What are the effects of boycotting on underdeveloped or developing countries?

  • News
  • Thread starter quantumcarl
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Effects
In summary, the conversation discusses the effects of boycotts and embargos on underdeveloped or developing countries such as North Korea, Cuba, and Iraq. While there is conflicting information and opinions about the amount of aid and supplies being given to these countries, the main focus is on the impact of these restrictions on the people and regimes. The conversation raises questions about the effectiveness of embargos in promoting change and improving conditions in these nations.
  • #1
quantumcarl
770
0
No, I'm not referring to the latest anti-Canadianism going on in the B(eautiful)US of A. (Actually that's all a cover for our special-ops... from the JTF2... who have been in Iraq for 2 months preparing the way for what was supposed to be a quick change of regime (and lube and filter).

Yes, we have good Canadian guys running around in arab costumes getting very close to what has been considered good targets... and minimizing colateral damage.

We also have troops working with American AWACs and on the ground with American troops. We also have ships off-shore in support of your wonderful men and women and what little troops we have left are still in Bosnia and Afganistan.

So... next time you want to buy Maple Syrup or Molson's Canadian Beer... don't feel bad... we're here to help everyone. Have a good beer!

What I wanted this topic to examine are the effects of boycotts on underdeveloped or developing countries.

Here are some examples:

North Korea. Here we see that some administration has had no boycott against giving the North Korean's money... 90billion in loans and grants... yet the country has had a boycott surrounding it concerning other essencials like paper, food, clothing and things like that.

Any comments about this dilemma would be appreciated.

Cuba. Here we see a small island nation surviving on what they can produce themselves because some administration has decided they are bad and they don't get products or raw materials from anyone in the world. I have confirmation, now, that Cuba has a 99% literacy rate and a very low crime rate. But, they are boycotted for some reason.

And comments?

Iraq. Boycotts against Iraq have been on and off. They get lots of money for military spending but no medical supplies or exchange teachers or food or whatever. No training. What's with this?

Comments?

I suppose there is a larger list of boycotted countries and it would be nice to have them all to do the best possible study on what effects boycotts have on a nation.

In my opinion, boycotting turns a nation into a starved animal. It makes them want to fight. There is a natural tendency for them to want to expand in the hope of new resources. It makes them very aggressive. Even North Korea has come to the point where they threaten the United States with Nukes. Nukes built with American money.

Curiousor and curiousor.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
North Korea. Here we see that some administration has had no boycott against giving the North Korean's money... 90billion in loans and grants... yet the country has had a boycott surrounding it concerning other essencials like paper, food, clothing and things like that.
Huh? Source? $90 billion is more foreign aid than we give to all countries combined. And I believe we DO give food to N Korea (or at least we did until they started the current standoff).
Cuba.
We hold a grudge. Sue us. But there is NOT a world-wide embargo of Cuba.
They get lots of money for military spending but no medical supplies or exchange teachers or food or whatever.
Maybe you'r having trouble with timeframes - we do NOT give Iraq money for weapons (we haven't since the 80s) and we DO give them food (oil for food program).

Your opinion is based on some major factual errors.
 
  • #3
Originally posted by russ_watters
Huh? Source? $90 billion is more foreign aid than we give to all countries combined. And I believe we DO give food to N Korea (or at least we did until they started the current standoff). We hold a grudge. Sue us. But there is NOT a world-wide embargo of Cuba. Maybe you'r having trouble with timeframes - we do NOT give Iraq money for weapons (we haven't since the 80s) and we DO give them food (oil for food program).

Your opinion is based on some major factual errors.

My opinion is based on what I've heard on television and read in the news.
Who really knows? Does Sam Donaldson know? Does Chris What's his name know? Doe's Ted down at CNN really know what gives? (EDIT: $90 billion in "aid" over 10 years)

You get told one thing. I get different news. Who's right?

The plain fact is we have been told about inhuman actions in these countries that have been boycotted or embargoed. Are these true stories? Is it the "regime" doing these acts?

The embargos may have been initiated because of the actions these regimes take. And the action these regimes take may be a result of the embargos.

That's what this thread is about.

What is the effect of embargos and boycotts?

Do they help anyone? Does embargo help to enlighten a boycotted nation by denying them education, food and raw materials..?

I don't see Jim Long Bottom Chowderhead losing any weight. Nor Fidel on the Roof... nor is Sadd-am-foot-stuck-in-the-door getting peckish by any stretch.
 
Last edited:

1. What is boycotting and how does it affect underdeveloped or developing countries?

Boycotting is the act of voluntarily abstaining from buying or using a product or service as a form of protest or to bring about change. In the context of underdeveloped or developing countries, boycotting can have both positive and negative effects. On one hand, it can put pressure on governments or companies to improve their practices and policies. On the other hand, it can also harm the economy and livelihoods of the people in these countries who rely on the production and sale of the boycotted products.

2. What are some examples of boycotts and their impact on underdeveloped or developing countries?

One example is the boycott of South African goods during the apartheid era, which put economic pressure on the government and contributed to the eventual downfall of the regime. However, this also had a negative impact on the livelihoods of many South African workers and farmers. Another example is the current boycott of palm oil products due to concerns about deforestation and labor rights violations. This has led to a decrease in demand for palm oil, causing economic difficulties for small farmers in countries like Indonesia and Malaysia.

3. Can boycotting lead to positive change in underdeveloped or developing countries?

Yes, boycotting can lead to positive change by raising awareness and putting pressure on companies and governments to improve their practices and policies. For example, the boycott of Nike in the 1990s due to labor rights violations in their factories led to the company implementing significant changes in their supply chain and working conditions for their workers. However, it is important for boycotting efforts to be strategic and consider the potential impact on the livelihoods of the people in these countries.

4. What are the potential risks of boycotting on underdeveloped or developing countries?

The potential risks of boycotting on underdeveloped or developing countries include economic harm to local producers and workers, loss of jobs, and disruption of trade and supply chains. In some cases, boycotting may also lead to increased poverty and instability in these countries. It is important to carefully consider the potential consequences before initiating a boycott and to work towards finding alternative solutions that benefit all parties involved.

5. What are some alternative ways to bring about change in underdeveloped or developing countries?

Instead of boycotting, there are other ways to bring about change in underdeveloped or developing countries, such as supporting fair trade practices, advocating for policy changes, and choosing to buy from companies that have ethical and sustainable practices. Additionally, supporting local businesses and investing in development projects can also contribute to positive change in these countries. It is important to consider all options and their potential impact before taking action.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Computing and Technology
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
Back
Top