When the Army Owns the Weather

  • Thread starter Carlos Hernandez
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Army Weather
In summary, the government's involvement in weather control experiments is not a new concept, as weather manipulation has been attempted for centuries. However, the extent to which it can be controlled is limited and not as advanced as some may believe. The market for weather-related products and equipment will continue to exist, and the idea of completely eliminating natural weather phenomena may not be beneficial in the long run.
  • #1
Carlos Hernandez
84
0
The following is from http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=12342

When the Army Owns the Weather

By Bob Fitrakis, Columbus Alive
February 5, 2002

Humans have long sought to control the weather. Early people learned how to make fire and modify their micro-environments; rain dances and other rituals to alleviate droughts are part of our folklore. So news that the government is engaged in secret experiments to control the weather should come as no surprise – especially after a long history of "cloud seeding," "atom splitting" and cloning revelations.

In fact, a vast majority of people would be shocked to learn that this orphan of the cold war is still in practice. As the U.S. and former Soviet Union spent trillions of dollars on their militaries, their commitment to mutually assured destruction led to extensive experimentation with the use of weather as a weapon. In 1977, the Saturday Review cited a CIA report hinting that the U.S. government already had the power to massively manipulate the weather for war purposes.

Complete article is at http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=12342
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Sure, weather manipulation, such as causing lightning to strike a certian place or manipulating something about a particular storm is doable to some degree, but it's not like the govt will have some miraculous weather control center anytime in the foreseable future.

I saw that lighting strike on demand thing in 6th grade when we were doing weather, just shoot some sort of rocket in the sky and bam, their lightning rod got hit. I don't really see why you'd want to harnass lightning, when we have missiles that are much more accurate and powerful.

And yeah, a plane can drop some stuff into a storm to make it weaker, but it's not like you can have a plane drop something to start a massive hurricane over enemy troops or anything.
 
  • #3
Yeah, the market for all-weather fighters and raincoats for infantry isn't going to dry up (so to speak) any time soon.

And quite frankly, I think a little weather control would be a GOOD thing. In Star Trek, they eliminate hurricanes and tornados.

I've never really understood the fixation with HAARP though.
 
  • #4
Elimination of hurricanes and tornadoes would be a bad thing, they are necessary for the functioning of the environment. The correct thing to do is to rebuild all destroyed buildings, and this time make them more suitable to that weather, instead of the same as they were before they were destroyed.
Unless of course one can artificially induce the same good effects of tornadoes and hurricanes while stopping all natural ones, but then that gets overcomplicated.
 

1. What is the concept of the Army owning the weather?

The concept of the Army owning the weather refers to the idea that the United States military has the ability to control and manipulate weather patterns for military purposes.

2. Is the Army currently able to control the weather?

While the Army has conducted research and experiments on weather modification, there is no evidence that they currently have the ability to control or manipulate weather patterns.

3. What methods does the Army use to manipulate the weather?

The Army has explored various methods of weather manipulation, including cloud seeding, fog dispersal, and even creating artificial lightning. However, these methods have not been proven to be effective on a large scale.

4. Is it ethical for the Army to manipulate the weather?

Many ethicists argue that manipulating the weather for military purposes can have unintended consequences and may cause harm to innocent civilians. However, others argue that it could potentially be used for humanitarian purposes, such as creating rain in drought-stricken areas.

5. What are the potential consequences of the Army owning the weather?

The potential consequences of the Army owning the weather are largely unknown, as the technology to effectively control weather patterns does not currently exist. However, some speculate that it could lead to global political conflicts and environmental damage if used recklessly.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
29
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
7K
Back
Top