How to travel faster than light - why wont this work?

In summary, achieving speeds higher than the speed of light is impossible according to the laws of physics. However, if we were to hypothetically have a main spaceship the size of our solar system, and a smaller spaceship inside it traveling at 90% the speed of light, the combined speed would not exceed the speed of light. This is because velocities do not add up in the same way in special relativity as they do in Newtonian mechanics, due to the relativity of simultaneity and the effects of time dilation and length contraction.
  • #1
Erazman
66
0
what if the size of our main spaceship was unlimited.
Let's say our spaceship is the size of our solar system.
Reach the highest speed possible without breaking any laws of physics.
Lets say -- 90% the speed of light.


Now fly a smaller spaceship INSIDE the main ship as fast as you can (lets say -- 90% the speed of light).

You are now traveling 180% the speed of light through space.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The spaceship doesn't have to have an unlimited mass (which is also impossible) for this scenario. One of the basic rules of special relativity is that velocities don't add up like they do in normal Newtonian mechanics.
 
  • #3
See How Do You Add Velocities in Special Relativity? If the large ship is moving at 0.9c relative to me, and the small ship is moving at 0.9c in the same direction relative to the large ship, then according to the formula for velocity addition the velocity of the small ship relative to me will be (0.9c + 0.9c)/(1 + 0.9*0.9) = 1.8c/1.81 = 0.994475c. Basically, the reason velocities don't add the same way in relativity as in Newtonian mechanics is because each observer uses rulers and clocks at rest with respect to himself, with the clocks synchronized in his rest frame, to measure distances and times (and each observer defines velocity in his frame in terms of distance/time according to his own measurements). Since each observer sees rulers shrink when they move relative to him, and clocks slow down, and each rest frame has a different definition of what it means for clocks to be "synchronized" (this is known as 'the relativity of simultaneity'), this should give you a rough idea of why you can't just add velocities the normal way.
 

Related to How to travel faster than light - why wont this work?

1. How is it possible to travel faster than light?

According to Einstein's theory of relativity, the speed of light is the ultimate speed limit in the universe. It is impossible to accelerate an object with mass to the speed of light, let alone faster than it. Therefore, traveling faster than light is currently not possible according to our current understanding of physics.

2. What are the consequences of traveling faster than light?

If it were possible to travel faster than light, it would violate the principles of causality and time-travel paradoxes could occur. This means that an effect could occur before its cause, leading to logical inconsistencies. It would also require infinite energy to achieve such a speed, which is not feasible.

3. Can advancements in technology make it possible to travel faster than light?

While technology has allowed us to travel faster and more efficiently, it cannot overcome the fundamental limitations set by the laws of physics. As mentioned earlier, the speed of light is the ultimate speed limit, and it is impossible to surpass it.

4. Are there any theories or ideas that suggest faster-than-light travel is possible?

There have been some theories and ideas proposed, such as wormholes and warp drives, that suggest faster-than-light travel could be possible. However, these are purely speculative and have not been proven to work in practice. They also come with their own set of technical and theoretical challenges.

5. What are some alternative ways to travel long distances in space without exceeding the speed of light?

One possible alternative is to use time dilation, where an object moves at sub-light speeds, but time passes slower for that object compared to a stationary observer. This could allow for a relatively faster travel time, although it would still take many years to reach even the closest stars.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
603
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
65
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
98
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top