is 4.5 billion years, why does it become waste

In summary, the conversation discusses the topic of nuclear energy and the disposal of radioactive waste. The main question is why uranium, with a half-life of 4.5 billion years, becomes waste at a reactor before it decays 4.5 billion years later. The conversation explores the concept of nuclear reactors and how they use enriched uranium to produce energy through fission. However, this process also creates radioactive waste, which is composed of fission products that are highly radioactive. The conversation also touches on the potential for reprocessing nuclear waste to reduce its volume.
  • #36
splitringtail said:
Waste is a subjective term. If I put my soda cans in the trash and it goes to a landfill, then it is pretty much waste even though it can be recycled.
Yes - but it is also a legal definition.

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/glossary/high-level-radioactive-waste-hlw.html

http://www.nrc.gov/waste/high-level-waste.html

Then there is industrial waste, which could be organic (hydrocarbon) chemical waste or heavy metals. Some organic chemical and all heavy metals are generally classified as toxic waste. The goal is to isolate the waste from the environment and people, just as the nuclear industry and government have the goal to keep radionuclides isolated from the environment and people. On the other hand, not all non-radioactive industrial waste is not necessarily as restricted as 'nuclear waste'.

Much of spent fuel (~95-96%) can be used again (recycled/reprocessed), with the remain 4-5% calcined and vitrified into a mineral that should be placed in a geological stable respository.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Astronuc said:
Much of spent fuel (~95-96%) can be used again (recycled/reprocessed), with the remain 4-5% calcined and vitrified into a mineral that should be placed in a geological stable respository.

I imagine if we had the technology to make reprocessigne economically feasible so that each radioistope could be isolated, even that remainder would be usable as some calibration or reference standard.
 
  • #38
Astronuc said:
Yes - but it is also a legal definition.

True, they are legal definitions of course, hazardous waste has to be regulated.

Speaking of industrial waste, Xylene, Toulene, and some variants of Mineral Spirits are aromatic hydrocarbons that can be purchased from any hardware store, usually for thinning paints. I have always wondered how many of the homeowners and other small time users dispose of such chemicals. It would not be surprise me if most simply poured them down the drain or dump it on the ground, rather than putting it in an appropriate container and taking it a hazardous material facility.

Edit: To be a little fair for some places, a nearby hazardous material place would probably be a very long drive.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
804
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top