How to Specify Replacement Spur Gears for Worn-Out Parts?

  • Thread starter Ouabache
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Gear
In summary: The pitch diameter...the largest diameter of the gears.3. The face width...the width of the gear teeth.4. The bore diameter...the diameter of the inside of the gear teeth.5. The hub projection...the distance from the center of the hub to the center of the gear teeth.6. The hub diameter...the diameter of the hub.7. The outside diameter...the diameter of the gear teeth on the outside of the gear.8. The face width...the width of the gear teeth on the inside of the gear.9. The pressure angle...the angle of the gear teeth from the vertical.In summary, the gears
  • #1
Ouabache
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
1,346
8
This is outside of my area of expertise, which is why I making this post.

I'd like to replace a couple of spur gears that have worn out, but am not familiar with descriptive terminology. How may I determine what gears to order? I want to make sure I order equivalent parts. The originals are plastic, I am inclined to replace them with metal (for longevity). Is that wise? Or is choice of material, an important design consideration. (example: Is there sufficient power to turn new metal gears versus plastic?)

Here are a few terms I ran across in the parts catalogs: diametric pitch, pressure angle, face width, bore diam., pitch diameter, hub projection, hub diameter, outside diam, face width. I assume I need to measure these on my failed parts. How do you recommend I go about this? (i have already made a web search for gear parts nomenclature)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I doubt you're going to find an exact replacement unless you get the part number and go straight to the source. I'm not sure, but I doubt gears are close to being as standardized as other machine parts (such as screws). There's just too many design variables to consider.

I worked on gearboxes in my last job. Granted, they were aerospace gearboxes, but pretty much every single thing with gear teeth had it's own separate, detailed drawings. The actual gear data was given in a chart, but it's whatever the gears were attached to that required its own drawings. Nevertheless, the gear data was quite complicated. It included the terms you mentioned, plus many others. Root diameter, TIF (true involute form), number of teeth (obviously), tooth thickness/ space width, over/under pin measurements, and who knows what else. Then there'd be other geometric features such as chamfers or radii at the tips and roots, and all these terms had their tolerances which, if they were overstepped, could very well result in adverse mating conditions.

Again, I don't know if the part you're looking for is standardized, but if it is then you'll probably just need to figure out who/ how made it, and see if they make the same thing out of metal.
 
  • #3
Perhaps the tolerances on the device I am working on is forgiving. This gear is part of the mechanism inside an office paper shredder. The original failed part is plastic, (broken teeth). For a practical solution, what are the minimum criteria needed to order replacement parts? (for example: gear diameter, number of teeth, shape of teeth) ?
 
  • #4
Ouabache said:
Perhaps the tolerances on the device I am working on is forgiving. This gear is part of the mechanism inside an office paper shredder. The original failed part is plastic, (broken teeth). For a practical solution, what are the minimum criteria needed to order replacement parts? (for example: gear diameter, number of teeth, shape of teeth) ?

i can say from the back of my head that you will need at least 3 things: module, # of teeth and a diameter, which the name i do not know in english but looking at a picture on wikipedia its either a pitch or base diameter, one of those 2.
 
  • #5
QTC has a very good online tech library that may help you figure out what you need.
WM Berg is another good source.
http://www.qtcgears.com/
http://www.wmberg.com/
 
  • #6
Thanks for your suggestions! With you're help, I'm getting better at
describing these gears.
 
  • #7
Boston Gear has a gear catalog in their "literature" that has a section on specifying gears that explains a lot of this. The pressure angle is very important (must match in mating gears). Fortunately that appears standardized as 20, 25, or 14.5 degrees in older machines. I don't know about metric gears, they could be completely different standards?

See also Shigley Mechanical Engineering Design
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Is the shredder manufacturer no longer in business?
 
  • #9
Sorry for the necropost. They might be out of business by now.
 
  • #10
spur gear application and documentation

If you need a free application to create spur gears and you need some documentation regarding nomenclature, visit www.me-bac.com.

B.R.
 
  • #11
Ya got to check this out for spur gears

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
gmax137 said:
Boston Gear has a gear catalog in their "literature" that has a section on specifying gears that explains a lot of this. The pressure angle is very important (must match in mating gears). Fortunately that appears standardized as 20, 25, or 14.5 degrees in older machines. I don't know about metric gears, they could be completely different standards?

See also Shigley Mechanical Engineering Design

Don't make this any more difficult than it has to be.

The tooth form will always be an involute; don't even think about using any other form.

14.5 degree pressure angles are long since obsolete. Modern gears are always 20 or 25 deg pressure angle.

As to what you need (assuming that this is a mating pair that is worn out) ...
1. The center to center distances must match the originals (this is the sum of the actual pitch radii)
2. The ratio of the pitch radii must agree with the ratio of the tooth numbers (to get the correct ratio)
3. Bore diameters must suit the shaft diameters
4. Face width must be adequate for the loads (if going from plastic to steel this should be easy; the other way could be difficult)
These are the essentials.

If possible, I would measure the worn out gears to try to determine the original spec. The easy measurement is over the addendum, and assuming they are standard gears, you can work back to the pitch diameter from there. The teeth are easy to count, so that is not a problem either.

After you select a pair of gears that appear to work, use their specs to check strength, contact ratio (should be > 2, if possible) and if everything is OK, order them.
 

Related to How to Specify Replacement Spur Gears for Worn-Out Parts?

1. What is a spur gear and how does it work?

A spur gear is a type of mechanical gear that consists of a cylindrical wheel with teeth that mesh with another gear to transmit power and motion. It works by transferring rotational motion from one gear to another through the meshing of their teeth.

2. How do I specify the size of a spur gear?

The size of a spur gear is typically specified by its pitch diameter, which is the diameter of the imaginary pitch circle that the gear's teeth would lie on. This can be calculated by dividing the number of teeth on the gear by the gear's diametral pitch (teeth per inch).

3. What are the important parameters to consider when specifying a spur gear?

When specifying a spur gear, it is important to consider the number of teeth, pitch diameter, pressure angle, gear ratio, and material. These parameters will determine the gear's size, strength, and compatibility with other gears in the system.

4. How do I determine the gear ratio for a spur gear?

The gear ratio for a spur gear is determined by dividing the number of teeth on the driven gear by the number of teeth on the driving gear. For example, if the driving gear has 20 teeth and the driven gear has 40 teeth, the gear ratio would be 1:2.

5. What materials are commonly used for spur gears?

Spur gears are often made from a variety of materials, including steel, brass, aluminum, and plastic. The material chosen will depend on the specific application and the desired properties, such as strength, durability, and cost.

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • General Engineering
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top