If an object is not quantized does it have a wave function?

In summary: More precisely there cannot be interference because probabiity is assumed to follow normalised matter density ##\rho##. The mapping from phase space to probability is not the same as in QT.
  • #1
Nickyv2423
46
3
Is there a relationship between the quantization of an object and its wave function? If an object isn't quantized does it have a wave function? For example, in string theory branes are not quantized, so do they have wave functions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Objects are not quantized, measurable properties of objects can be. If you have an electron that is confined inside a finite space, its kinetic energy is quantized and can have only certain values. On the other hand, the kinetic energy of an unconfined free electron is not quantized. In both cases the state of the electron can be described with a wave function, but the free electron wavefunction doesn't have to be normalizable like the wavefunction of a confined electron.
 
  • #3
I take it a free electron does not have to be normalised because free electrons do not exist anywhere.
 
  • #4
hilbert2 said:
but the free electron wavefunction doesn't have to be normalizable like the wavefunction of a confined electron.
That's not correct. The wave function must always be normalizable, which is why a plane wave is not a valid state for an electron, and a superposition of plane waves (wave packet) is needed to correctly describe the state of a free particle.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and vanhees71
  • #5
Not to be pedantic but is it correct to say a wave packet is not a free particle because it has to be in a potential to be in a superposition state.

Anyhoo good luck finding a region in the universe that is field free to support a free electron. Free particles seem mythical in the strict sense in my amateur opinion.
 
  • #6
houlahound said:
Anyhoo good luck finding a region in the universe that is field free to support a free electron. Free particles seem mythical in the strict sense in my amateur opinion.

It's easy to find free electrons: CRT displays, pre-flatscreen TV sets, vacuum tubes, lightning, static discharges... Electrons are so mobile that free electrons are responsible for almost all the transfers of electric charge that we see in daily life.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes clarkvangilder and vanhees71
  • #7
houlahound said:
Not to be pedantic but is it correct to say a wave packet is not a free particle because it has to be in a potential to be in a superposition state.
Not correct. A particle is free if its total energy (kinetic plus potential) is positive when using the convention that the potential at infinity is zero.

Whether it's free or bound has nothing to do with superposition, and there is no such thing as a quantum state that is not a superposition in some basis.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude and vanhees71
  • #8
I have never seen a formal definition of free, I figured it must be free of all fields which excludes even weak fields relative the particles energy.

I guess you are saying an electron is free if it is ionised. Not trying to make up my own definitions but free is a pretty in accurate term the way you have defined it.

All electrons are in a gravity energy well at least, hence minimally bound.

Oh well my definition is wrong, I learned something.

If I was more adept I would like to calculate how gravity effects the spectra of a particle in a box problem, know any links for that?

BTW will start a separate thread re superposition.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
DrClaude said:
That's not correct. The wave function must always be normalizable, which is why a plane wave is not a valid state for an electron, and a superposition of plane waves (wave packet) is needed to correctly describe the state of a free particle.

To put it more exactly, in the case of a confined electron, unnormalizable position repr. wavefunctions don't appear even as a mathematical tool in the eigenfunction expansions of the wavepackets.
 
  • #11
Demystifier said:
It is possible to introduce a classical wave function in classical statistical physics:
https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0505143

That's quite cool... So the positivity of this classical wavefunction (mentioned in the abstract) prevents interference phenomena from happening in the classical case?
 
  • #12
hilbert2 said:
That's quite cool... So the positivity of this classical wavefunction (mentioned in the abstract) prevents interference phenomena from happening in the classical case?
Exactly!
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #13
hilbert2 said:
That's quite cool... So the positivity of this classical wavefunction (mentioned in the abstract) prevents interference phenomena from happening in the classical case?
More precisely there cannot be interference because probabiity is assumed to follow normalised matter density ##\rho##. The mapping from phase space to probability is not the same as in QT.
 

Related to If an object is not quantized does it have a wave function?

1. What is a wave function?

A wave function is a mathematical description of the quantum state of a system. It represents the probability amplitude of finding a particle in a particular location or state.

2. How is quantization related to the wave function?

In quantum mechanics, quantization refers to the restriction of certain physical quantities, such as energy or angular momentum, to discrete values. The wave function describes the quantized state of a system, where the particle's position and momentum can only take on certain values.

3. Can an object be both quantized and have a wave function?

Yes, in quantum mechanics, all particles have both a wave-like and a particle-like nature. This means that they can exhibit wave-like properties, such as being quantized, while also behaving like a localized particle with a specific position and momentum.

4. Is it possible for an object to not be quantized but still have a wave function?

No, the wave function is a fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics and is used to describe the behavior of all particles. If an object is not quantized, it means that its energy or other physical quantities can take on any value, which goes against the principles of quantum mechanics.

5. How is the wave function related to the uncertainty principle?

The uncertainty principle states that it is impossible to know both the exact position and momentum of a particle at the same time. The wave function incorporates this principle by representing the probability of finding a particle in a particular location or state, rather than its exact position or momentum.

Similar threads

Replies
78
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
218
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
670
Replies
7
Views
740
Replies
4
Views
826
Back
Top